Why the GOP really wants to alter the 14th Amendment
in [Toyota]
|
From: Kali on 13 Aug 2010 00:13 In article <f8Z8o.10911$EF1.2900(a)newsfe14.iad>, =?iso-2022-jp?q? Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= Trueno(a)e86.GTS says... > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:06:17 -0500, pandora wrote: > > >> When you don't look up facts, you make stuff up. And when you don't know > >> what the facts are, or the various arguments are, you are depending on > >> others to tell you what to think. This is one of the great laws of the > >> universe, genius. > > > > And don't forget, after that he insults and then runs away. > > Do you ever add anything substanative? > > A female JoeSpareBedroom. Yes. But it's subtle and a bit dry, so you wouldn't pick up on it. -- Kali
From: Kali on 13 Aug 2010 00:16 In article <ui29o.15512$st2.7704(a)newsfe09.iad>, =?iso-2022-jp?q? Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= Trueno(a)e86.GTS says... > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:35:40 -0500, pandora wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:50:19 -0400, Hachiroku ???? wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:06:17 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> > >>>> When you don't look up facts, you make stuff up. And when you don't > >>>> know what the facts are, or the various arguments are, you are > >>>> depending on others to tell you what to think. This is one of the > >>>> great laws of the universe, genius. > >>> > >>> And don't forget, after that he insults and then runs away. > >> > >> Do you ever add anything substanative? > > > > Did your dictionary fail you? > > > > Yup. I meant substantioal. lol fat fingers ^^^^ > Something you never add. > > Ah well, a spelling error once in a while is better than being wrong all > the time. -- Kali
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 13 Aug 2010 00:35 On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:09:12 -0700, Conscience wrote: > On 2010-08-12 19:25:34 -0700, Hachiroku ハチロク <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said: >> My lifestyle has nothing to do with the fact I can think rings around you. > > That's not a bragging point, Hach, unless you want my dog's company. What kind of company is it?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 13 Aug 2010 00:37 On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:16:43 -0400, Kali wrote: >> >> Do you ever add anything substanative? >> > >> > Did your dictionary fail you? >> > >> >> Yup. I meant substantioal. > > lol fat fingers ^^^^ Hey, I never said I was a typist!
From: Kali on 13 Aug 2010 00:40
In article <C129o.4078$co1.2238(a)newsfe11.iad>, =?iso-2022-jp?q? Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= Trueno(a)e86.GTS says... > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:38:09 -0400, ah wrote: > > >>>>> With such a policy, one would be revoking the citizenship of the > >>>>> *baby*. You know what the Constitution says? Born *here* in the US, > >>>>> you're a citizen. Live with it. > >>>> > >>>> No, it doesn't. > >>>> > >>> Yes, it does. > >> > >> Pardon me, your ignorance is showing yet again. The CONSTITUTION does NOT > >> allow for "Born here, Citizen here". > >> > >> The CONSTITUTION does NOT allow for Free Speech. > >> > >> The CONSTITUTION does NOT allow for the right to bear arms. > >> > >> > > > > Yes; you heard it right here, Folks. 99.9% of those with a C or better in history have it wrong I guess. > ZOOOOOM! > > WHERE in the Constitution does it allow for Free Speech? The Constitution allows slavery? -- Kali |