{BS} We've asked the ACOE to act on our plans
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Hachi's despair
Next: Seen Google's main page todat?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 27 May 2010 11:04 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:htm1j9$mm1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message > news:8652c8Fv3nU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> On 2010-05-26 09:27:00 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> >> said: >> >>> It's not an issue of thinking parallel thoughts. It's an issue of >>> addressing >>> the point you make and then watching as you ignore what has been said >>> and go >>> off in an entirely different direction with a completely unrelated >>> topic. >> >> Correct. Mr. Rochester P. Milquetoast equates his being scatterbrained >> with the ability to think in more than a linear fashion. >> >> A sure proof of his mental illness. >> > > Or, his consumption of massive amounts of street drugs. That's your standard comment when you've completely lost track of what you were saying in the actual discussion.
From: Jeff Strickland on 27 May 2010 11:17 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:VkcLn.71373$rE4.62841(a)newsfe15.iad... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:htjiip$bh1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >> news:PVPKn.38806$_84.37326(a)newsfe18.iad... >>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:htf1s8$hd0$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> >>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message >>>> news:dtDKn.17627$h57.8220(a)newsfe22.iad... >>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>> news:3sDKn.30583$wV2.28249(a)newsfe23.iad... >>>>>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:44:31 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ToCKn.18749$Gx2.11572(a)newsfe20.iad... >>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:05:22 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 23:05:54 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:c_lKn.36950$304.26745(a)newsfe12.iad... >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 22:14:13 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:B2_Jn.21047$mi.1914(a)newsfe01.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>> This from shrimp fishermen in the LA Bayou country. Seems >>>>>>>>>>>>> Obama did >>>>>>>>>>>>> such a great job in response to the oil spill these people had >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> get NBC news to take up their plight. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, you probably think we should expand drilling, >>>>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>>>> it's "safe". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, the possible destruction of a coastal economy is of no >>>>>>>>>> consequence, since you don't live there. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Apparently. I'll have to remember that when the next hurricane >>>>>>>>> creeps >>>>>>>>> up the Atlantic coastline and hits Massachusetts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He puts words in my mouth and you "Mee Too" with him. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The *real* topic here is the Obama administration's lack of >>>>>>>> response for >>>>>>>> the area. Meanwhile, you're apparently steamed at me for "not >>>>>>>> caring". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Funny, you haven't said a word about the administration's >>>>>>>> mishandling of >>>>>>>> the situation, of the fishermen who have asked the administration >>>>>>>> to let >>>>>>>> them help, the fact the ACOE has been requested and there has been >>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>> action, but the real problem is that I don't appear to care. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's because you DO NOT care. You think we should keep drilling, >>>>>>> even >>>>>>> though all suggestions of safety are pure lies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yup. Drill baby drill! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Weren't you one of the mooks who said "Obama gave away oil drilling >>>>> rights to China"? I think that was you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, Obama did. And the Chinese are drilling along side the Deepwater >>>> Horizon in the same 5,000 feet of water. Hugo Chavez and the Castro >>>> Brothers are also drilling there. >>> >>> >>> That's simply not true. But you're not interested in facts. You only >>> want to hear or read what you already "know". Have you always been a >>> mook? >>> >> >> >> But it is true. Maybe it's a bit of an exaggeration that the Chicoms are >> drilling along side the Deepwater Horizon because they are really >> drilling a few miles away, but they are drilling in the Gulf, they are >> drilling in 5,000 ft of water. >> >> DISCUSSION >> Have you stopped beating your wife? >> >> JOE >> She's not my wife. >> >> >> >> Completely missing the point that the beating is the part of the >> discussion, you disect the relationship and point out the inaccuracy. The >> point is that the Chinese and the Venezuelians, and others, are all >> drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, not just us. It doesn't matter that the >> rigs are within eyesight of one another or over the horizon. > > > I'm missing the point? You said Obama gave away drilling rights. In fact, > the "rights" for that area were in place long before Obama, per an > agreement WE made with Cuba. Obama had absolutely NOTHING to do with the > situation. > I never said anything of the sort. Obama DID give out new leases, but I'm pretty sure none of them are active drill sites yet. That issue -- Obama giving leases to other countries -- is not related to this issue at all. > The issue is NOT that any particular country is drilling in that region. > The issue is why they're legally able to do so. If you disagree, bring > facts to the discussion. > And the monkey and his football have taken yet another odd bounce. You really need to back away from the crack pipe.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 27 May 2010 11:22 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:htm2eg$rlm$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> I'm missing the point? You said Obama gave away drilling rights. In fact, >> the "rights" for that area were in place long before Obama, per an >> agreement WE made with Cuba. Obama had absolutely NOTHING to do with the >> situation. >> > > I never said anything of the sort. Obama DID give out new leases, but I'm > pretty sure none of them are active drill sites yet. That issue -- Obama > giving leases to other countries -- is not related to this issue at all. I'm making it the issue right NOW. Do you believe that Obama is somehow responsible for other countries being able to drill in areas where we are not drilling now? Yes or no? Is Obama connected?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 27 May 2010 11:33 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:htm25l$q9u$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... You're really rude. You never thank your "daddy" from Texas for all the help he gives you. Say thank you to your daddy from Texas.
From: Jeff Strickland on 27 May 2010 11:58
"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:Q5wLn.112363$0M5.32899(a)newsfe07.iad... > > Would you agree that based on the current disaster, oil companies cannot > be trusted to do the right thing to prevent these things from happening? > As the monkey and his football bounce in yet another direction ... No, I would not say that at all. It's ugly, no question of that. But everybody is trying to figure out what happened and how to fix it. There are multible facets to this problem, one of them that should be higher on the list than it appears to be is preventing the mess from making landfall. If you are going to thump your chest that Bush should have done more faster when Katrina came to visit, then you should be thumping your chest just as vigourously that Obama's' job in this disaster is to keep the mess from making landfall. To the extent that the oil is making landfall, Obama & Co. have not done their job. They had at least a week to coral this mess, but three weeks later the mess is still growing and making landfall further and further away. This isn't the only facet of the disaster, but it's one, and it's perhaps the most important facet that The Administration should be addressing now. As far as I can see, the Administration is sitting on it's hands. |