From: Cliff on 24 Jun 2010 05:15 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/22/AR2010062204540.html "Sarah Palin's fence didn't have to be so ugly" I'm glad she has nothing to do with reality. -- Cliff
From: Liberal Leroy on 25 Jun 2010 22:08 "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message news:c08626pkr0t1df4dl7j2ir1eq56pk2o9vi(a)4ax.com... > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/22/AR2010062204540.html > "Sarah Palin's fence didn't have to be so ugly" > > > I'm glad she has nothing to do with reality. > -- > Cliff Aw, I'll bet it doesn't look so ugly when viewed from the other side :)
From: Cliff on 26 Jun 2010 05:13 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:08:11 -0500, "Liberal Leroy" <leroy(a)libland.lib> wrote: > > >"Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >news:c08626pkr0t1df4dl7j2ir1eq56pk2o9vi(a)4ax.com... >> >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/22/AR2010062204540.html >> "Sarah Palin's fence didn't have to be so ugly" >> >> >> I'm glad she has nothing to do with reality. >> -- >> Cliff > >Aw, I'll bet it doesn't look so ugly when viewed from the other side :) At least it blocks out the light of day, right? -- Cliff
From: Liberal Leroy on 26 Jun 2010 09:32 "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message news:f4hb269m1abdes13fp2p2lamifdtev57ug(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:08:11 -0500, "Liberal Leroy" <leroy(a)libland.lib> > wrote: > >> >> >>"Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>news:c08626pkr0t1df4dl7j2ir1eq56pk2o9vi(a)4ax.com... >>> >>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/22/AR2010062204540.html >>> "Sarah Palin's fence didn't have to be so ugly" >>> >>> >>> I'm glad she has nothing to do with reality. >>> -- >>> Cliff >> >>Aw, I'll bet it doesn't look so ugly when viewed from the other side :) > > At least it blocks out the light of day, right? > -- > Cliff Wrong. From the picture it looks pretty light over there. And there's no sign of Mexicans in the picture either, so it's a better fence than Obama could ever build.
From: Cliff on 27 Jun 2010 09:45 On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:32:10 -0500, "Liberal Leroy" <leroy(a)libland.lib> wrote: > > >"Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >news:f4hb269m1abdes13fp2p2lamifdtev57ug(a)4ax.com... >> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:08:11 -0500, "Liberal Leroy" <leroy(a)libland.lib> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>"Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>>news:c08626pkr0t1df4dl7j2ir1eq56pk2o9vi(a)4ax.com... >>>> >>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/22/AR2010062204540.html >>>> "Sarah Palin's fence didn't have to be so ugly" >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm glad she has nothing to do with reality. >>>> -- >>>> Cliff >>> >>>Aw, I'll bet it doesn't look so ugly when viewed from the other side :) >> >> At least it blocks out the light of day, right? >> -- >> Cliff > >Wrong. From the picture it looks pretty light over there. And there's no >sign of Mexicans in the picture either, so it's a better fence than Obama >could ever build. It clearly keeps the light of truth out. But it was probably afraid in the first place. -- Cliff
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: U.S. scores dead last again in healthcare study Next: Are we really superior to the Muslims? |