Why the GOP really wants to alter the 14th Amendment
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Aug 2010 23:58 On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:08:05 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Aug 11, 10:21 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:07:35 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>>> That position completely ignores the REALITY of illegal immigrants >> >>>> that have no citizenship in the first place do not get citizenship for >> >>>> no other reason than the mother manages to plop out a baby within >> >>>> minutes of crawling under the wire. >> >> >>> With such a policy, one would be revoking the citizenship of the >> >>> *baby*. You know what the Constitution says? Born *here* in the US, >> >>> you're a citizen. Live with it. >> >> >> No, it doesn't. >> >> > Yes, it does. >> >> Pardon me, your ignorance is showing yet again. The CONSTITUTION does NOT >> allow for "Born here, Citizen here". >> >> The CONSTITUTION does NOT allow for Free Speech. >> >> The CONSTITUTION does NOT allow for the right to bear arms. > > You are frothing from the mouth again. Somebody get a paper bag for > Roachie can breath into. Where in the Constitution does it say people who are born here are Citizens?
From: edspyhill01 on 12 Aug 2010 00:24 On Aug 11, 11:58 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:08:05 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > > On Aug 11, 10:21 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:07:35 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> >>>> That position completely ignores the REALITY of illegal immigrants > >> >>>> that have no citizenship in the first place do not get citizenship for > >> >>>> no other reason than the mother manages to plop out a baby within > >> >>>> minutes of crawling under the wire. > > >> >>> With such a policy, one would be revoking the citizenship of the > >> >>> *baby*. You know what the Constitution says? Born *here* in the US, > >> >>> you're a citizen. Live with it. > > >> >> No, it doesn't. > > >> > Yes, it does. > > >> Pardon me, your ignorance is showing yet again. The CONSTITUTION does NOT > >> allow for "Born here, Citizen here". > > >> The CONSTITUTION does NOT allow for Free Speech. > > >> The CONSTITUTION does NOT allow for the right to bear arms. > > > You are frothing from the mouth again. Somebody get a paper bag for > > Roachie can breath into. > > Where in the Constitution does it say people who are born here are > Citizens?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Oh oh. We are going deep in rightwing world.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 12 Aug 2010 00:29 On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:24:05 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: > On Aug 11, 11:58 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:08:05 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: >> > On Aug 11, 10:21 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:07:35 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >> >>>> That position completely ignores the REALITY of illegal immigrants >> >> >>>> that have no citizenship in the first place do not get citizenship for >> >> >>>> no other reason than the mother manages to plop out a baby within >> >> >>>> minutes of crawling under the wire. >> >> >> >>> With such a policy, one would be revoking the citizenship of the >> >> >>> *baby*. You know what the Constitution says? Born *here* in the US, >> >> >>> you're a citizen. Live with it. >> >> >> >> No, it doesn't. >> >> >> > Yes, it does. >> >> >> Pardon me, your ignorance is showing yet again. The CONSTITUTION does NOT >> >> allow for "Born here, Citizen here". >> >> >> The CONSTITUTION does NOT allow for Free Speech. >> >> >> The CONSTITUTION does NOT allow for the right to bear arms. >> >> > You are frothing from the mouth again. Somebody get a paper bag for >> > Roachie can breath into. >> >> Where in the Constitution does it say people who are born here are >> Citizens?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Oh oh. We are going deep in rightwing world. Ed, I know you have Liberal ideas, but I always thought you had a spark. Don't disappoint me...
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 12 Aug 2010 01:05 On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:38:22 -0700, Conscience wrote: > On 2010-08-11 20:57:40 -0700, Hachiroku ハチロク <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said: >>> He can't help it, he is a rightwingnut true believer. These guys clam >>> up over the weekends because Limpballs, Manatee, Billow, Dreck don't >>> blather talking points on weekends. They just sit there staring at >>> their screens wishing they had something to say. >> >> >> Not at all. I just LOVE Sunday morning, esp with Gregory at NBC. He gives >> me enough material for a week, without having to wait for Limbaugh to >> reiterate what I say here SUnday morning. > > I should have left my jar with you before leaving. You really haven't > done a good enough job keeping eddie confined as I had. Apparently > he's been wasting quite a bit of bandwidth in my absence. He has his moments.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 12 Aug 2010 01:06
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:39:23 -0700, Conscience wrote: > On 2010-08-11 21:29:53 -0700, Hachiroku ハチロク <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> said: >> Ed, I know you have Liberal ideas, but I always thought you had a spark. >> Don't disappoint me... > > You misspelled "spork", him not being allowed to handle sharp objects and all. Ah. You have your moments, too! ;) |