Prev: seat belt warranty
Next: {BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 12 Sep 2009 18:08 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party
From: matrixxx09 on 12 Sep 2009 18:18 On Sep 12, 6:08 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party The other one wasn't real? In what sense? They weren't 'men'? There weren't a million of them? It wasn't a march? There are many interpretations of your title, and I'm just curious.
From: matrixxx09 on 12 Sep 2009 19:06 On Sep 12, 6:53 pm, Conscience <nobama@göv.com> wrote: > On 2009-09-12 15:08:27 -0700, Hachiroku ããã㯠<Tru...(a)e86.GTS> said: > > >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party > > As opposed to the first, which had nothing close to 200,000? You sure about that? Or do you just want that to be true and so, to you, it is?
From: matrixxx09 on 12 Sep 2009 19:16 On Sep 12, 7:11 pm, Conscience <nobama@göv.com> wrote: > On 2009-09-12 16:06:06 -0700, matrixxx09 <matrixx...(a)gmail.com> said: > > > On Sep 12, 6:53 pm, Conscience <nobama@göv.com> wrote: > >> On 2009-09-12 15:08:27 -0700, Hachiroku Ã£Æ Ã£Æ Ã£ÆÂãâ > > ¯ <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> said: > > >>>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party > > >> As opposed to the first, which had nothing close to 200,000? > > > You sure about that?  Or do you just want that to be true and so, to > > you, it is? > > Initial reports had that number.  A Google check puts it at a > computer-scanned 650,000. > > Take your pick.  Either way it wasn't a million-man march. 650,000. Well, you're right, that is "nothing close to 200,000".
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 12 Sep 2009 19:16
"Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message news:h8h8pq$oc$4(a)news.albasani.net... > On 2009-09-12 15:08:27 -0700, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said: > >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/tea-party > > As opposed to the first, which had nothing close to 200,000? > > Good show. > Good show. Carry on. You need to stop trying to be a British WWI general, or brush up on your Monty Python routine. |