Prev: Toyota Camry -- Speedometer not working... Will it fail smog?
Next: Are you really happy with your penis size?!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 15 Nov 2009 12:14 On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:14:48 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> This crew in Washington right now is more concerened with the appearance >> of impropriety than anything else, and are kowtowing to lesser >> authorities because it's the Proper thing to do. >> >> They shouldn't be allowed to run Amtrak, let alone the United States of >> America. > > > You are jealous of Mr. Benjamin because of his legal skills which dwarf > any skill you now have, have ever had, or will ever have. So you called > him a silly name. I am not jealous of anyone who advocates Political Correctness over Common Sense. That has absolutely NOTHING to do with the discussion, as is your usual tactic when you have painted yourself into a corner. This bullshit is so flimsy even a half-wit like *YOU* could get them freed on a motion, even while drooling all over yourself. Both Obama and Holder should know this, and if they don't neither one of them should have ever been granted a Law degree.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 15 Nov 2009 18:00 "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message news:pan.2009.11.15.17.14.29.85759(a)e86.GTS... > On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:14:48 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >>> This crew in Washington right now is more concerened with the appearance >>> of impropriety than anything else, and are kowtowing to lesser >>> authorities because it's the Proper thing to do. >>> >>> They shouldn't be allowed to run Amtrak, let alone the United States of >>> America. >> >> >> You are jealous of Mr. Benjamin because of his legal skills which dwarf >> any skill you now have, have ever had, or will ever have. So you called >> him a silly name. > > I am not jealous of anyone who advocates Political Correctness over Common > Sense. Good, because he didn't do that. He presented statistics which indicate that trying terrorists in federal courts has been quite successful in the past. You did not read the article. I know this because the statistics were presented AFTER the first paragraph. I remember you saying that articles are generally too long for you to comprehend with your toddler-like attention span.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 15 Nov 2009 19:10 "Scott in Florida" <JustAskl(a)verizon.net> wrote in message news:0r31g5l80k8dmfmtqc2satbe8jhfkk5jva(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:00:04 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" > <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: > >>Good, because he didn't do that. He presented statistics which indicate >>that >>trying terrorists in federal courts has been quite successful in the past. > > Oh? > > Ever hear of 9/11??? > > > -- > > The Sot in Florida Go back to sleep, grandpa. Your train's off the tracks for at least the 1000th time this year.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 15 Nov 2009 21:43 "dbu`" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message news:hsGdnblWO7cfKZ3WnZ2dnUVZ_sxi4p2d(a)giganews.com... > In article <TL0Mm.34989$W77.30099(a)newsfe11.iad>, > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: > >> "Scott in Florida" <JustAskl(a)verizon.net> wrote in message >> news:0r31g5l80k8dmfmtqc2satbe8jhfkk5jva(a)4ax.com... >> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:00:04 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" >> > <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: >> > >> >>Good, because he didn't do that. He presented statistics which indicate >> >>that >> >>trying terrorists in federal courts has been quite successful in the >> >>past. >> > >> > Oh? >> > >> > Ever hear of 9/11??? >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > The Sot in Florida >> >> >> Go back to sleep, grandpa. Your train's off the tracks for at least the >> 1000th time this year. > > What, not gig tonight twit? > -- > What? You're too drunk to write (again)?
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 16 Nov 2009 07:59
"Scott in Florida" <MoveOn(a)outa.here> wrote in message news:e1j2g59igvcj14t911bpc8opdiorv57vi9(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:47:12 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom" > <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote: > >>> >>> Please, don't make any personal attacks about his "condition" or >>> anything >>> else. It hurts your argument more than helps it. And makes this an >>> unfriendly place. >>> >>> Jeff >> >> >>I was simply stating a fact. However, I should've used the plural: >>conditions. >> > > Back up your assertions. > > With facts..... Every time you post a message, you prove what I said: You're a senile old drunk. |