Prev: Toyota issued at least 3 Drive-by-Wires TSBs earlier for 2002-03 Camrys
Next: Toyota issued at least 3 Drive-by-Wires TSBs earlier for 2002-03 Camrys
From: Tegger on 1 Dec 2009 13:17 "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in news:herv16$qpp$3(a)news.eternal-september.org: > > I flipped the spare over so that the valve was hanging down on our > Previa, but it got caked with snow and ice in bad weather, making it > an even bigger pain to check pressure How much trouble would it be for Toyota to develop some kind of special cover for the valve? That way the wheel could be mounted valve-down and you'd be able to check the pressures more conveniently. I'm imagining modifying the cap to one that's much bigger in diameter and a lot deeper, to cover the entire stem. Maybe it could have a flat flange on top so you can easily twist it off with your thumb and index finger (think of a rad drain plug). And you'd design the threads so if the thing were ever overtorqued, the threads would just skip over each other. Since the cap would be bigger in diameter, the mud buildup would end up with a large hole in it after cap removal, so you could easily get a pump and pressure gauge on the valve. -- Tegger
From: Ray O on 1 Dec 2009 14:12 "Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message news:Xns9CD48735CC9ECtegger(a)208.90.168.18... > "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in > news:herv16$qpp$3(a)news.eternal-september.org: > > >> >> I flipped the spare over so that the valve was hanging down on our >> Previa, but it got caked with snow and ice in bad weather, making it >> an even bigger pain to check pressure > > > > How much trouble would it be for Toyota to develop some kind of special > cover for the valve? That way the wheel could be mounted valve-down and > you'd be able to check the pressures more conveniently. > > I'm imagining modifying the cap to one that's much bigger in diameter and > a > lot deeper, to cover the entire stem. Maybe it could have a flat flange on > top so you can easily twist it off with your thumb and index finger (think > of a rad drain plug). And you'd design the threads so if the thing were > ever overtorqued, the threads would just skip over each other. > > Since the cap would be bigger in diameter, the mud buildup would end up > with a large hole in it after cap removal, so you could easily get a pump > and pressure gauge on the valve. > > -- > Tegger > Better patent your great idea! The other idea I've seen is an extension hose that attaches to the valve stem, with a Schrader valve on the other end so you can check pressure and add air as necessary, although it seems like this setup would be prone to leaks. -- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
From: Tegger on 1 Dec 2009 14:46 "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in news:hf3q3c$sp1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > > "Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message > news:Xns9CD48735CC9ECtegger(a)208.90.168.18... >> >> I'm imagining modifying the cap to one that's much bigger in diameter >> and a >> lot deeper, to cover the entire stem. Maybe it could have a flat >> flange on top so you can easily twist it off with your thumb and >> index finger (think of a rad drain plug). And you'd design the >> threads so if the thing were ever overtorqued, the threads would just >> skip over each other. >> >> Since the cap would be bigger in diameter, the mud buildup would end >> up with a large hole in it after cap removal, so you could easily get >> a pump and pressure gauge on the valve. >> >> -- >> Tegger >> > > Better patent your great idea! > > The other idea I've seen is an extension hose that attaches to the > valve stem, with a Schrader valve on the other end so you can check > pressure and add air as necessary, although it seems like this setup > would be prone to leaks. Here's what I'm imagining... <http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/cap-idea.gif> Would be a LOT cheaper than the extension hose idea, once you got past the mold cost. -- Tegger
From: Ray O on 1 Dec 2009 15:59
"Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message news:Xns9CD49635C6507tegger(a)208.90.168.18... > "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in > news:hf3q3c$sp1$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >> >> "Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message >> news:Xns9CD48735CC9ECtegger(a)208.90.168.18... > >>> >>> I'm imagining modifying the cap to one that's much bigger in diameter >>> and a >>> lot deeper, to cover the entire stem. Maybe it could have a flat >>> flange on top so you can easily twist it off with your thumb and >>> index finger (think of a rad drain plug). And you'd design the >>> threads so if the thing were ever overtorqued, the threads would just >>> skip over each other. >>> >>> Since the cap would be bigger in diameter, the mud buildup would end >>> up with a large hole in it after cap removal, so you could easily get >>> a pump and pressure gauge on the valve. >>> >>> -- >>> Tegger >>> >> >> Better patent your great idea! >> >> The other idea I've seen is an extension hose that attaches to the >> valve stem, with a Schrader valve on the other end so you can check >> pressure and add air as necessary, although it seems like this setup >> would be prone to leaks. > > > > Here's what I'm imagining... > <http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/cap-idea.gif> > > Would be a LOT cheaper than the extension hose idea, once you got past the > mold cost. > > > -- > Tegger > I like the KISS approach! -- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply) |