Prev: englaciated corolla
Next: Toyota sued in Calif. over acceleration deaths
From: Mike Hunter on 13 Feb 2010 13:06
(Cross postings deleted, automatically)

"Canuck57" <Canuck57(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MMBdn.94535$1m3.78939(a)newsfe11.iad...
> On 13/02/2010 10:11 AM, clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:35:23 -0500, "Ed Pawlowski"
more.


From: Hachiroku on 13 Feb 2010 19:23
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:06:33 -0500, Mike Hunter wrote:

> (Cross postings deleted, automatically)
>
> "Canuck57" <Canuck57(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:MMBdn.94535$1m3.78939(a)newsfe11.iad...
>> On 13/02/2010 10:11 AM, clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote:
>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:35:23 -0500, "Ed Pawlowski"
> more.


Will you TURN THIS OFF!!!!!!!!!!
If you're going to reply to cross posted message, REPLY!
If not, CUT IT OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!

From: Jeff Strickland on 13 Feb 2010 14:34

"Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message
news:4b76d539$0$10189$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net...
> (Cross posting deleted, automatically)
>


I don't know what you're doing, but whatever it is, stop. Your deleted
crosspostings are not being deleted at all, and it appears that others in
the "deleted" groups are replying to alt.toyota. How they do that is beyond
me, but your attempts to stop the cross posts automatically are not working.

The rule I follow is that I never initiatate a cross post because that's
just rude, but when a rude person starts one, I can Reply and leave the
participants intact, or I can manually remove all of the groups that 1.) I
don't care about talking to, or 2.) remove all of the groups except the one
that I'm in at the moment. In any case, if there really is a deleted
crosspost, then nobody should even know that you deleted them.

In a related matter, alt.autos.toyota never saw the cross post until you
made your Reply, and proclaimed to the world that cross postings were
deleted automatically, and then all we saw was cross postings with your name
on them. Maybe you should rethink the whole righteous-indignation thing that
you have going which makes you want to save the world from rude people that
cross post.




From: Mike Hunter on 13 Feb 2010 15:32
(Cross posting deleted, automatically)

Once again our friend Canuck57 is telling us the sky is falling LOL


"Canuck57" <Canuck57(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
news:A_Cdn.156790$uH1.146613(a)newsfe25.iad...
> On 13/02/2010 11:05 AM, Tom wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Canuck57" <Canuck57(a)nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:MMBdn.94535$1m3.78939(a)newsfe11.iad...
>>> On 13/02/2010 10:11 AM, clare(a)snyder.on.ca wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:35:23 -0500, "Ed Pawlowski"
>>>> <esp(a)snetnospam.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Clive"<Clive(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>> news:yo4nNoEpErdLFwLS(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk...
>>>>>> In message<4hbdn5ds7oa4lugoakmne3cvqhvjic4a8c(a)4ax.com>, PeterD
>>>>>> <peter2(a)hipson.net> writes
>>>>>>> Why is it that people don't understand that recalls are for safety
>>>>>>> defects not product quality? I don't think we see many manifolds
>>>>>>> causing accidents!
>>>>>> A defective manifold could well be leaking poisonous fumes into
>>>>>> your car
>>>>>> that you can't smell, but will send you to sleep and into a tree to
>>>>>> kill
>>>>>> you if everyone else is lucky, or you just might smash into an
>>>>>> oncoming
>>>>>> vehicle killing both you and them, is that fair?
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Clive
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The GM problem was intake manifolds. They don't leak any fumes. They
>>>>> may
>>>>> be a safety device because they suck in poisonous or explosive
>>>>> fumes. They
>>>>> saved my life!
>>>> The leaky intakes usually leak oil and/or antifreeze onto the engine.
>>>> Hot oil makes smoke/fumes and CAN cause fires. Antifreeze leaks can
>>>> "fume" the windsheild -
>>>> Neither is a COMMON result, but tboth are POSSIBLE.
>>>> Just like a stuck wide open throttle is not a COMMON occurrence on a
>>>> Toyota - but it is POSSIBLE
>>>
>>> Trouble is now tha tthe NHTSA and Governmetn motors have the same
>>> boss, really can't say it is impartial any more.
>>
>> Do you know that as a fact or it just another of your WAGs
>
> Are you stupid? Don't answe, it is obvious. But just in case there is
> hope.
>
> GM, Governemtn Motors is majority owned by the taxpayers. Government run,
> governmetn chooses the board. Government, the same government chooses who
> runs NHTSA and chooses it's management and director.
>
> Now to say that impartiality is guaranteed, is stupid. To say Toyota with
> 1/3rd the number of defects compared to Government Motors all of a sudden
> changes in one year des sort of stinks of bias and McCarthyism.


From: Jeff Strickland on 13 Feb 2010 17:22

"Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote in message
news:4b770a93$0$10149$ce5e7886(a)news-radius.ptd.net...
> (Cross posting deleted, automatically)
>
> Once again our friend Canuck57 is telling us the sky is falling LOL
>

Mike, your computer is out of control. Remember, 2001, A Space Odessey? HAL
is taking over, Dave.






First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: englaciated corolla
Next: Toyota sued in Calif. over acceleration deaths