From: edspyhill01 on 10 Sep 2009 14:43 On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: > > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the > > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)? > What were the papers the righties were waving?
From: edspyhill01 on 10 Sep 2009 14:45 On Sep 9, 10:38 pm, matrixxx09 <matrixx...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > > > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: > > > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the > > > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)? > > > That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business in the > > US, and not having everything run by the government. > > > It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. > > It's a good system when no one fucks with it. > > You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of > the points. > > But still: > ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most > excited. Interesting. > > > > > > Not to say it's a bad idea but it was quite telling that *that* is what > > > got them the most excited. Interesting. > > > > Oh, and did you also notice that Boehner has darker skin than Obama? :) > > > Is that who it was. I thought it was Al Sharpton. > > ha! > > Does the boehn go tanning or something? Maybe he has jungle fever for Michele and thinks he can "change his luck" and attract a black woman if he does the reverse michael jackson.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 10 Sep 2009 16:47 On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:43:22 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: >> > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the >> > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)? >> > What were the papers the righties were waving? Estimates of the deficit having an organization as inefficient as the US government running health care.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 10 Sep 2009 16:48 On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:45:27 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: >> > Is that who it was. I thought it was Al Sharpton. >> >> ha! >> >> Does the boehn go tanning or something? > > Maybe he has jungle fever for Michele and thinks he can "change his luck" > and attract a black woman if he does the reverse michael jackson. Hey! That could explain it! Michelle got back, ya know.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 10 Sep 2009 16:49 On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:17 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS... >> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: >> >>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote: >>>> > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the >>>> > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)? >>>> >>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business in >>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government. >>>> >>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's a >>>> good system when no one fucks with it. >>> >>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of the >>> points. >>> >>> But still: >>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most excited. >>> Interesting. >> >> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company. >> Period. Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period. > > > So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make their > own "rules"? Where did I say that?
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: {BS} Is it OK now to mention... Next: Eli Manning Back Hawking Cars for Toyota |