Prev: Sorry Flash� but I can't be bothered . . .
Next: Plans to Evacuate Tampa Bay
From: edspyhill01 on 30 Jun 2010 23:03
On Jun 30, 9:12 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> "dbu'" <nos...(a)nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>
> news:4LCdnbHzX4ykdrbRnZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <77b6abdb-2e57-407f-94c3-ed9b8f37b...(a)i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
> > n...(a)wt.net wrote:
>
> >> On Jun 29, 5:42 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> >> > According to her testimony today, she doesn't really stand on much of
> >> > anything.
>
> >> All she is doing is saying what she thinks everyone wants to hear.
> >> She is posing as a centrist, middle of the roader, whatever.
> >> But in reality, she will be a far left Obama clone on the court.
> >> She is a total sham, and yes, it's an ugly dog and pony show.
> >> I have no use for her just for her attitudes on the 2nd amendment.
> >> If she had her way, which will mirror the thoughts of the gifted one,
> >> 2A would go away never to be heard from again.
> >> She was one of Clintons flunkies the last time they tried to
> >> make a 2A grab. And we all know where that got him.. :/
>
> > It's a dog and pony show, she's the dog.
>
> Isn't she the north end of a southbound pony?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

But you look like a shar pei and smell like a wet mutt.
From: ron on 30 Jun 2010 23:30
I keep forgetting which of these two or was it both that were dating Hillary
when she met Bill?

Joe asked a question about SCOTUS decisions affecting us. Well somewhere
along the way they allowed the income tax to become law. That affects the
roughly half of us that pay to keep the government running.



From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 30 Jun 2010 23:45
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:01:42 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

>>> Name three Supreme Court decisions which have had a material effect on
>>> you.
>>
>> The ones who stood up for Roe v. Wade.
>
>
> That had no material effect on you.

Wanna bet?


From: JoeSpareBedroom on 1 Jul 2010 00:07
"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:4c2c0f59$0$1045$afc38c87(a)read01.usenet4all.se...
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:01:42 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>>>> Name three Supreme Court decisions which have had a material effect on
>>>> you.
>>>
>>> The ones who stood up for Roe v. Wade.
>>
>>
>> That had no material effect on you.
>
> Wanna bet?
>
>


Name three Supreme Court decisions which have had a material effect on you.


From: nm5k on 1 Jul 2010 00:07
On Jun 30, 7:54 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> Except tht the 2nd was reaffirmed just yesterday. It was a 5-4 vote, Stevens
> being one of the 4, and Kagan will simply be another Stevens.
>
> The language that the court used to affirm the 2nd dates back to post-Civil
> War era when it was attempted to keep blacks from owning guns, and the court
> said that if a black can't protect his family in his home, then who can?
>
> I think the anti-gun crowd was dealt a crushing defeat for the next many
> yers.

You would hope so, but I'm not so optimistic there won't be later
attempts
at more gun control laws. Also, I find the narrow margin in the court
as disturbing. If they are all following the constitution, the vote
should
have been unanimous. :/
I already see the mayor of Chicago wants to add a zillion regulations
and restrictions to any gun owners.. IE: only one pistol, insurance,
etc..
If it were up to Obama or even Kagen, we wouldn't have even that.
I feel fairly certain he thought he was going to try to add more gun
control laws when he first ran and was elected. But I think the mass
buying of weapons and being voted "gun salesman of the year" for 2009
caught him by surprise and he saw the light..
At least for this term.. Hopefully, there will be only one term.

>
> Cities and States have a reasonable (in my opinion) need to prevent violent
> ex-felons from being able to own guns, and such legislation would have to
> define very narrowly those that are not allowed.

And of course, it's already illegal for any felon to own firearms.

>
> I think we need faster prosecution of gun crimes, and I favor the Death
> Penalty for gun crime perps.

I don't think they should be dealt with any faster than any other
violent
crime.
If one is fatally stabbed with a knife, they are still just as dead as
if
one used a Model 29 Dirty Harry special instead.




First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Sorry Flash� but I can't be bothered . . .
Next: Plans to Evacuate Tampa Bay