Prev: 1997 Toyota Corolla Blower Noisy and only high speed
Next: SECOND GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD . . .
From: larry moe 'n curly on 26 Jan 2010 14:42


Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>
> give you a friggin' headache?
>
> She went on for 10 minutes about how terrible it is now that the SJC has
> shot down campaign funding laws, and how "Big Media" will now dictate who
> will get elected by following the money.
>
> But she did not say a single WORD about how General Electr...er, I mean
> NBC ran FREE publicity, disguised as "News" programs for Obama...the Today
> show, Meet the Press (to bad Tim Russert deid before the election...he
> wouldn't have given Obama all the blow jobs on the air that Brokaw did)
> and certain GE big wigs were given political appointments and advisory
> positions.

You're probably one of those idiot conspiracists who thinks GE/NBC has
been pro-Obama, but this is the same company who's chairman in 2000
pushed NBC News to declare GW Bush the winner of the Florida election,
and it's given plenty of coverage to John McCain, who continues to be
one of the most frequent guests on its Meet The Press programs.

> She's no better than Rush Limbaugh. He can give me headaches at times, but
> at least he's not a L00N...

Randi Rhodes is a lot better than Limbaugh. For one thing, she isn't
a shill for any political party, as Limbaugh is for the Republican
party that he leads, and it's not rare for her to criticize Democrats,
even on some of their mainstream positions. Then there's the matter
of Rhodes presenting her opinions coherently and in a manner
consistent with facts from nonpartisan sources, something Limbaugh
avoids regularly.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 26 Jan 2010 13:50
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:42:12 -0800, larry moe 'n curly wrote:

>
>
> Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>>
>> give you a friggin' headache?
>>
>> She went on for 10 minutes about how terrible it is now that the SJC has
>> shot down campaign funding laws, and how "Big Media" will now dictate
>> who will get elected by following the money.
>>
>> But she did not say a single WORD about how General Electr...er, I mean
>> NBC ran FREE publicity, disguised as "News" programs for Obama...the
>> Today show, Meet the Press (to bad Tim Russert deid before the
>> election...he wouldn't have given Obama all the blow jobs on the air
>> that Brokaw did) and certain GE big wigs were given political
>> appointments and advisory positions.
>
> You're probably one of those idiot conspiracists who thinks GE/NBC has
> been pro-Obama,

No, I don't think they're pro Obama; they have him on one 'news' program
or another at LEAST once a month, and Merideth Viera might just as well
wear an Obama cheerleader outfit, as well as a few others.


> but this is the same company who's chairman in 2000 pushed
> NBC News to declare GW Bush the winner of the Florida election, and it's
> given plenty of coverage to John McCain, who continues to be one of the
> most frequent guests on its Meet The Press programs.

I think they kinda have to or get fined by the FCC.
Who better to have than the opponent to the person you helped get elected.

I guess you aren't much of a viewer of NBC; either that or your rose
coloured glasses keep you from seeing the truth.


>
>> She's no better than Rush Limbaugh. He can give me headaches at times,
>> but at least he's not a L00N...
>
> Randi Rhodes is a lot better than Limbaugh.

She's a friggin' nut. She's worse than Limbaugh from my point of view, and
at least as bad for the way she selectively spews out what SHE thinks is
important and never mind the rest, it's not important. When it comes to
completely presenting an issue, she ranks right next to Fox, maybe a
little higher.

> For one thing, she isn't a
> shill for any political party, as Limbaugh is for the Republican party
> that he leads, and it's not rare for her to criticize Democrats, even on
> some of their mainstream positions. Then there's the matter of Rhodes
> presenting her opinions coherently and in a manner consistent with facts
> from nonpartisan sources, something Limbaugh avoids regularly.


Like I said, I rankr her right up there with Fox News on this.

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 26 Jan 2010 13:50
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:32:52 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote:

> On Jan 25, 4:48 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:14:31 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote:
>> > On Jan 25, 5:19 pm, "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote:
>> >> Personal opinions aside the Supreme Court has finally ruled,
>> >> political speech is primarily the TYPE of speech that the
>> >> Constitution intended to protect, for the people, in our
>> >> Representative type of government.
>>
>> > Individuals have free speech. When individuals form a collective they
>> > still have free speech. The collective has free speech through the
>> > individual members.
>>
>> > I think you guys are stupid and a waste of time. It's like arguing
>> > with a bunch of "rainmen".
>>
>> Well. I could say the very same thing about you.
>>
>> Did you get the point of my original post?
>>
>> Think about it: the mainstream media had nothing but *good* to say about
>> Obama, and nothing but negatives about McCain and Palin.
>>
>> Imagine that, an image made, and not paid a penny for!
>>
>> Well, except for political favors and appointments, of course.
>>
>> Or, did all of that go completely over your head, since it was served up
>> with K00L-Aid?
>>
>> So that's OK, but paying is not?
>
> Again, you are all over the place with disjointed points.


Um, yeah. Ok...

You miss Joe so much you're trying to take his place?


First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: 1997 Toyota Corolla Blower Noisy and only high speed
Next: SECOND GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD . . .