From: Sylvia Else on
On 21/02/2010 3:51 AM, clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:26:39 +1100, Sylvia Else
> <sylvia(a)not.at.this.address> wrote:
>
>> On 20/02/2010 4:44 AM, boyari2 wrote:
>>> NICE, HUH?
>>>
>>> http://surftofind.com/dodge
>>>
>>>
>>> Any worthy rivals?
>>
>> It immediately makes me think of teenage boys who will remain convinced
>> that they have rally driving prowess until such time as a large tree
>> provides a different perspective.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> Have you driven one?
> It is as capable as it looks.

That seems like a non sequitur to me.

Sylvia.
From: clare on
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:22:57 -0500, Berf <berf1(a)live.ca> wrote:

>Conscience wrote
>>
>> On 2010-02-20 12:02:46 -0800, Berf <berf1(a)live.ca> said:]
>>
>> >>>>>> http://surftofind.com/dodge
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Any worthy rivals?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> rather slab-sided.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Drive one. It's like looking over a football field to see the road ahead.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> And what do you think the 1980 camaro is like or the 1979 corvettes
>> >>
>> >> They're not like driving a barge.
>> >
>> >
>> > late 1970's to mid 1980's sport cars in the USA were trash.
>>
>> No doubt about it. Mea Culpa, as I was thinking of late '60s Camaros
>> when I posted.
>
>My family's second car was a 1967 Ford Galaxie, with a freaking 392 cdi in the
>thing! That's the one I took my drivers license in!
>
>Roar! That car had balls.
>
It was either a 352 or a 390, as Ford NEVER built a 392.
From: clare on
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:27:28 -0400, Picasso <Picasso(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:22:57 -0500, Berf <berf1(a)live.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Conscience wrote
>>>> On 2010-02-20 12:02:46 -0800, Berf <berf1(a)live.ca> said:]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://surftofind.com/dodge
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any worthy rivals?
>>>>>>>>> rather slab-sided.
>>>>>>>> Drive one. It's like looking over a football field to see the road ahead.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And what do you think the 1980 camaro is like or the 1979 corvettes
>>>>>> They're not like driving a barge.
>>>>>
>>>>> late 1970's to mid 1980's sport cars in the USA were trash.
>>>> No doubt about it. Mea Culpa, as I was thinking of late '60s Camaros
>>>> when I posted.
>>> My family's second car was a 1967 Ford Galaxie, with a freaking 392 cdi in the
>>> thing! That's the one I took my drivers license in!
>>>
>>> Roar! That car had balls.
>>>
>> It was either a 352 or a 390, as Ford NEVER built a 392.
>
>292 maybe?
Not in 67. The 292 (Y Block) was back around 1955. predecessor of the
312., successor to the 272. ,256 and 239 of 1954