{BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox
in [Toyota]
|
From: edspyhill01 on 12 Sep 2009 22:15 On Sep 12, 6:59 pm, matrixxx09 <matrixx...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 12, 6:52 pm, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > > > > > > In article <83ff7770-4b97-45c3-9d44- > > ecaa28fb0...(a)r33g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, matrixx...(a)gmail.com says.... > > > > On Sep 12, 6:46 pm, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > > > In article <17e962a5-b15b-4353-8851- > > > > 200c785ce...(a)s15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, matrixx...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > Does Fox grow these blondes in a lab or something? > > > > > At least fox has the best looking woman......Would you rather look > > > > at Rachel Maddow? > > > > Let me stop you there. I wasn't criticizing or complaining, so > > > there's no need for an "at least Fox..". > > > And I wasn't defending either, so let me stop you there. > > FYI when you start off by saying "At least..." it suggests that the > other person had said something negative about the thing you're > addressing. > > This makes sense: > > "There is something about X that I don't like." Reply: "At least > X..." > > This doesn't: > > "There is something about X that I really like." Reply: "At least > X..." > > Just for future reference. Hope this helps.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You are talking to low IQ people.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 12 Sep 2009 23:41 On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:15:08 -0700, edspyhill01 wrote: >> "There is something about X that I really like." Reply: "At least >> X..." >> >> Just for future reference. Hope this helps.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > You are talking to low IQ people. And, uh, who is the resident tin-foil hat model here?
From: ByTor on 13 Sep 2009 10:16 In article <28d6cf87-3e07-4e71-ac05-99e53c591ec2 @j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com says... > > On Sep 12, 6:59 pm, matrixxx09 <matrixx...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 12, 6:52 pm, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article <83ff7770-4b97-45c3-9d44- > > > ecaa28fb0...(a)r33g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, matrixx...(a)gmail.com says.... > > > > > > On Sep 12, 6:46 pm, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <17e962a5-b15b-4353-8851- > > > > > 200c785ce...(a)s15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, matrixx...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > > Does Fox grow these blondes in a lab or something? > > > > > > > At least fox has the best looking woman......Would you rather look > > > > > at Rachel Maddow? > > > > > > Let me stop you there. I wasn't criticizing or complaining, so > > > > there's no need for an "at least Fox..". > > > > > And I wasn't defending either, so let me stop you there. > > > > FYI when you start off by saying "At least..." it suggests that the > > other person had said something negative about the thing you're > > addressing. > > > > This makes sense: > > > > "There is something about X that I don't like." Reply: "At least > > X..." > > > > This doesn't: > > > > "There is something about X that I really like." Reply: "At least > > X..." > > > > Just for future reference. Hope this helps.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > You are talking to low IQ people. Why's that, because they oppose your opinions?
From: larry moe 'n curly on 14 Sep 2009 02:54 ByTor wrote: > In article <9887e69d-a41e-40d8-98c5-366b1ab56f31 > @b18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, matrixxx09(a)gmail.com says... > > > > On Sep 12, 6:52 pm, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > > In article <83ff7770-4b97-45c3-9d44- > > > ecaa28fb0...(a)r33g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, matrixx...(a)gmail.com says.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 6:46 pm, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > > > > In article <17e962a5-b15b-4353-8851- > > > > > 200c785ce...(a)s15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, matrixx...(a)gmail.com says... > > > > > > > > > Does Fox grow these blondes in a lab or something? > > > > > > > > At least fox has the best looking woman......Would you rather look > > > > > at Rachel Maddow? > > > > > > > Let me stop you there. I wasn't criticizing or complaining, so > > > > there's no need for an "at least Fox..". > > > > > > And I wasn't defending either, so let me stop you there. > > > > FYI when you start off by saying "At least..." it suggests that the > > other person had said something negative about the thing you're > > addressing. > > > > This makes sense: > > > > "There is something about X that I don't like." Reply: "At least > > X..." > > > > This doesn't: > > > > "There is something about X that I really like." Reply: "At least > > X..." > > > > Just for future reference. Hope this helps. > > Thanks for the grammer lesson. grammar I wish TV news outlets would stop being hypcrites by portraying their anchors as real journalists, because lots of them were beauty contestants, models, or actresses who have no journalistic talent at all. That's why the integrity of BBC and Naked News should be praised.
From: larry moe 'n curly on 14 Sep 2009 04:14 Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote: > > She always made it known, at least three times a day on her radio program > out here that she preferred women. At least three times. Is that why you've always listened to Rachel Maddow? You've established, beyond all doubt, either that you have done so or that you're so wierd that you pay attention to somebody else who keeps count of her mentions.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: {BS} Hachi, see the fox on Fox Next: {BS} Latest Internet slander about Glenn Beck |