Prev: {BS} Is it OK now to mention...
Next: Eli Manning Back Hawking Cars for Toyota
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 10 Sep 2009 12:49
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS...
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>
>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>> > ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
>>> > insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>>>
>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business in
>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government.
>>>
>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's a
>>> good system when no one fucks with it.
>>
>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of the
>> points.
>>
>> But still:
>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most excited.
>> Interesting.
>
> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company. Period.
> Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period.


So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make their own
"rules"?


From: JoeSpareBedroom on 10 Sep 2009 13:42
"Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message
news:h8bd51$v9t$1(a)news.albasani.net...
> On 2009-09-10 10:23:41 -0700, Scott in Florida <MoveOn(a)outa.here> said:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:17 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>> <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS...
>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>>>>> ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
>>>>>>> insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> good system when no one fucks with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of
>>>>> the
>>>>> points.
>>>>>
>>>>> But still:
>>>>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most excited.
>>>>> Interesting.
>>>>
>>>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company.
>>>> Period.
>>>> Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period.
>>>
>>>
>>> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make their
>>> own
>>> "rules"?
>>>
>>
>> It would be better than what we have now....
>
> Again, notice her tin can. The Bathroom Blower switches from government
> not running businesses to not regulating them, without skipping a beat. A
> total lack of any kind of context grasp.
>
> You have to stand in awe of such a defective mind. I'm guessing too much
> second-hand smoke in nightclubs where the band plays, i.e. oxygen
> deprivation.
>


Your little friend, the sot, just confirmed that you are incorrect.


From: JoeSpareBedroom on 10 Sep 2009 14:04
"Scott in Florida" <MoveOn(a)outa.here> wrote in message
news:nofia5ten1aqii6573t87l2vsdpb793ekn(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:31:13 -0700, Conscience <nobama@g�v.com> wrote:
>
>>On 2009-09-10 10:23:41 -0700, Scott in Florida <MoveOn(a)outa.here> said:
>>
>>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:17 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>>> <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2009.09.10.02.42.17.322086(a)e86.GTS...
>>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:38:22 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 9, 10:34 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:11:54 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>>>>>>>> ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
>>>>>>>> insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's because Republicans are for letting companies be in business
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the US, and not having everything run by the government.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's called 'capitalism'. I'm sure it's in Wikipedia somewhere. It's
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> good system when no one fucks with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You could sit here and argue for it. Fine. I may agree on some of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> points.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But still:
>>>>>> ...it was quite telling that *that* is what got them the most
>>>>>> excited.
>>>>>> Interesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Real Conservatives don't want the government touching ANY company.
>>>>> Period.
>>>>> Not car companies, noit insurance companies, not banks, period.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, no regulations for food or pharmaceuticals? Let companies make
>>>> their own
>>>> "rules"?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It would be better than what we have now....
>>
>>Again, notice her tin can. The Bathroom Blower switches from
>>government not running businesses to not regulating them, without
>>skipping a beat. A total lack of any kind of context grasp.
>>
>>You have to stand in awe of such a defective mind. I'm guessing too
>>much second-hand smoke in nightclubs where the band plays, i.e. oxygen
>>deprivation.
>
> That second hand smoke probably isn't from cigarettes.....
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida


You either agree with the cowgirl about lack of regulation, or you don't.
Can you tell whether you agree or not, old man?


From: JoeSpareBedroom on 10 Sep 2009 14:36
"Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message
news:h8bgqg$5lp$1(a)news.albasani.net...
> On 2009-09-10 11:02:29 -0700, Scott in Florida <MoveOn(a)outa.here> said:
>
>>> Again, notice her tin can. The Bathroom Blower switches from
>>> government not running businesses to not regulating them, without
>>> skipping a beat. A total lack of any kind of context grasp.
>>>
>>> You have to stand in awe of such a defective mind. I'm guessing too
>>> much second-hand smoke in nightclubs where the band plays, i.e. oxygen
>>> deprivation.
>>
>> That second hand smoke probably isn't from cigarettes.....
>
> Likely. But the effect would be the same.
>
> Obviously.
>


You two old codgers need to get your stories synchronized. And your diapers
on straight.


From: edspyhill01 on 10 Sep 2009 14:42
On Sep 9, 10:11 pm, matrixxx09 <matrixx...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> ...the Republicans favorite part was the part about protecting the
> insurance companies (ie Tort Reform)?
>
> Not to say it's a bad idea but it was quite telling that *that* is
> what got them the most excited.  Interesting.
>
> Oh, and did you also notice that Boehner has darker skin than Obama? :)

He looked like he was also jonesin' for his 3 or 4 Robroys.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: {BS} Is it OK now to mention...
Next: Eli Manning Back Hawking Cars for Toyota