Party of No
in [Toyota]
|
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 25 May 2010 08:58 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:EYKKn.40360$wV.25631(a)newsfe11.iad... > On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:54:25 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >> news:urDKn.30582$wV2.19022(a)newsfe23.iad... >>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:39:32 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>> >>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message >>>> news:diCKn.74930$0M5.59856(a)newsfe07.iad... >>>>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:37:30 -0400, Cliff wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Party of No: How Republicans and the Right Have Tried to Thwart >>>>>> All Social >>>>>> Progress" >>>>> >>>>> You spelled "Socialism" wrong. >>>> >>>> >>>> Your mom is a socialist and she likes it. >>> >>> Mom lame. Good job, Joey. >>> Taking Aratzio lessons in incontiinence? >> >> >> So, you say your mom gets absolutely NO benefits from the government. Are >> you absolutely sure? > > When did I ever say that? Go clean up your room NOW.
From: CharlesGrozny on 25 May 2010 09:26 "Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message news:8615evFad8U1(a)mid.individual.net... > On 2010-05-24 18:59:15 -0700, nm5k(a)wt.net said: > >> We need lots more NO! in this country. >> Starting with that NO brains, twinkle toed, elitist bunch that invaded >> Washington and seem intent on destroying this country before 2012 >> rolls around. > > I really, really miss Bill Clinton. As much of a philanderer as he > was/is, I never had any doubts about his loyalty to the Constitution. > > The guy squatting in the WH right now is of a different sort. Until now, > I never worried about the future of our country or its continuance. > Unfortunately, Bill Clinton's ultimate loyalty to the constitution is just as bad as this guys. We, the voters, didn't let him act on it. We almost got Hillary care, remember? Ahh, how soon they forget. Charles Grozny
From: CharlesGrozny on 25 May 2010 10:54 "Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message news:8621lvFg43U1(a)mid.individual.net... > On 2010-05-25 06:26:53 -0700, "CharlesGrozny" <n5hsr(a)hotmail.com> said: > >> >> "Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message >> news:8615evFad8U1(a)mid.individual.net... >>> On 2010-05-24 18:59:15 -0700, nm5k(a)wt.net said: >>> >>>> We need lots more NO! in this country. >>>> Starting with that NO brains, twinkle toed, elitist bunch that invaded >>>> Washington and seem intent on destroying this country before 2012 >>>> rolls around. >>> >>> I really, really miss Bill Clinton. As much of a philanderer as he >>> was/is, I never had any doubts about his loyalty to the Constitution. >>> >>> The guy squatting in the WH right now is of a different sort. Until >>> now, I never worried about the future of our country or its continuance. >>> >> >> Unfortunately, Bill Clinton's ultimate loyalty to the constitution is >> just as bad as this guys. >> We, the voters, didn't let him act on it. We almost got Hillary care, >> remember? >> >> Ahh, how soon they forget. > > It's all relative, Charles. I never considered Clinton's behavior > treasonous. > His behavior long before he was president was treasonous. I lived in Arkansas while he was Governor, remember? Charles Grozny
From: The PHANTOM on 25 May 2010 13:51 On May 25, 9:54 am, "CharlesGrozny" <n5...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > "Conscience" <nobama@göv.com> wrote in message > > news:8621lvFg43U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > > > > On 2010-05-25 06:26:53 -0700, "CharlesGrozny" <n5...(a)hotmail.com> said: > > >> "Conscience" <nobama@göv.com> wrote in message > >>news:8615evFad8U1(a)mid.individual.net... > >>> On 2010-05-24 18:59:15 -0700, n...(a)wt.net said: > > >>>> We need lots more NO! in this country. > >>>> Starting with that NO brains, twinkle toed, elitist bunch that invaded > >>>> Washington and seem intent on destroying this country before 2012 > >>>> rolls around. > > >>> I really, really miss Bill Clinton. As much of a philanderer as he > >>> was/is, I never had any doubts about his loyalty to the Constitution. > > >>> The guy squatting in the WH right now is of a different sort. Until > >>> now, I never worried about the future of our country or its continuance. > > >> Unfortunately, Bill Clinton's ultimate loyalty to the constitution is > >> just as bad as this guys. > >> We, the voters, didn't let him act on it. We almost got Hillary care, > >> remember? > > >> Ahh, how soon they forget. > > > It's all relative, Charles. I never considered Clinton's behavior > > treasonous. > > His behavior long before he was president was treasonous. I lived in > Arkansas while he was Governor, remember? > > Charles Grozny- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - And Russia just to avoid the draft.
From: Cliff on 25 May 2010 21:00
On Tue, 25 May 2010 06:41:29 GMT, "Sharx35" <sharx35(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >"Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >news:dholv5hai7rfj9qdgfave6fr9vm3i3a6ur(a)4ax.com... >> >> http://www.alternet.org/news/146965/party_of_no%3A_how_republicans_and_the_right_have_tried_to_thwart_all_social_progress >> "Party of No: How Republicans and the Right Have Tried to Thwart All >> Social >> Progress" >> "You name it, the right has opposed it: civil rights, school >> desegregation, >> women's rights, labor organizing, the minimum wage, LGBT rights, welfare, >> immigrant rights. " >> [ >> May 23, 2010 As much as they may grumble, there is a legitimate reason >> why the >> Republicans have been labeled the "Party of No." For decades, the party's >> kneejerk stance has been to oppose any legislation or policy involving >> social, >> economic or political progress. >> >> You name it, the right has opposed it: civil rights, school desegregation, >> women's rights, labor organizing, the minimum wage, social security, LGBT >> rights, welfare, immigrant rights, public education, reproductive rights, >> Medicare, Medicaid. And through the years the right invoked hysterical >> rhetoric >> in opposition, predicting that implementing any such policies would result >> in >> the end-of-family-free-enterprise-God-America on the one hand, and the >> imposition of atheism-socialism-Nazism on the other. >> >> Republicans are obstructionist for one simple reason: it's a winning >> strategy. >> Opposing progressive policies allows the right to actualize the ideals >> that both >> motivate and define their base. Rightist ideologies are not without >> sophistication, but right-wing politicians and media figures boil them >> down to a >> crude Manichean dualism to mobilize supporters based on group difference: >> good >> versus evil, us versus them. By demonizing and scapegoating politically >> marginal >> groups, the right is able to define "real Americans," who are good, versus >> those >> defined as parasites, illegitimate and internal threats, who are evil. >> ..... >> Sara Diamond neatly summarizes the politics behind the right's >> obstructionism in >> her book, Roads To Dominion. She writes, "To be right-wing means to >> support the >> state in its capacity as enforcer of order and to oppose the state as >> distributor of wealth and power downward and more equitably in society." >> (emphasis in original) These principles, in turn, flow from four >> interrelated >> political philosophies that animate the modern right: militarism, >> neoliberalism, >> traditionalism and white supremacism. >> .... >> ] > > >Bullshit. IOW Truth. Find those "WMDs" yet? -- Cliff |