From: Marc Gerges on
Bob & Holly Wilson <bwilson4use(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks to Google books, I picked up the following graphs from:
>
> Gyenes, L. and Mitchell, C.G.B., "The Effect of Vehicle-Road Interaction
> on Fuel Consumption," Vehicle-Road Interaction, ASTM STP 1225, B.T.
> Kulakawski, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials,
> Philadelphia, 1994, pp. 225-239.
>
> http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_tire_010.jpg

It actually took me a minute or two to figure out the units - and even
then I'm not quite sure.

The kN/m^2 are bar. 1 bar=10000 Pa = more or less atmospheric pressure

Keep in mind though, that when referring to bars, one usually refers to
relative pressure. If my tire has 2 bars, it means it has 2 bars
overpressure vs the atmosphere. Therefore I'm somewhat unsure about the
graph. And I guess that's why scientists love SI units like Pa ;-)

> http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_tire_020.jpg

No real relevance - I wouldn't expect Prii to come with anything but
radial tires. I have a 40 year old classic that came with radials back
then :-)

> Tire rolling resistance is not a linear function with speed and
> inflation pressure and these charts give a clue about tire drag.

Keep in mind though that the higher the speed goes, the less important
is tire drag relatively to air resistance. Latest at quick country road
pace (100 km/h, about 60 mph) I wouldn't care so much about tire drag
and more about keeping windows closed and not having any added air
resistance. But then, a riced Prius with spoilers and the like is rather
seldom.

cu
.\\arc
From: Bob & Holly Wilson on
Marc Gerges <marc.gerges(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Bob & Holly Wilson <bwilson4use(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks to Google books, I picked up the following graphs from:
> >
> > Gyenes, L. and Mitchell, C.G.B., "The Effect of Vehicle-Road Interaction
> > on Fuel Consumption," Vehicle-Road Interaction, ASTM STP 1225, B.T.
> > Kulakawski, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials,
> > Philadelphia, 1994, pp. 225-239.
> >
> > http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_tire_010.jpg
>
> It actually took me a minute or two to figure out the units - and even
> then I'm not quite sure.
>
> The kN/m^2 are bar. 1 bar=10000 Pa = more or less atmospheric pressure
>
> Keep in mind though, that when referring to bars, one usually refers to
> relative pressure. If my tire has 2 bars, it means it has 2 bars
> overpressure vs the atmosphere. Therefore I'm somewhat unsure about the
> graph. And I guess that's why scientists love SI units like Pa ;-)

I found this converter page:
http://www.centauro-owners.com/articles/psibar.html

So at 1 bar, your running ~14.5 psi relative to the outside air?
bar - psi
1 - 14.5
2 - 29
3 - 43.5
4 - 58

>
> > http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_tire_020.jpg
>
> No real relevance - I wouldn't expect Prii to come with anything but
> radial tires. I have a 40 year old classic that came with radials back
> then :-)

Use just the radial tire coefficient of drag.

>
> > Tire rolling resistance is not a linear function with speed and
> > inflation pressure and these charts give a clue about tire drag.
>
> Keep in mind though that the higher the speed goes, the less important
> is tire drag relatively to air resistance. Latest at quick country road
> pace (100 km/h, about 60 mph) I wouldn't care so much about tire drag
> and more about keeping windows closed and not having any added air
> resistance. But then, a riced Prius with spoilers and the like is rather
> seldom.

There are non-linear effects that occur between 65-75 mph that can run
my NH11 Prius mileage from a high of 53 MPG at 65 mph down to 39 MPG at
75 mph. Apparently tires also make a contribution along with a control
law. This fall off in mileage does not follow the V**2, aerodynamic drag
profile.

The practical effect is to identify another performance limitation along
with the control law that limits MG1 to 6,500 rpm. Larger diameter tires
and wheels, say 10% larger, would still be subject to radial tire drag
at higher speeds. However, they would shift the MG1 speed management
laws up 10%. If this brings 50 mph through 75 mph, the results would be
most excellent.

Today, I'm using Sumitomo P175/65R14, T4, 919 rev/mi. It may be possible
to fit P205/70R14, 831 rev/mi. and cut the vehicle rpm by 10% at any
given speed. Thus an indicated 65 mph would be an actual 71 mph. This
could defer the MG1 rpm control law but still be subject to the
increased tire drag.

Bob Wilson
From: Bob & Holly Wilson on
Elmo P. Shagnasty <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote:

> In article <1i9niau.1d5kfmu3377upN%bwilson4use(a)hotmail.com>,
> bwilson4use(a)hotmail.com (Bob & Holly Wilson) wrote:
>
> > > You know, Mythbusters showed that . . .
> >
> > Exploding truck tires, can be a hazard; breathing air from a tire
> > underwater doesn't work; and driving in reverse on ice is ineffective
> > tire traction improver. However, Gyenes and Mitchell have shown:
> >
> > > http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_tire_010.jpg
> > > Tire inflation lookup table:
> > > kN/m**2 - psi
> > > 200 - 29
> > > 225 - 33
> > > 250 - 36
> > > 275 - 40
> > > 300 - 44
> > > 325 - 47
> > > 350 - 51
> > > 375 - 53
> > >
> > > http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_tire_020.jpg
> > > Speed lookup table:
> > > km/h - miles per hour
> > > 80 - 50
> > > 90 - 56
> > > 100 - 62
> > > 110 - 68
> > > 120 - 75
>
> You didn't quote me all the way.

I stayed on topic, "Optimal Tire Pressure" and ignored the rest. Perhaps
you might start a thread on tailgating.

>. . .
> So in addition to pumping those tires up to 1000psi to get crisper
> steering and handling, in addition to the fuel economy benefits,
>. . .

Posted on the sidewalls is the maximum pressure. For my Sumitomo T4s
that pressure is 51 psi. BTW, there is an essay by the Tire Rack:

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=1

"Disadvantages of Overinflation

An overinflated tire is stiff and unyielding and the size of its
footprint in contact with the road is reduced. If a vehicle's tires are
overinflated by 6 psi, they could be damaged more easily when
encountering potholes or debris in the road, as well as experience
irregular tread wear. Higher inflated tires cannot isolate road
irregularities as well causing the vehicle to ride harsher and transmit
more noise into its interior. . . . "

This is something folks who live with bad roads should consider.
Fortunately, North Alabama is blessed with good roads that seldom have
potholes. With good roads and a morning commute that seldom exceeds 55
mph, I run my tires at their maximum pressure rating, 51 psi front and
49 psi rear.

". . . However, higher inflation pressures reduce rolling resistance
slightly and typically provide a slight improvement in steering response
and cornering stability. This is why participants who use street tires
in autocrosses, track events and road races run higher than normal
inflation pressures."

The reduced rolling resistance pays at the pump but the steering and
cornering stability is especially nice. I regularly take turns and
curves at +5 to +10 mph over what other vehicles can handle. For
example, one of my favorite curves is at:

34 42' 31.00" -86 40' 11.05" (use Google maps)

This curve is rated at 45 mph for most cars. But I enter it at 55-60 mph
on cruise control and don't blink an eye. Tailgaters often wind up
backing off quite quickly because they have to.

Bob Wilson

From: Marc Gerges on
Bob & Holly Wilson <bwilson4use(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Keep in mind though, that when referring to bars, one usually refers to
>> relative pressure. If my tire has 2 bars, it means it has 2 bars
>> overpressure vs the atmosphere. Therefore I'm somewhat unsure about the
>> graph. And I guess that's why scientists love SI units like Pa ;-)
>
> I found this converter page:
> http://www.centauro-owners.com/articles/psibar.html
>
> So at 1 bar, your running ~14.5 psi relative to the outside air?
> bar - psi
> 1 - 14.5
> 2 - 29
> 3 - 43.5
> 4 - 58

Yep, seems like it.

>
>>
>> > http://hiwaay.net/~bzwilson/prius/pri_tire_020.jpg
>>
>> No real relevance - I wouldn't expect Prii to come with anything but
>> radial tires. I have a 40 year old classic that came with radials back
>> then :-)
>
> Use just the radial tire coefficient of drag.

Obviously there's a bunch of development going in them, and I'd expect
tires built for low resistance to score differently to tires built with
other characteristics in focus.

The tires my car came with are V rated, that's 240 km/h, around 150 mph.
I presume that's not because they'd expect me to drive that fast, but
because they wanted the stiffest possible tire construction for
minimizing rolling resistance.

cu
.\\arc
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: attelage
Next: MFD Problems and DICE iPod Interface