Prev: Don't let diabetes take over your life!
Next: WITHOUT QUESTION, THIS IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE VEHICLE MANUFACTURED IN 2010.
From: Sylvia Else on 20 Feb 2010 20:07 On 21/02/2010 3:51 AM, clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:26:39 +1100, Sylvia Else > <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote: > >> On 20/02/2010 4:44 AM, boyari2 wrote: >>> NICE, HUH? >>> >>> http://surftofind.com/dodge >>> >>> >>> Any worthy rivals? >> >> It immediately makes me think of teenage boys who will remain convinced >> that they have rally driving prowess until such time as a large tree >> provides a different perspective. >> >> Sylvia. > Have you driven one? > It is as capable as it looks. That seems like a non sequitur to me. Sylvia.
From: clare on 20 Feb 2010 23:45 On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:22:57 -0500, Berf <berf1(a)live.ca> wrote: >Conscience wrote >> >> On 2010-02-20 12:02:46 -0800, Berf <berf1(a)live.ca> said:] >> >> >>>>>> http://surftofind.com/dodge >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Any worthy rivals? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> rather slab-sided. >> >>>> >> >>>> Drive one. It's like looking over a football field to see the road ahead. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> And what do you think the 1980 camaro is like or the 1979 corvettes >> >> >> >> They're not like driving a barge. >> > >> > >> > late 1970's to mid 1980's sport cars in the USA were trash. >> >> No doubt about it. Mea Culpa, as I was thinking of late '60s Camaros >> when I posted. > >My family's second car was a 1967 Ford Galaxie, with a freaking 392 cdi in the >thing! That's the one I took my drivers license in! > >Roar! That car had balls. > It was either a 352 or a 390, as Ford NEVER built a 392.
From: clare on 21 Feb 2010 23:12
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:27:28 -0400, Picasso <Picasso(a)gmail.com> wrote: >clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:22:57 -0500, Berf <berf1(a)live.ca> wrote: >> >>> Conscience wrote >>>> On 2010-02-20 12:02:46 -0800, Berf <berf1(a)live.ca> said:] >>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://surftofind.com/dodge >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any worthy rivals? >>>>>>>>> rather slab-sided. >>>>>>>> Drive one. It's like looking over a football field to see the road ahead. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> And what do you think the 1980 camaro is like or the 1979 corvettes >>>>>> They're not like driving a barge. >>>>> >>>>> late 1970's to mid 1980's sport cars in the USA were trash. >>>> No doubt about it. Mea Culpa, as I was thinking of late '60s Camaros >>>> when I posted. >>> My family's second car was a 1967 Ford Galaxie, with a freaking 392 cdi in the >>> thing! That's the one I took my drivers license in! >>> >>> Roar! That car had balls. >>> >> It was either a 352 or a 390, as Ford NEVER built a 392. > >292 maybe? Not in 67. The 292 (Y Block) was back around 1955. predecessor of the 312., successor to the 272. ,256 and 239 of 1954 |