Prev: 1997 Toyota Corolla Blower Noisy and only high speed
Next: SECOND GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD . . .
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 25 Jan 2010 16:25
give you a friggin' headache?

She went on for 10 minutes about how terrible it is now that the SJC has
shot down campaign funding laws, and how "Big Media" will now dictate who
will get elected by following the money.

But she did not say a single WORD about how General Electr...er, I mean
NBC ran FREE publicity, disguised as "News" programs for Obama...the Today
show, Meet the Press (to bad Tim Russert deid before the election...he
wouldn't have given Obama all the blow jobs on the air that Brokaw did)
and certain GE big wigs were given political appointments and advisory
positions.

She's no better than Rush Limbaugh. He can give me headaches at times, but
at least he's not a L00N...


From: Mike Hunter on 25 Jan 2010 17:19
Personal opinions aside the Supreme Court has finally ruled, political
speech is primarily the TYPE of speech that the Constitution intended to
protect, for the people, in our Representative type of government.


"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2010.01.25.21.25.52.530618(a)e86.GTS...
> give you a friggin' headache?
>
> She went on for 10 minutes about how terrible it is now that the SJC has
> shot down campaign funding laws, and how "Big Media" will now dictate who
> will get elected by following the money.
>
> But she did not say a single WORD about how General Electr...er, I mean
> NBC ran FREE publicity, disguised as "News" programs for Obama...the Today
> show, Meet the Press (to bad Tim Russert deid before the election...he
> wouldn't have given Obama all the blow jobs on the air that Brokaw did)
> and certain GE big wigs were given political appointments and advisory
> positions.
>
> She's no better than Rush Limbaugh. He can give me headaches at times, but
> at least he's not a L00N...
>
>


From: edspyhill01 on 25 Jan 2010 21:14
On Jan 25, 5:19 pm, "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote:
> Personal opinions aside the Supreme Court has finally ruled, political
> speech is primarily the TYPE of speech that the Constitution intended to
> protect, for the people, in our Representative type of government.
>

Individuals have free speech. When individuals form a collective they
still have free speech. The collective has free speech through the
individual members.

I think you guys are stupid and a waste of time. It's like arguing
with a bunch of "rainmen".

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 25 Jan 2010 16:48
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:14:31 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote:

> On Jan 25, 5:19 pm, "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote:
>> Personal opinions aside the Supreme Court has finally ruled, political
>> speech is primarily the TYPE of speech that the Constitution intended to
>> protect, for the people, in our Representative type of government.
>>
>>
> Individuals have free speech. When individuals form a collective they
> still have free speech. The collective has free speech through the
> individual members.
>
> I think you guys are stupid and a waste of time. It's like arguing with a
> bunch of "rainmen".


Well. I could say the very same thing about you.

Did you get the point of my original post?

Think about it: the mainstream media had nothing but *good* to say about
Obama, and nothing but negatives about McCain and Palin.

Imagine that, an image made, and not paid a penny for!

Well, except for political favors and appointments, of course.

Or, did all of that go completely over your head, since it was served up
with K00L-Aid?

So that's OK, but paying is not?

From: edspyhill01 on 26 Jan 2010 06:32
On Jan 25, 4:48 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:14:31 -0800, edspyhill01 wrote:
> > On Jan 25, 5:19 pm, "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2(a)lycos,com> wrote:
> >> Personal opinions aside the Supreme Court has finally ruled, political
> >> speech is primarily the TYPE of speech that the Constitution intended to
> >> protect, for the people, in our Representative type of government.
>
> > Individuals have free speech. When individuals form a collective they
> > still have free speech. The collective has free speech through the
> > individual members.
>
> > I think you guys are stupid and a waste of time. It's like arguing with a
> > bunch of "rainmen".
>
> Well. I could say the very same thing about you.
>
> Did you get the point of my original post?
>
> Think about it: the mainstream media had nothing but *good* to say about
> Obama, and nothing but negatives about McCain and Palin.
>
> Imagine that, an image made, and not paid a penny for!
>
> Well, except for political favors and appointments, of course.
>
> Or, did all of that go completely over your head, since it was served up
> with K00L-Aid?
>
> So that's OK, but paying is not?

Again, you are all over the place with disjointed points.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: 1997 Toyota Corolla Blower Noisy and only high speed
Next: SECOND GREATEST STORY EVER TOLD . . .