{BS} NO criticism of Obungler allowed. At all.
in [Toyota]
|
From: Jeff Strickland on 24 Jun 2010 18:05 "edspyhill01" <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:be9e3062-ec61-4383-828f-cceb7a8f4d8b(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 24, 4:19 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:04:51 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: >> >> > "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> >news:FrvUn.4003$kn1.1437(a)newsfe16.iad... >> >> Let me preface this with: McCrystal was wrong. He has had open words >> >> about Obama's ability to "command" before, and he got away with it. >> >> But >> >> he should have clammed up this time. >> >> >> However, in an office today while reparing a computer, the buzz wasn't >> >> about whether McCrystal (McKrystal?) >> >> > McChrystal. >> >> Yeah, I got that already. Thanks anyway. > > Did you hear what Admiral Mullens said about the article? No. Did you hear what Limbaugh said? I'm not one to pick up Rolling Stone, but if Limbaugh is correct then Obama and McChrystal are actually on the samem page from a policy standpoint, and McChrystal had more dissing for everybody around Obama that are not on the same page.
From: edspyhill01 on 24 Jun 2010 22:49 On Jun 24, 6:05 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > "edspyhill01" <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:be9e3062-ec61-4383-828f-cceb7a8f4d8b(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 4:19 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:04:51 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: > > >> > "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > >> >news:FrvUn.4003$kn1.1437(a)newsfe16.iad... > >> >> Let me preface this with: McCrystal was wrong. He has had open words > >> >> about Obama's ability to "command" before, and he got away with it. > >> >> But > >> >> he should have clammed up this time. > > >> >> However, in an office today while reparing a computer, the buzz wasn't > >> >> about whether McCrystal (McKrystal?) > > >> > McChrystal. > > >> Yeah, I got that already. Thanks anyway. > > > Did you hear what Admiral Mullens said about the article? > > No. Did you hear what Limbaugh said? > > I'm not one to pick up Rolling Stone, but if Limbaugh is correct then Obama > and McChrystal are actually on the samem page from a policy standpoint, and > McChrystal had more dissing for everybody around Obama that are not on the > same page.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Limbaugh? BBRRAAaahahahahahahaaa
From: edspyhill01 on 24 Jun 2010 22:50 On Jun 24, 6:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstr...(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: > "edspyhill01" <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:be9e3062-ec61-4383-828f-cceb7a8f4d8b(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 4:19 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:04:51 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: > > >> > "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > >> >news:FrvUn.4003$kn1.1437(a)newsfe16.iad... > >> >> Let me preface this with: McCrystal was wrong. He has had open words > >> >> about Obama's ability to "command" before, and he got away with it. > >> >> But > >> >> he should have clammed up this time. > > >> >> However, in an office today while reparing a computer, the buzz wasn't > >> >> about whether McCrystal (McKrystal?) > > >> > McChrystal. > > >> Yeah, I got that already. Thanks anyway. > > > Did you hear what Admiral Mullens said about the article? > > What did he say?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - “Honestly, when I first read it, I was nearly sick,” said Admiral Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/world/asia/25military.html
From: Jeff Strickland on 24 Jun 2010 23:42 "edspyhill01" <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:4f2c0752-eeac-41a0-b766-152b00e31d5b(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 24, 6:05 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> "edspyhill01" <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:be9e3062-ec61-4383-828f-cceb7a8f4d8b(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Jun 24, 4:19 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:04:51 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: >> >> >> > "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> >> >news:FrvUn.4003$kn1.1437(a)newsfe16.iad... >> >> >> Let me preface this with: McCrystal was wrong. He has had open >> >> >> words >> >> >> about Obama's ability to "command" before, and he got away with it. >> >> >> But >> >> >> he should have clammed up this time. >> >> >> >> However, in an office today while reparing a computer, the buzz >> >> >> wasn't >> >> >> about whether McCrystal (McKrystal?) >> >> >> > McChrystal. >> >> >> Yeah, I got that already. Thanks anyway. >> >> > Did you hear what Admiral Mullens said about the article? >> >> No. Did you hear what Limbaugh said? >> >> I'm not one to pick up Rolling Stone, but if Limbaugh is correct then >> Obama >> and McChrystal are actually on the samem page from a policy standpoint, >> and >> McChrystal had more dissing for everybody around Obama that are not on >> the >> same page.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Limbaugh? BBRRAAaahahahahahahaaa I knew you would say that. I've not read the article, but if the scant information I have is accurate, then Obama dumped the wrong guy if he was trying to stop the divisiveness in his Administration.
From: edspyhill01 on 25 Jun 2010 00:04
On Jun 24, 11:42 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > "edspyhill01" <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:4f2c0752-eeac-41a0-b766-152b00e31d5b(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 6:05 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> "edspyhill01" <edspyhil...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:be9e3062-ec61-4383-828f-cceb7a8f4d8b(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > >> > On Jun 24, 4:19 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:04:51 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: > > >> >> > "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > >> >> >news:FrvUn.4003$kn1.1437(a)newsfe16.iad... > >> >> >> Let me preface this with: McCrystal was wrong. He has had open > >> >> >> words > >> >> >> about Obama's ability to "command" before, and he got away with it. > >> >> >> But > >> >> >> he should have clammed up this time. > > >> >> >> However, in an office today while reparing a computer, the buzz > >> >> >> wasn't > >> >> >> about whether McCrystal (McKrystal?) > > >> >> > McChrystal. > > >> >> Yeah, I got that already. Thanks anyway. > > >> > Did you hear what Admiral Mullens said about the article? > > >> No. Did you hear what Limbaugh said? > > >> I'm not one to pick up Rolling Stone, but if Limbaugh is correct then > >> Obama > >> and McChrystal are actually on the samem page from a policy standpoint, > >> and > >> McChrystal had more dissing for everybody around Obama that are not on > >> the > >> same page.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Limbaugh? BBRRAAaahahahahahahaaa > > I knew you would say that. > > I've not read the article, but if the scant information I have is accurate, > then Obama dumped the wrong guy if he was trying to stop the divisiveness in > his Administration.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Every behavior has consequences. McChrystal and his staff went too far. McChrystal was probably on probation after leaking the war plans to the press before he gave them to Obama about 7 months ago. McChrystal left no wiggle room. I think he wanted out, but never "quits". The Afghan war is toast. It's unwinnable. We could end it tomorrow and most would barely notice. We are about to make a deal with the Taliban - keep out al Qaeda and we leave. BTW, Obama is making the same mistakes with our wars of adventure every president has made since Korea. |