Prev: {BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox
Next: {BS} Latest Internet slander about Glenn Beck
From: ByTor on 14 Sep 2009 09:16
In article <48ab8ce6-a97d-40aa-8adf-30247f90e724
@l35g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, larrymoencurly(a)my-deja.com says...
>
> ByTor wrote:
> > In article <9887e69d-a41e-40d8-98c5-366b1ab56f31
> > @b18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, matrixxx09(a)gmail.com says...
> > >
> > > On Sep 12, 6:52 pm, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <83ff7770-4b97-45c3-9d44-
> > > > ecaa28fb0...(a)r33g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, matrixx...(a)gmail.com says...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Sep 12, 6:46 pm, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article <17e962a5-b15b-4353-8851-
> > > > > > 200c785ce...(a)s15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, matrixx...(a)gmail.com says...
> > > >
> > > > > > > Does Fox grow these blondes in a lab or something?
> > > >
> > > > > > At least fox has the best looking woman......Would you rather look
> > > > > > at Rachel Maddow?
> > > >
> > > > > Let me stop you there.  I wasn't criticizing or complaining, so
> > > > > there's no need for an "at least Fox..".
> > > >
> > > > And I wasn't defending either, so let me stop you there.
> > >
> > > FYI when you start off by saying "At least..." it suggests that the
> > > other person had said something negative about the thing you're
> > > addressing.
> > >
> > > This makes sense:
> > >
> > > "There is something about X that I don't like." Reply: "At least
> > > X..."
> > >
> > > This doesn't:
> > >
> > > "There is something about X that I really like." Reply: "At least
> > > X..."
> > >
> > > Just for future reference. Hope this helps.
> >
> > Thanks for the grammer lesson.
>
> grammar
>
> I wish TV news outlets would stop being hypcrites by portraying their
> anchors as real journalists, because lots of them were beauty
> contestants, models, or actresses who have no journalistic talent at
> all. That's why the integrity of BBC and Naked News should be
> praised.

Forget the media & what defines "real" journalism, I wish people would
use their votes wisely in what qualifies an individual to run for
congress, and not vote based on sound bytes & what's the "in" thing to
do instead of actually researching.

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 14 Sep 2009 16:48
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:54:19 -0700, larry moe 'n curly wrote:

>> Thanks for the grammer lesson.
>
> grammar
>
> I wish TV news outlets would stop being hypcrites by portraying their
> anchors as real journalists, because lots of them were beauty contestants,
> models, or actresses who have no journalistic talent at all. That's why
> the integrity of BBC and Naked News should be praised.

ARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!

Yeah. Well, the BBC has dropped out of the running there. Even 5 years ago
you could have said this, but now some of their 'reporters' are just that.
They read what their told.

Ask their 'science' editor, who has already conclusively decided that
'Climate Change' is manmade, even though no other scientist has yet come
to this conclusion.

Nope! No agendas at the BBC!

(Um, they even released a statement a few years ago *admitting* they had
agendas.)



First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: {BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox
Next: {BS} Latest Internet slander about Glenn Beck