From: Mike Hunter on
Maybe you should suggest that to Toyota. Perhaps then they would not have
had to recall 9,500,000 vehicles all over the world and be facing million in
fines and billions in litigation.


"Ron Peterson" <ron(a)shell.core.com> wrote in message
news:54c66386-6d27-44d0-ba9b-a60fb10ff888(a)z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 5, 8:11 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:

> I disagree. Without the ads, GM would hardly sell any cars.

Consumers go to the Web to get information on cars now, advertisement
costs could be better spent making better vehicles.

--
Ron


From: dr_jeff on
Ron Peterson wrote:
> On Apr 5, 8:11 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>
>> I disagree. Without the ads, GM would hardly sell any cars.
>
> Consumers go to the Web to get information on cars now, advertisement
> costs could be better spent making better vehicles.
>
> --
> Ron

Except, without advertising, people won't know about the cars.
Advertising is part of selling the cars. It's a cost of doing business.

Jeff
From: Ed Pawlowski on

"dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
news:QdWdncRNWPyPGSbWnZ2dnUVZ_sYAAAAA(a)giganews.com...
> Ron Peterson wrote:
>> On Apr 5, 8:11 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> I disagree. Without the ads, GM would hardly sell any cars.
>>
>> Consumers go to the Web to get information on cars now, advertisement
>> costs could be better spent making better vehicles.
>>
>> --
>> Ron
>
> Except, without advertising, people won't know about the cars. Advertising
> is part of selling the cars. It's a cost of doing business.
>
> Jeff

At the cost stated, it is about 1/25th of the cost of the average vehicle.
A friend of mine works for a major cosmetics company and he says 40% of
their revenue goes to advertising.

From: Ed Pawlowski on

"jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote

>
> that doesn't explain it. g.m. have been making profits on their well
> managed and well run european operations, and european pension/health care
> costs [along with virtually every other cost too] are /way/ higher than
> here.

Costs have little affect on profitability. Selling price does. You have
to know both to do a comparison between US and Europe

From: dr_jeff on
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
> "jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote
>
>>
>> that doesn't explain it. g.m. have been making profits on their well
>> managed and well run european operations, and european pension/health
>> care costs [along with virtually every other cost too] are /way/
>> higher than here.
>
> Costs have little affect on profitability. Selling price does. You
> have to know both to do a comparison between US and Europe

So a car that costs $100,000 to build will be real profitable at
$25,000? Both costs and selling price are part of profitability. In
fact, profit = selling price - costs.

Jeff