Prev: Women in a uproar, a glimpse into national health care
Next: Garmin nüvi 255W 4.3-Inch Widescreen Portable GPS Navigator
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 18 Nov 2009 15:59
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:he1m7l$sil$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:nYYMm.16991$We2.2754(a)newsfe09.iad...
>>>
>>> I don't know how you can say that you read so voraciously, then say that
>>> I don't read at all after I just got through giving you a synopsis of
>>> the book you told me to read.
>>
>>
>> Your synopsis cannot be accurate without reading the book. You copied the
>> material from someone else.
>>
>> Why do you hate reading?
>>
>
> Or, I could know what I'm talking about, and have spanked you yet again.


I own the book. When you've read it, I'll ask you for a short quote from a
particular page to be sure you're not lying.

Goodbye for now.


From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 18 Nov 2009 12:32
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:44:27 -0800, Jeff Strickland wrote:

> So?
>
> I thought you were talking about the direct Saudi support of 9/11. It is
> difficult to have a conversation with you because you bounce around so
> often, and so wide.

If your head were rubber, you would, too.



From: Jeff Strickland on 18 Nov 2009 19:55

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:IeZMm.19003$ky1.12508(a)newsfe14.iad...
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:he1m7l$sil$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> news:nYYMm.16991$We2.2754(a)newsfe09.iad...
>>>>
>>>> I don't know how you can say that you read so voraciously, then say
>>>> that I don't read at all after I just got through giving you a synopsis
>>>> of the book you told me to read.
>>>
>>>
>>> Your synopsis cannot be accurate without reading the book. You copied
>>> the material from someone else.
>>>
>>> Why do you hate reading?
>>>
>>
>> Or, I could know what I'm talking about, and have spanked you yet again.
>
>
> I own the book. When you've read it, I'll ask you for a short quote from a
> particular page to be sure you're not lying.
>
> Goodbye for now.
>

I'm not gonna play that game. It's entirely irrelevent to the fact that
you've been spanked.

Bottom line, I know what you know whether I read the book or not. There are
very few subjects where you have a greater knowledge than I have. Proof of
that is, you are the one that has to resort to attacks on my wife and mother
because you can't keep up.










From: JoeSpareBedroom on 18 Nov 2009 20:41
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:he251n$2p2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:IeZMm.19003$ky1.12508(a)newsfe14.iad...
>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:he1m7l$sil$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>> news:nYYMm.16991$We2.2754(a)newsfe09.iad...
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know how you can say that you read so voraciously, then say
>>>>> that I don't read at all after I just got through giving you a
>>>>> synopsis of the book you told me to read.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your synopsis cannot be accurate without reading the book. You copied
>>>> the material from someone else.
>>>>
>>>> Why do you hate reading?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Or, I could know what I'm talking about, and have spanked you yet again.
>>
>>
>> I own the book. When you've read it, I'll ask you for a short quote from
>> a particular page to be sure you're not lying.
>>
>> Goodbye for now.
>>
>
> I'm not gonna play that game. It's entirely irrelevent to the fact that
> you've been spanked.
>
> Bottom line, I know what you know whether I read the book or not.


Impossible. You have chosen not to obtain new information. We both know why
you do that. You only listen to sources which tell you what you already
know, therefore you end up with no new information. You said so yourself.
Remember?

I remember.

"I listen to those that say the things I already know."
Jeff Strickland

There is no other possible interpretation of your statement.


From: Jeff Strickland on 18 Nov 2009 20:49

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:kn1Nm.30360$X01.27713(a)newsfe07.iad...
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:he251n$2p2$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> news:IeZMm.19003$ky1.12508(a)newsfe14.iad...
>>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:he1m7l$sil$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>
>>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:nYYMm.16991$We2.2754(a)newsfe09.iad...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know how you can say that you read so voraciously, then say
>>>>>> that I don't read at all after I just got through giving you a
>>>>>> synopsis of the book you told me to read.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your synopsis cannot be accurate without reading the book. You copied
>>>>> the material from someone else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you hate reading?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Or, I could know what I'm talking about, and have spanked you yet
>>>> again.
>>>
>>>
>>> I own the book. When you've read it, I'll ask you for a short quote from
>>> a particular page to be sure you're not lying.
>>>
>>> Goodbye for now.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not gonna play that game. It's entirely irrelevent to the fact that
>> you've been spanked.
>>
>> Bottom line, I know what you know whether I read the book or not.
>
>
> Impossible. You have chosen not to obtain new information. We both know
> why you do that. You only listen to sources which tell you what you
> already know, therefore you end up with no new information. You said so
> yourself. Remember?
>

You have not offered any new information. I already know what Baer has to
say, I've been saying most of it for several years now.

All of what he says is accurate, I wonder at some of the conclusions he
draws. He tends to blame the US for the problems in the Arab World, but he
does it right after explaining at length that the leaders of the Arab World
are corrupt, and they are corrupt because of American policy. My position is
that the Arab leaders were corrupt already, but because we can't meddle in
the internal affairs of these countries, then we have to deal with the
corrupt leaders that are there long before we arrived, and remain long after
we leave.










First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Women in a uproar, a glimpse into national health care
Next: Garmin nüvi 255W 4.3-Inch Widescreen Portable GPS Navigator