From: edspyhill01 on
On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
> > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
> > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>
What were the papers the righties were waving?
From: edspyhill01 on
On Sep 9, 10:38 pm, matrixxx09 <matrixx...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
> > > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
> > > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>
> > That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business in the
> > US, and not having everything run by the government.
>
> > It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere.
> > It's a good system when no one fucks with it.
>
> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of
> the points.
>
> But still:
> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most
> excited. Interesting.
>
>
>
> > > Not to say it's a bad idea but it was quite telling that *that* is what
> > > got them the most excited. Interesting.
>
> > > Oh, and did you also notice that Boehner has darker skin than Obama? :)
>
> > Is that who it was. I thought it was Al Sharpton.
>
> ha!
>
> Does the boehn go tanning or something?

Maybe he has jungle fever for Michele and thinks he can "change his
luck" and attract a black woman if he does the reverse michael jackson.
From: Hachiroku on
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:43:22 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote:

> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>> > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
>> > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>>
> What were the papers the righties were waving?


Estimates of the deficit having an organization as inefficient as the US
government running health care.


From: Hachiroku on
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:45:27 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote:

>> > Is that who it was. I thought it was Al Sharpton.
>>
>> ha!
>>
>> Does the boehn go tanning or something?
>
> Maybe he has jungle fever for Michele and thinks he can "change his luck"
> and attract a black woman if he does the reverse michael jackson.

Hey! That could explain it! Michelle got back, ya know.



From: Hachiroku on
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:17 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS...
>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>> > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
>>>> > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>>>>
>>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business in
>>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government.
>>>>
>>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's a
>>>> good system when no one fucks with it.
>>>
>>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of the
>>> points.
>>>
>>> But still:
>>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most excited.
>>> Interesting.
>>
>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company.
>> Period. Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period.
>
>
> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make their
> own "rules"?

Where did I say that?