Prev: {BS} RETARD to be removed from all government documents
Next: cell phones while driving
From: in2dadark on 5 Feb 2010 18:57
On Feb 5, 1:39 am, Tegger <inva...(a)invalid.inv> wrote:
> in2dadark <in2dad...(a)yahoo.com> wrote innews:1cbda79e-90ba-4eb1-a08c-1ca76340c9ab(a)j31g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 6:49 pm, Tegger <inva...(a)invalid.inv> wrote:
> >> in2dadark <in2dad...(a)yahoo.com> wrote
> >> innews:05aef053-2e2c-4d81-a688-a31c
> > b20a1...(a)g29g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> >http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/residents-lawmakers-angry-as-
>
> >> Are you still on about that nonsense?
>
> >> That Alonso woman in your link faces far more danger to her health
> >> from her gross obesity than from any phantoms in the air.
>
> >> Who on earth would make an obese woman a director of health? Does she
> >> smoke, too?
>
> >> --
> >> Tegger
>
> > We'll see if I'm right. There are more and more stories about these
> > things instead of less and less.
>
> That's because the alarmists/activists are tireless in their fanaticism.
> There are some subjects, health and environment among them, where
> factual information is almost completely drowned out by the activists.
>
> The EMF thing was discredited in the mid-'90s, and nothing's changed
> since then.
>
> > And less and less people challenge me when I say it not than before...
>
> Because it's a fading fad; EMF is old hat. The alarmists are on to other
> fears these days.
>
> But now that the Global Warming thing is proving to be the invented scam
> I said it was all along, EMF may make a comeback as the alarmists look
> for something else to scare the public with.
>
> In my area the primary impetus for the EMF scare is plain old NIMBY-ism.
> Towers are ugly. Nobody wants them near their houses because they look
> icky. So they dredge up the old EMF nonsense to justify why they don't
> want towers near where they can see them.
>
> We've also got a wacko who's raging against a new gas-fired "peaker
> plant" that's being proposed for my part of the province. He's ranting
> about some sort of cancer causing nano-particles that are supposedly
> produced by the burning of natural gas (which he's careful to refer to
> as "methane"). Except that just about every industrial furnace, and most
> urban and suburban house furnaces /already/ burn "methane". He's put ads
> in the paper, and sends letters to the editor. Nothing stops the wackos,
> not even facts.
>
> > Now you'll come back with a tin foil
> > hat comment? Please have something better..? Please..
>
> People are easy to scare when they know nothing about the subject.
> That's what the alarmists count on.
>
> Some time ago I posted two links refuting the claims of the
> alarmists/activists.
>
> Here they are again:
> <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1566444/posts>
> <http://fumento.com/emf.html>
>
> I recommend three (four) publications that cut through the mainstream
> alarmism to report actual facts: The Wall Street Journal (the op-eds,
> not the regular news reporting) Reason Magazine
> Forbes Magazine
> (and if you live in Canada, the National Post.)
>
> You have to read them ALL, and regularly, to catch all the facts as they
> appear, piecemeal.
>
> --
> Tegger- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Don't have to read a thing. Cell phones make me phisically ill..
That's all the info I need. I look at people who use them all the time
and wonder how they could possible do it... I'm way ahead of my time.
From: in2dadark on 5 Feb 2010 18:59
On Feb 5, 4:57 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> Mike Hunter wrote:
> > What's YOUR problem?   I have never had a problem with the insurance company
> > from whom I buy my healthcare, they do a great job and they offer me MORE
> > coverage than Medicare and for LESS money.
> > I'll bet you were never in the military if you believe the government can do
> > it "better."   LOL
>
> The VA actually does it well, with better care for less money.
>
> We spend more per capita on health care, yet we have a lot of people who
> don't have have care (I don't mean health insurance, I mean they can't
> get the kidney dialysis or diabetes care they need), shorter life
> expectancies and higher infant mortality than other developed countries.
>
> JEff
>
>
>
> > "dr_jeff" <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
> >news:39mdnUUss93f5_bWnZ2dnUVZ_rhi4p2d(a)giganews.com...
> >> Mike Hunter wrote:
> >>> No but BO does, and he wants to run our healthcare system   ;)
> >> Would you rather a bunch of money-grabbing insurance companies run the
> >> healthcare? I can't call it a system, because it is not a system.
>
> >> Jeff
>
> >>> "Tegger" <inva...(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message
> >>>news:Xns9D15BF70F18AFtegger(a)208.90.168.18...
> >>>> in2dadark <in2dad...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in
> >>>>news:05aef053-2e2c-4d81-a688-a31cb20a1a69(a)g29g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>>>>http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/residents-lawmakers-angry-as-health-o
> >>>>> fficials-give-up-211188.html
>
> >>>> Are you still on about that nonsense?
>
> >>>> That Alonso woman in your link faces far more danger to her health from
> >>>> her
> >>>> gross obesity than from any phantoms in the air.
>
> >>>> Who on earth would make an obese woman a director of health? Does she
> >>>> smoke, too?
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Tegger- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I have a hard time getting an apointment with the nurse who oversees
my HC at the VA. I don't even have a doc. This is good? I'm now
enlightened...
From: Jeff Strickland on 5 Feb 2010 19:19

"in2dadark" <in2dadark(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d51392ac-f1a8-4e4c-a094-68231969c28f(a)u41g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 5, 1:39 am, Tegger <inva...(a)invalid.inv> wrote:
> in2dadark <in2dad...(a)yahoo.com> wrote
> innews:1cbda79e-90ba-4eb1-a08c-1ca76340c9ab(a)j31g2000yqa.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 6:49 pm, Tegger <inva...(a)invalid.inv> wrote:
> >> in2dadark <in2dad...(a)yahoo.com> wrote
> >> innews:05aef053-2e2c-4d81-a688-a31c
> > b20a1...(a)g29g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> >http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/residents-lawmakers-angry-as-
>
> >> Are you still on about that nonsense?
>
> >> That Alonso woman in your link faces far more danger to her health
> >> from her gross obesity than from any phantoms in the air.
>
> >> Who on earth would make an obese woman a director of health? Does she
> >> smoke, too?
>
> >> --
> >> Tegger
>
> > We'll see if I'm right. There are more and more stories about these
> > things instead of less and less.
>
> That's because the alarmists/activists are tireless in their fanaticism.
> There are some subjects, health and environment among them, where
> factual information is almost completely drowned out by the activists.
>
> The EMF thing was discredited in the mid-'90s, and nothing's changed
> since then.
>
> > And less and less people challenge me when I say it not than before...
>
> Because it's a fading fad; EMF is old hat. The alarmists are on to other
> fears these days.
>
> But now that the Global Warming thing is proving to be the invented scam
> I said it was all along, EMF may make a comeback as the alarmists look
> for something else to scare the public with.
>
> In my area the primary impetus for the EMF scare is plain old NIMBY-ism.
> Towers are ugly. Nobody wants them near their houses because they look
> icky. So they dredge up the old EMF nonsense to justify why they don't
> want towers near where they can see them.
>
> We've also got a wacko who's raging against a new gas-fired "peaker
> plant" that's being proposed for my part of the province. He's ranting
> about some sort of cancer causing nano-particles that are supposedly
> produced by the burning of natural gas (which he's careful to refer to
> as "methane"). Except that just about every industrial furnace, and most
> urban and suburban house furnaces /already/ burn "methane". He's put ads
> in the paper, and sends letters to the editor. Nothing stops the wackos,
> not even facts.
>
> > Now you'll come back with a tin foil
> > hat comment? Please have something better..? Please..
>
> People are easy to scare when they know nothing about the subject.
> That's what the alarmists count on.
>
> Some time ago I posted two links refuting the claims of the
> alarmists/activists.
>
> Here they are again:
> <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1566444/posts>
> <http://fumento.com/emf.html>
>
> I recommend three (four) publications that cut through the mainstream
> alarmism to report actual facts: The Wall Street Journal (the op-eds,
> not the regular news reporting) Reason Magazine
> Forbes Magazine
> (and if you live in Canada, the National Post.)
>
> You have to read them ALL, and regularly, to catch all the facts as they
> appear, piecemeal.
>
> --
> Tegger- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Don't have to read a thing. Cell phones make me phisically ill..
That's all the info I need. I look at people who use them all the time
and wonder how they could possible do it... I'm way ahead of my time.


<JS>
When you are REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT to use a cellphone, get back to us.
Until then, we are big boys and girls, and we can make our own decisions
about the technology we elect to adopt.

You could be way ahead of your time, or you could just be out of time.

You are bombarded constantly by radio waves, they are everywhere. The radio
waves from your cellphone are inconsequential when one considers all of the
other waves that are bombarding you. Surely you understand that the radio
waves that hit your car's radio antenna don't only hit the antenna. Or, the
waves that go into your TV set don't only go into the TV, and so on. And
don't forget the EMF from the lights and wires in your office.

In a few billion years, they will discover that civilization was destroyed
by radiowaves. Oh well ...

</JS>






From: Mike Hunter on 5 Feb 2010 20:14
In the US who do you believe is EVER denied the kidney dialysis or diabetes
care they need?


"dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
news:DOSdnboK2sehCfHWnZ2dnUVZ_oNi4p2d(a)giganews.com...
> Mike Hunter wrote:
>> What's YOUR problem? I have never had a problem with the insurance
>> company from whom I buy my healthcare, they do a great job and they offer
>> me MORE coverage than Medicare and for LESS money.
>> I'll bet you were never in the military if you believe the government can
>> do it "better." LOL
>
> The VA actually does it well, with better care for less money.
>
> We spend more per capita on health care, yet we have a lot of people who
> don't have have care (I don't mean health insurance, I mean they can't get
> the kidney dialysis or diabetes care they need), shorter life expectancies
> and higher infant mortality than other developed countries.
>
> JEff
>
>> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
>> news:39mdnUUss93f5_bWnZ2dnUVZ_rhi4p2d(a)giganews.com...
>>> Mike Hunter wrote:
>>>> No but BO does, and he wants to run our healthcare system ;)
>>> Would you rather a bunch of money-grabbing insurance companies run the
>>> healthcare? I can't call it a system, because it is not a system.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>>> "Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns9D15BF70F18AFtegger(a)208.90.168.18...
>>>>> in2dadark <in2dadark(a)yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:05aef053-2e2c-4d81-a688-a31cb20a1a69(a)g29g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/residents-lawmakers-angry-as-health-o
>>>>>> fficials-give-up-211188.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you still on about that nonsense?
>>>>>
>>>>> That Alonso woman in your link faces far more danger to her health
>>>>> from her
>>>>> gross obesity than from any phantoms in the air.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who on earth would make an obese woman a director of health? Does she
>>>>> smoke, too?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tegger
>>>>>
>>


From: Tegger on 5 Feb 2010 21:21
in2dadark <in2dadark(a)yahoo.com> wrote in
news:d51392ac-f1a8-4e4c-a094-68231969c28f(a)u41g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:

> On Feb 5, 1:39�am, Tegger <inva...(a)invalid.inv> wrote:

>>
>> You have to read them ALL, and regularly, to catch all the facts as
>> they appear, piecemeal.
>>
>
> Don't have to read a thing. Cell phones make me phisically ill..
> That's all the info I need. I look at people who use them all the time
> and wonder how they could possible do it... I'm way ahead of my time.
>


Are you, really and truly, dead serious with that last reply?


--
Tegger

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: {BS} RETARD to be removed from all government documents
Next: cell phones while driving