The Greatest Flame In The History of USENET
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Sharx!
Next: Koenigsegg CCX vs Corvette ZR1
From: Aratzio on 28 May 2010 18:32 On Sun, 23 May 2010 23:54:34 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 23 May 2010 13:54:17 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 14:50:53 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, >> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:02:13 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>> Ah, so reading your words someone has to assume the words don't >>>>>> actually mean what they mean and that they should in fact assume what >>>>>> you write does not actually mean what you wrote because you write >>>>>> gibberish that even you don't understand. >>>>> >>>>>I know you think you understood what you thought I said. >>>> >>>> Yes, I am quite clear on what you wrote: "I, Aratzio, gave the false >>>> appearance of stupidity " >>> >>>That last word should be 'intelligence'. >> >> Well, as much as I am sure you would love to go back in time and rewrite >> that sentence, it is not what you wrote. >> >>>Your 'appearence of stupidity' isn't false, bucko! >>> >>> >> So what you wrote is not what you meant as I have stated many times? >> >> "Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working." >> >> So would you like me to repeat my original parsing that you never denied? >> Since you asked: >> >> :Let us parse the word salad: >> : >> :you're == I am >> :feigning = giving false appearance >> :stupidity = lack of intelligence >> :rest assured = have confidence >> :working = successful >> : >> :So I can be confident that I am successfully faking stupidity. >> : >> :I keep telling you it helps to be able to parse the English language. >> : >> :Care to offer your parsing of the sentence? >> >> And there is began over 5 days ago with the very first offer for you to >> parse your own sentence. >> >> What a fun time. I get multiple .sig statements and you get to spin around >> and around trying to make it stop and never once, until now, offering up >> your ingorant parsing. >> >> Well, now that you have proved you either do not understand "feigning" or >> possibly "stupidity" where to we go? > >Sure thing, ignoramous. Whatever you want to think. And I use the term >loosely. If you consider rattling that dried up old pea around in your >otherwise empty braincase "thinking". > > You tried a ill thought out riff on an old saying, of which I am fond, and failed in a public, pathetic and hilarious manner. I'd have to say that it was appreciated. -- ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku proving that "reedin iz phundiemental" Message-ID: <bKmKn.3870$mj4.2360(a)newsfe08.iad> > What do you class as hate speech, goat fucker? Yup. ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku proving that stupid is painful: Message-ID: <KvmKn.15787$jt.12936(a)newsfe04.iad> ROFLMAO! Yeah, it does hurt to think at that low a level! ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku begging for mercy: Message-ID: <DyeKn.14806$Gx2.4528(a)newsfe20.iad> "A smart person would just stop bringing it up. A smart person would remove it from his sig." ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku demonstrating the fine art of the AUTOFLAME Message-ID: <48oJn.13002$rU6.11058(a)newsfe10.iad> > You are feigning intelligence. It's a lot harder than feigning stupidity. ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku showing off his word salad flaming skills: "Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working." (Don't you just hate when they catch you faking their stupidity) ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku with a short flash of self-awareness: Message-ID: <BKiIn.17617$mi.8319(a)newsfe01.iad> > Now, as to your use of "one line unthinking responses", why do you feel > those are such an unqualified success amongst the ToyotaTards? Short > attention spans, pig ignorance or just plain old fashioned low IQ stupid? > Could be all of them. -----------------------------------------------------
From: Aratzio on 28 May 2010 18:32
On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:49:35 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >Sometimes all there is to rely on is the Truth. BWAAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA -- ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku proving that "reedin iz phundiemental" Message-ID: <bKmKn.3870$mj4.2360(a)newsfe08.iad> > What do you class as hate speech, goat fucker? Yup. ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku proving that stupid is painful: Message-ID: <KvmKn.15787$jt.12936(a)newsfe04.iad> ROFLMAO! Yeah, it does hurt to think at that low a level! ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku begging for mercy: Message-ID: <DyeKn.14806$Gx2.4528(a)newsfe20.iad> "A smart person would just stop bringing it up. A smart person would remove it from his sig." ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku demonstrating the fine art of the AUTOFLAME Message-ID: <48oJn.13002$rU6.11058(a)newsfe10.iad> > You are feigning intelligence. It's a lot harder than feigning stupidity. ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku showing off his word salad flaming skills: "Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working." (Don't you just hate when they catch you faking their stupidity) ----------------------------------------------------- Hachiroku with a short flash of self-awareness: Message-ID: <BKiIn.17617$mi.8319(a)newsfe01.iad> > Now, as to your use of "one line unthinking responses", why do you feel > those are such an unqualified success amongst the ToyotaTards? Short > attention spans, pig ignorance or just plain old fashioned low IQ stupid? > Could be all of them. ----------------------------------------------------- |