The Greatest Flame In The History of USENET
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Sharx!
Next: Koenigsegg CCX vs Corvette ZR1
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 23 May 2010 14:50 On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:02:13 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> Ah, so reading your words someone has to assume the words don't >>> actually mean what they mean and that they should in fact assume what >>> you write does not actually mean what you wrote because you write >>> gibberish that even you don't understand. >> >>I know you think you understood what you thought I said. > > Yes, I am quite clear on what you wrote: "I, Aratzio, gave the false > appearance of stupidity " That last word should be 'intelligence'. Your 'appearence of stupidity' isn't false, bucko!
From: Aratzio on 23 May 2010 16:54 On Sun, 23 May 2010 14:50:53 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:02:13 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >>>> Ah, so reading your words someone has to assume the words don't >>>> actually mean what they mean and that they should in fact assume what >>>> you write does not actually mean what you wrote because you write >>>> gibberish that even you don't understand. >>> >>>I know you think you understood what you thought I said. >> >> Yes, I am quite clear on what you wrote: "I, Aratzio, gave the false >> appearance of stupidity " > >That last word should be 'intelligence'. Well, as much as I am sure you would love to go back in time and rewrite that sentence, it is not what you wrote. >Your 'appearence of stupidity' isn't false, bucko! > > So what you wrote is not what you meant as I have stated many times? "Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working." So would you like me to repeat my original parsing that you never denied? Since you asked: :Let us parse the word salad: : :you're == I am :feigning = giving false appearance :stupidity = lack of intelligence :rest assured = have confidence :working = successful : :So I can be confident that I am successfully faking stupidity. : :I keep telling you it helps to be able to parse the English language. : :Care to offer your parsing of the sentence? And there is began over 5 days ago with the very first offer for you to parse your own sentence. What a fun time. I get multiple .sig statements and you get to spin around and around trying to make it stop and never once, until now, offering up your ingorant parsing. Well, now that you have proved you either do not understand "feigning" or possibly "stupidity" where to we go? -- Hachiroku begging for mercy: Message-ID: <DyeKn.14806$Gx2.4528(a)newsfe20.iad> "A smart person would just stop bringing it up. A smart person would remove it from his sig." Hachiroku demonstrating the fine art of the AUTOFLAME Message-ID: <48oJn.13002$rU6.11058(a)newsfe10.iad> > You are feigning intelligence. It's a lot harder than feigning stupidity. Hachiroku showing off his word salad flaming skills: "Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working." (Don't you just hate when they catch you faking their stupidity) Hachiroku with a short flash of self-awareness: Message-ID: <BKiIn.17617$mi.8319(a)newsfe01.iad> > Now, as to your use of "one line unthinking responses", why do you feel > those are such an unqualified success amongst the ToyotaTards? Short > attention spans, pig ignorance or just plain old fashioned low IQ stupid? > Could be all of them.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 23 May 2010 23:54 On Sun, 23 May 2010 13:54:17 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 2010 14:50:53 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, > Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:02:13 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>> Ah, so reading your words someone has to assume the words don't >>>>> actually mean what they mean and that they should in fact assume what >>>>> you write does not actually mean what you wrote because you write >>>>> gibberish that even you don't understand. >>>> >>>>I know you think you understood what you thought I said. >>> >>> Yes, I am quite clear on what you wrote: "I, Aratzio, gave the false >>> appearance of stupidity " >> >>That last word should be 'intelligence'. > > Well, as much as I am sure you would love to go back in time and rewrite > that sentence, it is not what you wrote. > >>Your 'appearence of stupidity' isn't false, bucko! >> >> > So what you wrote is not what you meant as I have stated many times? > > "Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working." > > So would you like me to repeat my original parsing that you never denied? > Since you asked: > > :Let us parse the word salad: > : > :you're == I am > :feigning = giving false appearance > :stupidity = lack of intelligence > :rest assured = have confidence > :working = successful > : > :So I can be confident that I am successfully faking stupidity. > : > :I keep telling you it helps to be able to parse the English language. > : > :Care to offer your parsing of the sentence? > > And there is began over 5 days ago with the very first offer for you to > parse your own sentence. > > What a fun time. I get multiple .sig statements and you get to spin around > and around trying to make it stop and never once, until now, offering up > your ingorant parsing. > > Well, now that you have proved you either do not understand "feigning" or > possibly "stupidity" where to we go? Sure thing, ignoramous. Whatever you want to think. And I use the term loosely. If you consider rattling that dried up old pea around in your otherwise empty braincase "thinking".
From: pandora on 24 May 2010 05:41 On Sun, 23 May 2010 23:54:34 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 2010 13:54:17 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 14:50:53 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, >> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >> writing: >> >>>On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:02:13 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>>>> Ah, so reading your words someone has to assume the words don't >>>>>> actually mean what they mean and that they should in fact assume >>>>>> what you write does not actually mean what you wrote because you >>>>>> write gibberish that even you don't understand. >>>>> >>>>>I know you think you understood what you thought I said. >>>> >>>> Yes, I am quite clear on what you wrote: "I, Aratzio, gave the false >>>> appearance of stupidity " >>> >>>That last word should be 'intelligence'. >> >> Well, as much as I am sure you would love to go back in time and >> rewrite that sentence, it is not what you wrote. >> >>>Your 'appearence of stupidity' isn't false, bucko! >>> >>> >> So what you wrote is not what you meant as I have stated many times? >> >> "Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working." >> >> So would you like me to repeat my original parsing that you never >> denied? Since you asked: >> >> :Let us parse the word salad: >> : >> :you're == I am >> :feigning = giving false appearance >> :stupidity = lack of intelligence >> :rest assured = have confidence >> :working = successful >> : >> :So I can be confident that I am successfully faking stupidity. : >> :I keep telling you it helps to be able to parse the English language. >> : >> :Care to offer your parsing of the sentence? >> >> And there is began over 5 days ago with the very first offer for you to >> parse your own sentence. >> >> What a fun time. I get multiple .sig statements and you get to spin >> around and around trying to make it stop and never once, until now, >> offering up your ingorant parsing. >> >> Well, now that you have proved you either do not understand "feigning" >> or possibly "stupidity" where to we go? > > Sure thing, ignoramous. Whatever you want to think. And I use the term > loosely. If you consider rattling that dried up old pea around in your > otherwise empty braincase "thinking". You used that one before. Now you're really getting boring.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 24 May 2010 17:49
On Mon, 24 May 2010 04:41:29 -0500, pandora wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 2010 23:54:34 -0400, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 13:54:17 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 14:50:53 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, >>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for >>> writing: >>> >>>>On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:02:13 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Ah, so reading your words someone has to assume the words don't >>>>>>> actually mean what they mean and that they should in fact assume >>>>>>> what you write does not actually mean what you wrote because you >>>>>>> write gibberish that even you don't understand. >>>>>> >>>>>>I know you think you understood what you thought I said. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I am quite clear on what you wrote: "I, Aratzio, gave the false >>>>> appearance of stupidity " >>>> >>>>That last word should be 'intelligence'. >>> >>> Well, as much as I am sure you would love to go back in time and >>> rewrite that sentence, it is not what you wrote. >>> >>>>Your 'appearence of stupidity' isn't false, bucko! >>>> >>>> >>> So what you wrote is not what you meant as I have stated many times? >>> >>> "Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working." >>> >>> So would you like me to repeat my original parsing that you never >>> denied? Since you asked: >>> >>> :Let us parse the word salad: >>> : >>> :you're == I am >>> :feigning = giving false appearance >>> :stupidity = lack of intelligence >>> :rest assured = have confidence >>> :working = successful >>> : >>> :So I can be confident that I am successfully faking stupidity. : I >>> :keep telling you it helps to be able to parse the English language. >>> : >>> :Care to offer your parsing of the sentence? >>> >>> And there is began over 5 days ago with the very first offer for you to >>> parse your own sentence. >>> >>> What a fun time. I get multiple .sig statements and you get to spin >>> around and around trying to make it stop and never once, until now, >>> offering up your ingorant parsing. >>> >>> Well, now that you have proved you either do not understand "feigning" >>> or possibly "stupidity" where to we go? >> >> Sure thing, ignoramous. Whatever you want to think. And I use the term >> loosely. If you consider rattling that dried up old pea around in your >> otherwise empty braincase "thinking". > > You used that one before. Now you're really getting boring. Sometimes all there is to rely on is the Truth. |