Prev: seat belt warranty
Next: {BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 12 Sep 2009 19:57
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:47:57 -0700, matrixxxx09 wrote:

> On Sep 12, 7:38 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:18:31 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>> > On Sep 12, 6:08 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> >>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party
>>
>> > The other one wasn't real? In what sense? They weren't 'men'? There
>> > weren't a million of them? It wasn't a march?
>>
>> > There are many interpretations of your title, and I'm just curious.
>>
>> I can't remember the numbver, but it wasn't amillion.
>
> They range from 400K, too low, to over a million, too high.
>
> Conscience says the "computer-scanned" number is 650,000.
>
> Anyway, this one WAS a million, hence a REAL million man march?


Probably not, but the Mall was filled.


From: matrixxxx09 on 12 Sep 2009 20:01
On Sep 12, 7:57 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:47:57 -0700, matrixxxx09 wrote:
> > On Sep 12, 7:38 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:18:31 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
> >> > On Sep 12, 6:08 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> >> >>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party
>
> >> > The other one wasn't real? In what sense? They weren't 'men'? There
> >> > weren't a million of them? It wasn't a march?
>
> >> > There are many interpretations of your title, and I'm just curious.
>
> >> I can't remember the numbver, but it wasn't amillion.
>
> > They range from 400K, too low, to over a million, too high.
>
> > Conscience says the "computer-scanned" number is 650,000.
>
> > Anyway, this one WAS a million, hence a REAL million man march?
>
> Probably not, but the Mall was filled.

More or less than the million man march? Just curious. It won't mean
anything either way.
From: Jeff Strickland on 12 Sep 2009 20:45

"matrixxx09" <matrixxx09(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5459c53f-9c3e-44b7-b492-492e8849c2f3(a)o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 12, 6:53� pm, Conscience <nobama@göv.com> wrote:
> On 2009-09-12 15:08:27 -0700, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS>
> said:
>
> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party
>
> As opposed to the first, which had nothing close to 200,000?

You sure about that? Or do you just want that to be true and so, to
you, it is?


<JS>
The Million Man March with Louis Farrakahn leading was well short of a
million men. Well short. I don't recall the number, but 200k to 250k sounds
about right.

</JS>







From: matrixxxx09 on 12 Sep 2009 20:48
On Sep 12, 8:45 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> "matrixxx09" <matrixx...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:5459c53f-9c3e-44b7-b492-492e8849c2f3(a)o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 12, 6:53 pm, Conscience <nobama@göv.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2009-09-12 15:08:27 -0700, Hachiroku ムムロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS>
> > said:
>
> > >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party
>
> > As opposed to the first, which had nothing close to 200,000?
>
> You sure about that?  Or do you just want that to be true and so, to
> you, it is?
>
> <JS>
> The Million Man March with Louis Farrakahn leading was well short of a
> million men. Well short. I don't recall the number, but 200k to 250k sounds
> about right.
>
> </JS>

I'm getting some discrepant numbers here. We went from 'nothing close
to 200K' from C., then waaaay up to 650,000 from C, and now we're back
down to 200-250K from Jeff.

C, what was the computer-scanned thing that you got the 650K figure
from? Did it sound definitive?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 12 Sep 2009 21:03
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:01:17 -0700, matrixxxx09 wrote:

> On Sep 12, 7:57 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:47:57 -0700, matrixxxx09 wrote:
>> > On Sep 12, 7:38 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:18:31 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>> >> > On Sep 12, 6:08 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> >> >>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party
>>
>> >> > The other one wasn't real? In what sense? They weren't 'men'?
>> >> > There weren't a million of them? It wasn't a march?
>>
>> >> > There are many interpretations of your title, and I'm just curious.
>>
>> >> I can't remember the numbver, but it wasn't amillion.
>>
>> > They range from 400K, too low, to over a million, too high.
>>
>> > Conscience says the "computer-scanned" number is 650,000.
>>
>> > Anyway, this one WAS a million, hence a REAL million man march?
>>
>> Probably not, but the Mall was filled.
>
> More or less than the million man march? Just curious. It won't mean
> anything either way.


No estimats yet. Just "Tens of thousands", but the mall is (was) packed.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: seat belt warranty
Next: {BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox