Prev: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'.
Next: More Anti-Immigrant Wingnut Fail
From: Aratzio on 7 Aug 2010 18:35
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:39:18 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret
probation for writing:

>edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:d44efabd-aa3b-4cd8-947f-
>f65869f21062(a)q22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Aug 3, 1:52�pm, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>> wrote:
>>> On 3 Aug 2010 03:13:56 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf...(a)att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>> >news:4ujc569t14hncon88sjitpqeu392v9lgpe(a)4ax.com:
>>>
>>> >>>Wow you are stupid. Restoring the "Titles of Nobility Amendment"
>>> >>>wouldn't replace the existing 13th amendment. Sheesh.
>>>
>>> >> � Did they say that? Not AFAIK.
>>>
>>> >Feel free to explain how any group could legally go about replacing an
>>> >amendement to the constitution with a completely different one.
>>>
>>> >This ought to be good.
>>>
>>> � Since when do rethugs care about legal?
>>>
>>> � It's THEIR party platform, after all.
>>> � And rethugs lie a lot too.
>>> --
>>> Cliff
>>
>> You can do anything with electronic voting machines. That's why the
>> repugnicans love them so dearly. You just put in the results the
>> night before. Has worked perfectly for about 15 years. The best
>> part
>> of the scam is the owners of all the electronic voting machines are
>> huge republican donors.
>>
>
>Actually fuckwit, noone I know likes voting machines. I'm a programmer, I know
>how to rig a machine long before it shows up on election day.
>
>To bad the demorons can't even use a punch ballot.

Ah, that must be what you define as "erudite". I can see why you were
so confused by the actual definition of "erudite" and had that whole
mixup with the word wit. Both being such foreign concepts you just
assumed they were the same thing.

Thanks, that does clear it up nicely.

Have a nice day.
From: ah on 7 Aug 2010 21:23
On 8/7/2010 6:35 PM, Aratzio wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:39:18 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
> grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret
> probation for writing:
>
>>edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:d44efabd-aa3b-4cd8-947f-
>>f65869f21062(a)q22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 1:52 pm, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 3 Aug 2010 03:13:56 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf...(a)att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>> >news:4ujc569t14hncon88sjitpqeu392v9lgpe(a)4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>> >>>Wow you are stupid. Restoring the "Titles of Nobility Amendment"
>>>> >>>wouldn't replace the existing 13th amendment. Sheesh.
>>>>
>>>> >> Did they say that? Not AFAIK.
>>>>
>>>> >Feel free to explain how any group could legally go about replacing an
>>>> >amendement to the constitution with a completely different one.
>>>>
>>>> >This ought to be good.
>>>>
>>>> Since when do rethugs care about legal?
>>>>
>>>> It's THEIR party platform, after all.
>>>> And rethugs lie a lot too.
>>>> --
>>>> Cliff
>>>
>>> You can do anything with electronic voting machines. That's why the
>>> repugnicans love them so dearly. You just put in the results the
>>> night before. Has worked perfectly for about 15 years. The best
>>> part
>>> of the scam is the owners of all the electronic voting machines are
>>> huge republican donors.
>>>
>>
>>Actually fuckwit, noone I know likes voting machines. I'm a programmer, I know
>>how to rig a machine long before it shows up on election day.
>>
>>To bad the demorons can't even use a punch ballot.
>
> Ah, that must be what you define as "erudite". I can see why you were
> so confused by the actual definition of "erudite" and had that whole
> mixup with the word wit. Both being such foreign concepts you just
> assumed they were the same thing.
>
> Thanks, that does clear it up nicely.
>
> Have a nice day.

I say, Old Boy, these chaps certainly are some clever linguists.

Have a nice day.
--
a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h
From: Aratzio on 8 Aug 2010 01:29
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:23:30 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
<splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:

>On 8/7/2010 6:35 PM, Aratzio wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:39:18 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
>> grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret
>> probation for writing:
>>
>>>edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:d44efabd-aa3b-4cd8-947f-
>>>f65869f21062(a)q22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> On Aug 3, 1:52 pm, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 3 Aug 2010 03:13:56 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf...(a)att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>>> >news:4ujc569t14hncon88sjitpqeu392v9lgpe(a)4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>Wow you are stupid. Restoring the "Titles of Nobility Amendment"
>>>>> >>>wouldn't replace the existing 13th amendment. Sheesh.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Did they say that? Not AFAIK.
>>>>>
>>>>> >Feel free to explain how any group could legally go about replacing an
>>>>> >amendement to the constitution with a completely different one.
>>>>>
>>>>> >This ought to be good.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since when do rethugs care about legal?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's THEIR party platform, after all.
>>>>> And rethugs lie a lot too.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cliff
>>>>
>>>> You can do anything with electronic voting machines. That's why the
>>>> repugnicans love them so dearly. You just put in the results the
>>>> night before. Has worked perfectly for about 15 years. The best
>>>> part
>>>> of the scam is the owners of all the electronic voting machines are
>>>> huge republican donors.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Actually fuckwit, noone I know likes voting machines. I'm a programmer, I know
>>>how to rig a machine long before it shows up on election day.
>>>
>>>To bad the demorons can't even use a punch ballot.
>>
>> Ah, that must be what you define as "erudite". I can see why you were
>> so confused by the actual definition of "erudite" and had that whole
>> mixup with the word wit. Both being such foreign concepts you just
>> assumed they were the same thing.
>>
>> Thanks, that does clear it up nicely.
>>
>> Have a nice day.
>
>I say, Old Boy, these chaps certainly are some clever linguists.
>
>Have a nice day.

Cunning no less, old Bean.

Do take care.


From: Cliff on 8 Aug 2010 02:14
On 6 Aug 2010 23:15:31 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf154(a)att.net> wrote:

>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>news:vvui565jd65cmi9aieipfa9guj07c603lo(a)4ax.com:
>
>> On 3 Aug 2010 19:48:28 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf154(a)att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>news:polg561htvedj8kdvm7uc337rf61eb22nm(a)4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On 3 Aug 2010 03:13:56 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf154(a)att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>>>news:4ujc569t14hncon88sjitpqeu392v9lgpe(a)4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Wow you are stupid. Restoring the "Titles of Nobility Amendment"
>>>>>>>wouldn't replace the existing 13th amendment. Sheesh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did they say that? Not AFAIK.
>>>>>
>>>>>Feel free to explain how any group could legally go about replacing
>an
>>>>>amendement to the constitution with a completely different one.
>>>>>
>>>>>This ought to be good.
>>>>
>>>> Since when do rethugs care about legal?
>>>
>>>I see, the Iowa Republicans will use dark magic to change the
>>>constitution and enslave 1/4 of the population.
>>
>> I'm not responsible for the superstitions & lies of rethugs.
>> These are your buddies, right?
>
>Your failure to explain how some plank in the Iowa Republican party
>platform translates into Republicans restoring slavery is noted.

Have you let the rethugs in Iowa know you have declared them non-rethugs?
How did they react?
They sound pretty loonie already to me.

>>
>>>
>>>And people say that you're crazy? Don't you believe them.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's THEIR party platform, after all.
>>>
>>>No it's not. The article you linked to but obviously never read was
>>>about the Iowa Republican platform, not the RNC.
>>
>> NOW you are claiming that Iowa rethugs are not rethugs.
>
>How so?

"some plank in the Iowa Republican party " .....

>> Makes perfect sense to you I suppose.
>
>More than your magnificent jump to the conclusion that restoring TONA
>would somehow result in slavery. Do you have any idea how ignorant you
>would have to be of the Constitution in order to arrive at your
>conclusion?

Well, if you replace the existing 13th amendment with the
other version ..... would Obama be their slave? Or just
Hispanics these days?

>> Is it because "Iowa" has too many letters?
>
>Sticks and stones.

I did not make up the planks of rethugs.
Clearly a pack of morons did. As usual.

>>
>>>Second, the Iowa
>>>platform doesn't call for slavery.
>>
>> Just doing away with the laws against it.
>
>Nope.

Just in Iowa?

>> I see.
>
>No you don't.
>
>> What purpose might that serve? Let me guess ...
>
>Read the history of the act for your first clue.

The one they want instead of what we have. I see.

>> IIRC Someone claimed this was anti-Obama stuff ... Was he
>> against manure & BS too?
>
>That was in the article that you cited as proof that Republicans are for
>restoring slavery. An absurd claim that you have yet to support.

You could ask your Birther Queen about it. Or Palin. Or Rush or Faux.
Remember that they lie & take it from there ....

>>>But feel free to read the platform
>>>and cite where you think it calls for re-establishing slavery.
>>>
>>>> And rethugs lie a lot too.
>>>
>>>That's some powerful argument you have there. Do they have cooties
>too?
>>
>> Ask them. Then suspect the opposite of their answer.
>> See how simple it all is?
>
>http://www.imao.us/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/DamnCat-IQ.jpg

"Error 404 - Not Found"

>I suppose I do now...
--
Cliff
From: ah on 8 Aug 2010 16:35
On 8/8/2010 1:29 AM, Aratzio wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:23:30 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, ah
> <splifingate(a)gmail.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On 8/7/2010 6:35 PM, Aratzio wrote:
>>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:39:18 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
>>> grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) got double secret
>>> probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>edspyhill01 <edspyhill01(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:d44efabd-aa3b-4cd8-947f-
>>>>f65869f21062(a)q22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 3, 1:52 pm, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 3 Aug 2010 03:13:56 GMT, D Murphy <dmurf...(a)att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>>>> >news:4ujc569t14hncon88sjitpqeu392v9lgpe(a)4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>Wow you are stupid. Restoring the "Titles of Nobility Amendment"
>>>>>> >>>wouldn't replace the existing 13th amendment. Sheesh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Did they say that? Not AFAIK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Feel free to explain how any group could legally go about replacing an
>>>>>> >amendement to the constitution with a completely different one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >This ought to be good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since when do rethugs care about legal?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's THEIR party platform, after all.
>>>>>> And rethugs lie a lot too.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cliff
>>>>>
>>>>> You can do anything with electronic voting machines. That's why the
>>>>> repugnicans love them so dearly. You just put in the results the
>>>>> night before. Has worked perfectly for about 15 years. The best
>>>>> part
>>>>> of the scam is the owners of all the electronic voting machines are
>>>>> huge republican donors.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Actually fuckwit, noone I know likes voting machines. I'm a programmer, I know
>>>>how to rig a machine long before it shows up on election day.
>>>>
>>>>To bad the demorons can't even use a punch ballot.
>>>
>>> Ah, that must be what you define as "erudite". I can see why you were
>>> so confused by the actual definition of "erudite" and had that whole
>>> mixup with the word wit. Both being such foreign concepts you just
>>> assumed they were the same thing.
>>>
>>> Thanks, that does clear it up nicely.
>>>
>>> Have a nice day.
>>
>>I say, Old Boy, these chaps certainly are some clever linguists.
>>
>>Have a nice day.
>
> Cunning no less, old Bean.
>
> Do take care.

Rather.

On the morrow.
--
a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: {BS} The View co host says Obama visit a bit too 'fluffy'.
Next: More Anti-Immigrant Wingnut Fail