{BS} NO criticism of Obungler allowed. At all.
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 23 Jun 2010 19:27 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:17:51 -0500, FatterDumber& Happier Moe wrote: > Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: >> Let me preface this with: McCrystal was wrong. He has had open words >> about Obama's ability to "command" before, and he got away with it. But >> he should have clammed up this time. >> >> However, in an office today while reparing a computer, the buzz wasn't >> about whether McCrystal (McKrystal?) was right or wrong, it was that he >> criticised Obungler. Period. Nothing more. >> >> Hopefully, Fox News will hire him as a commentator. I would like to see >> MSNBC hire him, but we know that's not going to happen... >> >> >> > I gotta wonder what McCrystal would have done if one of his > subordinates had said such thing about him and they were published? He fired his aide.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 23 Jun 2010 19:31 On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:38:40 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > Here's a story which will be interesting to any normal adult. > > http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/119236 > > Try very hard to avoid your usual response to you-know-what. All in all, a good arguement for separating the Commander In Cheif duties from the Office of the President.
From: CharlesGrozny on 23 Jun 2010 19:46 "Hachiroku ハチロク" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:ZOwUn.12703$hw5.5806(a)newsfe04.iad... > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:38:40 -0400, JoeSh!tforbrains wrote: > >> Here's a story which will be interesting to any normal adult. >> >> http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/119236 >> >> Try very hard to avoid your usual response to you-know-what. > > All in all, a good arguement for separating the Commander In Cheif duties > from the Office of the President. > > You have to remember, Joe's idea of a 'normal' adult is himself, a dolt. Charles Grozny
From: CharlesGrozny on 23 Jun 2010 21:26 "Hachiroku ハチロク" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:FrvUn.4003$kn1.1437(a)newsfe16.iad... > Let me preface this with: McCrystal was wrong. He has had open words about > Obama's ability to "command" before, and he got away with it. But he > should have clammed up this time. > > However, in an office today while reparing a computer, the buzz wasn't > about whether McCrystal (McKrystal?) was right or wrong, it was that he > criticised Obungler. Period. Nothing more. > > Hopefully, Fox News will hire him as a commentator. I would like to see > MSNBC hire him, but we know that's not going to happen... > > Maybe my lawyer friend was right. Nobama IS the Anti-Christ. Either that, or he's the next Stalin. He's not qualified to be the leader of the free world. Scary how the leftards follow him in lockstep. or should I say goose-step? Charles Grozny
From: Truckdude on 23 Jun 2010 23:57
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:FrvUn.4003$kn1.1437(a)newsfe16.iad... > Let me preface this with: McCrystal was wrong. He has had open words about > Obama's ability to "command" before, and he got away with it. But he > should have clammed up this time. > > However, in an office today while reparing a computer, the buzz wasn't > about whether McCrystal (McKrystal?) was right or wrong, it was that he > criticised Obungler. Period. Nothing more. > > Hopefully, Fox News will hire him as a commentator. I would like to see > MSNBC hire him, but we know that's not going to happen... > > It undermines the whole system if military officers are permitted to publicly criticize the civilian leadership, regardless of who is in office. The people in that office have their heads buried in the sand if they are trying to make it an "Obama got criticized" thing. |