From: C. E. White on
Toyota execs rethink quality control
Automaker defends record but takes steps to prevent problems
Mark Rechtin
Automotive News -- July 12, 2010 - 12:01 am ET

TOYOTA CITY, Japan -- Chastened by a massive safety crisis, Toyota Motor
Corp. executives last week unveiled a new round of quality-control measures.
But several months into the uproar, they also remain defiant about the
company's record and its methods.

And as for allegations that an electronic software glitch causes unintended
acceleration, Shinji Sekido, head of the company's Electronics Development
Division No. 2, said: "We have not seen any phenomenon ... that would lead
to [acceleration] failures."

Toyota said it would increase by 1,000, or 50 percent, the number of
engineers devoted to troubleshooting quality glitches. It also vowed to
create a group of "devil's advocates" to check out customer complaints and
to extend product development deadlines by up to a month to enable engineers
to prevent problems at launch.

Toyota also will communicate more with suppliers that develop key parts and
will bring more r&d work back in-house from contract engineers. It also will
conduct testing to try to determine how customers actually drive their cars.

"The fast growth of the past decade has been too much in some areas for the
company to keep up with," Executive Vice President Takeshi Uchiyamada told
reporters at Toyota headquarters. He said future growth would be constrained
by Toyota's engineering resources.

The latest steps are an evolution of the "Customer First" philosophy
initiated in 2007 under former President Katsuaki Watanabe and pushed
forward by current chief Akio Toyoda.

Katsutoshi Sakata, head of the new Design Quality Innovation division, said
the new teams will take a "neutral stance" in their "early detection, early
resolution" mission.

"Our engineers did not pay sufficient attention to the customer's
viewpoint," Sakata said. "We often believed our technology was correct. We
need a calm eye to detect problems more readily."

In developing new products, Toyota will rely less on virtual prototyping and
computer-aided design and will revert to the old method of building more
sheet metal prototypes to ferret out bugs before launch, Uchiyamada said.

"We have to go back to the physical things; otherwise, we cannot anticipate
and learn," he said. "If we are well-versed with physical product, then we
can come back to the virtual prototype. You have to think about the feel of
the car, which is hard to quantify, and rely on the human senses."


More local engineers

Toyota also will expand its quality effort in the United States and Canada
by staffing seven field offices with extra engineers charged with
investigating customer complaints.

That staffing will be separate from Toyota's Swift Market Analysis Response
Team, which has been scrutinizing customers' unintended-acceleration claims.
Regional markets also will have more autonomy and authority in tracking
quality bugs.

In the past, local Toyota executives have said Japan was slow to respond to
customer complaints. Now, the North American quality teams and executives
have direct channels to the top executives in Japan, including Akio Toyoda.

"Critical safety-related issues didn't rise to the top," said Dino
Triantafyllos, regional product safety executive for Toyota Motor
Engineering & Manufacturing North America. "We are improving the
decision-making process."

The cost of those actions appears to be irrelevant.

"The limitation of resources should never be an excuse," said Hiroaki
Sunakawa, general manager of Toyota's Customer Quality Engineering division.


Blaming the customer?

Yet for all the new quality measures, Toyota executives defended their
quality standards that nonetheless didn't prevent a string of recalls
amounting to 10.8 million vehicles in the past year.

Toyota executives downplayed the automaker's possible role in customer
claims of unintended acceleration, the reason for the largest recalls.

In evaluating the 3,600 U.S. customer claims of "speed control" flaws in
Toyota vehicles, Sakata said the automaker had detected no instances of
unintended acceleration due to electrical glitches.

He said all claims evaluated so far were the result of a sticky accelerator
pedal, faulty installation of the floor mat, a driver stepping on the gas
instead of the brake or misuse of the car's cruise control function.

At the development level, top engineers likewise found no cause for customer
claims.

In Toyota's electronics testing lab, engineers said they never have been
able to re-create a case of unintended acceleration.

Toyota's engine control software, which contains 800,000 lines of code,
tests 280,000 "check items" per vehicle to ensure there are no bugs or
glitches, Sekido said.

He said engineers have been unable to produce a set of circumstances that
causes unintended acceleration.

"We are trying to create an adverse environment, all different scenarios,
very stressful situations," Sekido said.

There also have been allegations that electromagnetic interference could
have caused Toyotas to zoom out of control.

But Akihiko Nojima, project manager for Toyota's Electronics Laboratory
division, said he never had seen that happen in thousands of hours of
testing. In all cases of electromagnetic interference, Nojima said, the
engine went into fail-safe mode, shutting the throttle.

"No other company does such a complicated, troublesome test," Nojima said.

In the case of actual product failures, Toyota has performed troubleshooting
and enacted countermeasures as quickly as it could, Sunakawa said. He
bristled at the suggestion that Toyota dallied for two years before
recalling 270,000 Toyota and Lexus engines last week for possible valve
spring failures.

"We have done everything we could," Sunakawa said. "We didn't just sit back
on a fence. We did tests. We did what was appropriate."

Read more:
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100712/OEM01/307129949/