From: ByTor on
In article <952a7885-61fe-43c7-ada1-139e47d58839
@g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 31, 12:16 pm, dr_jeff <u...(a)msu.edu> wrote:
> > Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> > > On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:09:41 -0400, dr_jeff wrote:
> >
> > >> What is the citation for the peer-reviewed article? I mean the actual
> > >> article.
> >
> > > They don't have one, Jeff. They're still stuck on Bush and Cheney.
> > > Their Wonder President is turning into a dud, so they still hang on to
> > > dreams of Bush.
> >
> > Regardless of whether or not Bush and Cheney should be prosecuted or
> > Obama is a dud, a testable claim was made: There was a peer-reviewed
> > article. I would like to read the article, but didn't find it.
> >
> > Besides, one's belief on how well Obama is doing has nothing to do with
> > whether or not there is a conspiracy around 9/11.
> >
> > Jeff
>
> Obama and his administration is what is standing in the way of even
> collecting data and evidence. He'll protect the Bush family and later
> Obama will be protected. Not a complex reason.

That is the most realistic, honest, & fair thing I have heard so far
ed......You hit the nail on the head, no matter what every
administration screws up & this administration has a lot off issues with
*freedoms* on their hands as well, just like Bush.