Prev: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'.
Next: More Anti-Immigrant Wingnut Fail
From: Aratzio on 8 Aug 2010 20:17
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:35:20 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
<splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>On 8/8/2010 1:29 AM, Aratzio wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:23:30 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On 8/7/2010 6:35 PM, Aratzio wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:39:18 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
>>>> grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret
>>>> probation for writing:
>>>>
>>>>>edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:d44efabd-aa3b-4cd8-947f-
>>>>>f65869f21062(a)q22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 3, 1:52 pm, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3 Aug 2010 03:13:56 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf...(a)att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>>>>> >news:4ujc569t14hncon88sjitpqeu392v9lgpe(a)4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>Wow you are stupid. Restoring the "Titles of Nobility Amendment"
>>>>>>> >>>wouldn't replace the existing 13th amendment. Sheesh.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >> Did they say that? Not AFAIK.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Feel free to explain how any group could legally go about replacing an
>>>>>>> >amendement to the constitution with a completely different one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >This ought to be good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since when do rethugs care about legal?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's THEIR party platform, after all.
>>>>>>> And rethugs lie a lot too.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cliff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can do anything with electronic voting machines. That's why the
>>>>>> repugnicans love them so dearly. You just put in the results the
>>>>>> night before. Has worked perfectly for about 15 years. The best
>>>>>> part
>>>>>> of the scam is the owners of all the electronic voting machines are
>>>>>> huge republican donors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Actually fuckwit, noone I know likes voting machines. I'm a programmer, I know
>>>>>how to rig a machine long before it shows up on election day.
>>>>>
>>>>>To bad the demorons can't even use a punch ballot.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, that must be what you define as "erudite". I can see why you were
>>>> so confused by the actual definition of "erudite" and had that whole
>>>> mixup with the word wit. Both being such foreign concepts you just
>>>> assumed they were the same thing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, that does clear it up nicely.
>>>>
>>>> Have a nice day.
>>>
>>>I say, Old Boy, these chaps certainly are some clever linguists.
>>>
>>>Have a nice day.
>>
>> Cunning no less, old Bean.
>>
>> Do take care.
>
>Rather.
>
>On the morrow.

Bit of hard cheese for the old bother, eh?

A pleasant day to you, sirrah.
From: ah on 9 Aug 2010 20:02
On 8/8/2010 8:17 PM, Aratzio wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:35:20 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On 8/8/2010 1:29 AM, Aratzio wrote:
>>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:23:30 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
>>> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>On 8/7/2010 6:35 PM, Aratzio wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:39:18 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
>>>>> grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret
>>>>> probation for writing:
>>>>>
>>>>>>edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:d44efabd-aa3b-4cd8-947f-
>>>>>>f65869f21062(a)q22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 1:52 pm, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3 Aug 2010 03:13:56 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf...(a)att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>>>>>> >news:4ujc569t14hncon88sjitpqeu392v9lgpe(a)4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>Wow you are stupid. Restoring the "Titles of Nobility Amendment"
>>>>>>>> >>>wouldn't replace the existing 13th amendment. Sheesh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> Did they say that? Not AFAIK.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >Feel free to explain how any group could legally go about replacing an
>>>>>>>> >amendement to the constitution with a completely different one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >This ought to be good.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since when do rethugs care about legal?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's THEIR party platform, after all.
>>>>>>>> And rethugs lie a lot too.
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cliff
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can do anything with electronic voting machines. That's why the
>>>>>>> repugnicans love them so dearly. You just put in the results the
>>>>>>> night before. Has worked perfectly for about 15 years. The best
>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>> of the scam is the owners of all the electronic voting machines are
>>>>>>> huge republican donors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Actually fuckwit, noone I know likes voting machines. I'm a programmer, I know
>>>>>>how to rig a machine long before it shows up on election day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>To bad the demorons can't even use a punch ballot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, that must be what you define as "erudite". I can see why you were
>>>>> so confused by the actual definition of "erudite" and had that whole
>>>>> mixup with the word wit. Both being such foreign concepts you just
>>>>> assumed they were the same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, that does clear it up nicely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a nice day.
>>>>
>>>>I say, Old Boy, these chaps certainly are some clever linguists.
>>>>
>>>>Have a nice day.
>>>
>>> Cunning no less, old Bean.
>>>
>>> Do take care.
>>
>>Rather.
>>
>>On the morrow.
>
> Bit of hard cheese for the old bother, eh?

Cabbages on the ceiling, if I do say.

>
> A pleasant day to you, sirrah.

Oh, it was; it was, Squire.
--
a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h
From: Tankfixer on 9 Aug 2010 22:17
In article <d2e2c1d4-0e5b-4d90-ad97-
c838d1858b9e(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com
says...

> We could go to a punch card system that
> can gaurantee instant, verifiable recounts.

Except that democrats can't seem to properly use a punch card...


From: Scout on 9 Aug 2010 22:22
Tankfixer wrote:
> In article <d2e2c1d4-0e5b-4d90-ad97-
> c838d1858b9e(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com
> says...
>
>> We could go to a punch card system that
>> can gaurantee instant, verifiable recounts.
>
> Except that democrats can't seem to properly use a punch card...

And that's a problem...why?


From: Tankfixer on 9 Aug 2010 22:49
In article <i3qd55$v5o$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
me4guns(a)verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net says...
>
> Tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <d2e2c1d4-0e5b-4d90-ad97-
> > c838d1858b9e(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com
> > says...
> >
> >> We could go to a punch card system that
> >> can gaurantee instant, verifiable recounts.
> >
> > Except that democrats can't seem to properly use a punch card...
>
> And that's a problem...why?

Keeps too many damn lawyers employed !
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'.
Next: More Anti-Immigrant Wingnut Fail