{BS} Not only closing Gitmo, trying confessed terrorists in Civil court.
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Toyota Camry -- Speedometer not working... Will it fail smog?
Next: Are you really happy with your penis size?!
From: Jeff Strickland on 13 Nov 2009 19:30 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message news:%4kLm.255$tz6.167(a)newsfe02.iad... > "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message > news:pan.2009.11.13.15.50.46.747384(a)e86.GTS... >> All in the name of Political Correctness. >> >> Can someone tell me what is wrong with Guantanamo Bay? I don't see it. >> Other than it's not 'Politically Correct', of course. >> >> Political Correctness is going to bring this country to it's knees, and >> some idiots are cheering. >> >> I need to leave. Can someone suggest a country where people really are >> free and are not guided by morons? >> >> > > I realize that your vast experience swapping motherboards has given you > legal insights which the world should be in awe of, but there are other > opinions which seem equally valuable. > The 9/11 attacks were an act of war declared upon us by foreign interests that are not represented by any state or country. The lack of governmental backing does not lessen the the magnitude of the attacks. It does present problems relative to the Geneva Conventions because the conventions were specifically crafted to deal with handling the soldiers of the states and countries that might go to war with one another. Radical Islam declared war, Holy War, on America soon after the Taliban ousted Russia from Afghanistan. Ironically, the Taliban likely would not have managed to push the Russians out if the West had not supported them. The Taliban IS radical Islam. Others are also radical Islam, but the 9/11 attacks grew out of Islamists more closely linked to the Taliban and al Qaeda than any of the other radicalized Islamists around the globe. But, you're an idiot that has had this explained to you so many times that the letters are wearing off of my keyboard. Bringing the Gitmo Five to trial in New York would be akin to bringing the Japanese Empire to trial in Hawaii for bombing Pearl Harbor. This is a wartime issue, not a criminal issue. There is no place in American jurisprudence to try these guys in criminal courts.
From: Jeff Strickland on 13 Nov 2009 19:33 "dbu`" <nospam(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message news:j-adnXgINYzrcmDXnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > In article <pan.2009.11.13.15.50.46.747384(a)e86.GTS>, > Hachiroku ÉnÉ`ÉçÉN <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> All in the name of Political Correctness. >> >> Can someone tell me what is wrong with Guantanamo Bay? I don't see it. >> Other than it's not 'Politically Correct', of course. >> >> Political Correctness is going to bring this country to it's knees, and >> some idiots are cheering. >> >> I need to leave. Can someone suggest a country where people really are >> free and are not guided by morons? > > The AG feels he has a case. It will be most interesting IF they are > found NG and set free. I hope for the best, that is, guilty for the > obama's sake. As much I don't care for his administration and policies, > but I do feel some empathy, at least for someone that is as disconnected > without even a small clue, as he is, (obama). The Gitmo Five will win on appeal. They won't have enough Muslims on the jury. Or, they will win outright -- the jury will be packed with radicalized Muslims.
From: Jeff Strickland on 13 Nov 2009 19:34 "Scott in Florida" <MoveOn(a)outa.here> wrote in message news:scurf555b4bsnj187v5dfotdj4j3iilc9q(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:50:46 -0500, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> > wrote: > >>All in the name of Political Correctness. >> >>Can someone tell me what is wrong with Guantanamo Bay? I don't see it. >>Other than it's not 'Politically Correct', of course. >> >>Political Correctness is going to bring this country to it's knees, and >>some idiots are cheering. >> >>I need to leave. Can someone suggest a country where people really are >>free and are not guided by morons? >> > > Australia will be my choice. > > It ain't perfect, but a country that starts planning the weekend on > Wednesday can't be all bad. > > They do drive on the wrong side of the road, though.... > I can get them to change that. Stopping at Red Lights is a practice that deserves a second look too.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 13 Nov 2009 15:54 On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:29:07 -0500, Scott in Florida wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:50:46 -0500, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >>All in the name of Political Correctness. >> >>Can someone tell me what is wrong with Guantanamo Bay? I don't see it. >>Other than it's not 'Politically Correct', of course. >> >>Political Correctness is going to bring this country to it's knees, and >>some idiots are cheering. >> >>I need to leave. Can someone suggest a country where people really are >>free and are not guided by morons? >> >> > Australia will be my choice. > > It ain't perfect, but a country that starts planning the weekend on > Wednesday can't be all bad. > > They do drive on the wrong side of the road, though.... They use the British standard there. If you don't like the PM, he can call a general election and you can correct a 'mistake'. Too bad we don't have that here... And, I could probably find a mint condition Hachiroku there, that hasn't been eaten away by rust. Or, a nice 1989 Nissan GT-R...WOOO!
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 13 Nov 2009 16:01
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:44:53 -0600, dbu` wrote: > In article <pan.2009.11.13.15.50.46.747384(a)e86.GTS>, > Hachiroku ÃnÃ`ÃçÃN <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote: > >> All in the name of Political Correctness. >> >> Can someone tell me what is wrong with Guantanamo Bay? I don't see it. >> Other than it's not 'Politically Correct', of course. >> >> Political Correctness is going to bring this country to it's knees, and >> some idiots are cheering. >> >> I need to leave. Can someone suggest a country where people really are >> free and are not guided by morons? > > The AG feels he has a case. It will be most interesting IF they are found > NG and set free. I hope for the best, that is, guilty for the obama's > sake. As much I don't care for his administration and policies, but I do > feel some empathy, at least for someone that is as disconnected without > even a small clue, as he is, (obama). As I said, this is all for Political Correctness. There are a few things that come into play in a Civilian court that wouldn't in a Military Tribunal. First of all, they are saying 'they will have all the rights afforded to anyone tried in a US court". Oh, really?!?!?! Well, have they ever been Mirandized? NO?!?!?! Well, then, their rights have been abused! No case. Thrown out on a technicality. I'm sure there are HUNDREDS of 'technicalities' that will pop up in this 'trial'. Here's another one: "Your honor, my clients cannot get a fair trial here, a block away from the site of the WTC. I am asking for a change of venue, and suggest this trial be heard in the 7th District court." (For those that don't know, the 7th Federal District is...San Francisco... Or, is that the 9th? If you really care, google it... These people are buffoons. This is a case of terrorism against the US by enemy combatants, and should be tried as such. Political Correctness bullshit. |