From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:04:33 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

>> That second hand smoke probably isn't from cigarettes.....
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida
>
>
> You either agree with the cowgirl about lack of regulation, or you don't.
> Can you tell whether you agree or not, old man?

Where did I say lack of regulation?



From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.09.10.20.49.47.710736(a)e86.GTS...
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:17 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>> news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS...
>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>>> > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
>>>>> > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business in
>>>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's a
>>>>> good system when no one fucks with it.
>>>>
>>>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of the
>>>> points.
>>>>
>>>> But still:
>>>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most excited.
>>>> Interesting.
>>>
>>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company.
>>> Period. Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period.
>>
>>
>> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make their
>> own "rules"?
>
> Where did I say that?


"Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company."


From: JoeSpareBedroom on
"Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message
news:h8br6j$mnh$1(a)news.albasani.net...
> On 2009-09-10 13:49:49 -0700, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:17 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS...
>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>>>>> ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
>>>>>>> insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> good system when no one fucks with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of
>>>>> the
>>>>> points.
>>>>>
>>>>> But still:
>>>>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most excited.
>>>>> Interesting.
>>>>
>>>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company.
>>>> Period. Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period.
>>>
>>>
>>> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make their
>>> own "rules"?
>>
>> Where did I say that?
>
> You didn't. An estrogen-addled "mind" plays tricks on her.
>


"Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company."


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:20:05 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

>>>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company.
>>>> Period. Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks,
>>>> period.
>>>
>>>
>>> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make
>>> their own "rules"?
>>
>> Where did I say that?
>
>
> "Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company."

Where does it say anything about regulation?

Less regulation is always better.