From: AZ Nomad on
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:42:46 -0500, Nate Nagel <njnagel(a)roosters.net> wrote:

>I converted my '55 Stude from an automatic to a 4-speed, I probably
>wouldn't do it again, but I really had to have a stickshift to be happy
>with the car. I'm thinking about converting it to a column-shift
>3-speed with overdrive for vintage coolness and more gear spread (or

Automobile design has changed a bit in the last 50 years.
From: Nate Nagel on
AZ Nomad wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:42:46 -0500, Nate Nagel <njnagel(a)roosters.net> wrote:
>
>> I converted my '55 Stude from an automatic to a 4-speed, I probably
>> wouldn't do it again, but I really had to have a stickshift to be happy
>> with the car. I'm thinking about converting it to a column-shift
>> 3-speed with overdrive for vintage coolness and more gear spread (or
>
> Automobile design has changed a bit in the last 50 years.

yeah, mostly for the more complex, making a swap even less of a good
idea unless you're really committed to it.

nate

--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel
From: Scott Dorsey on
AZ Nomad <aznomad.3(a)PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:42:46 -0500, Nate Nagel <njnagel(a)roosters.net> wrote:
>
>>I converted my '55 Stude from an automatic to a 4-speed, I probably
>>wouldn't do it again, but I really had to have a stickshift to be happy
>>with the car. I'm thinking about converting it to a column-shift
>>3-speed with overdrive for vintage coolness and more gear spread (or
>
>Automobile design has changed a bit in the last 50 years.

Sadly not anywhere NEAR enough.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."