From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 10 Sep 2009 16:50 On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:04:33 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> That second hand smoke probably isn't from cigarettes..... >> >> -- >> >> Scott in Florida > > > You either agree with the cowgirl about lack of regulation, or you don't. > Can you tell whether you agree or not, old man? Where did I say lack of regulation?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 10 Sep 2009 22:20 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.09.10.20.49.47.710736(a)e86.GTS... > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:17 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS... >>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: >>> >>>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: >>>>> > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the >>>>> > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)? >>>>> >>>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business in >>>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government. >>>>> >>>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's a >>>>> good system when no one fucks with it. >>>> >>>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of the >>>> points. >>>> >>>> But still: >>>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most excited. >>>> Interesting. >>> >>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company. >>> Period. Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period. >> >> >> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make their >> own "rules"? > > Where did I say that? "Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company."
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 10 Sep 2009 22:20 "Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message news:h8br6j$mnh$1(a)news.albasani.net... > On 2009-09-10 13:49:49 -0700, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said: > >> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:17 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> >>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>> news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS... >>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: >>>>>>> ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the >>>>>>> insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)? >>>>>> >>>>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business >>>>>> in >>>>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's >>>>>> a >>>>>> good system when no one fucks with it. >>>>> >>>>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of >>>>> the >>>>> points. >>>>> >>>>> But still: >>>>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most excited. >>>>> Interesting. >>>> >>>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company. >>>> Period. Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period. >>> >>> >>> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make their >>> own "rules"? >> >> Where did I say that? > > You didn't. An estrogen-addled "mind" plays tricks on her. > "Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company."
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 10 Sep 2009 22:34 On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:20:05 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company. >>>> Period. Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, >>>> period. >>> >>> >>> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make >>> their own "rules"? >> >> Where did I say that? > > > "Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company." Where does it say anything about regulation? Less regulation is always better.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: {BS} Is it OK now to mention... Next: Eli Manning Back Hawking Cars for Toyota |