meow
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Receiver for the car?
Next: Camry EGR Valve, Code P0401
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 29 Mar 2010 22:56 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:12:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:45:36 -0400, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got > double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:10:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>>>> "YOU DON'T MEAN ANYTHING IN MY WORLD!!!!" >>>> >>>>First correct thing you've said. >>>> >>>> >>> And yet you cannot stop can you. Every person that responds forces you >>> to respond. So the more people in the thread the harder it becomes for >>> you to fight your obsession. >>> >>> Se your whining about the crossposts. You can't handle it can you. >> >>Right over your head. Don't get it yet, do you? >> >> > Well, here is your big chance, explain what I "didn't get". Go ahead, take > all the room you need to explain how my sarcasitic comment was completely > accurate and I didn't understand what you meant. > > That shouldn't be a problem for you, right. You can detail the thinking > that went into the sarcasm and how the underlying truth was there for you > to recognize. Here: >>> And yet you cannot stop can you. Every person that responds forces you >>> to respond. So the more people in the thread the harder it becomes for >>> you to fight your obsession. Now, got a mirror handy?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 29 Mar 2010 22:57 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:18:23 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:46:14 -0400, in the land of > alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got > double secret probation for writing: > >>On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:03:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:47:11 -0400, in the land of >>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>> got double secret probation for writing: >>> >>>>On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:30:57 +0000, Veronica Karlsson wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >> Ah, kook behavior spotted. Ordering others around. Yep. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > *moves =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= from >>>>>> > troll category to kook category* >>>>>> >>>>>> (considering the source...) >>>>> >>>>> I know some trolls who keep begging to be classified as kooks. >>>> >>>>There's a difference between a troll and a k00k. A troll does it for >>>>fun. Others take themselves seriously. >>>> >>>> >>> So you're a kook. >> >>I kinda had it the other way around. >> >> > Oh, that explains the whining. <-- SARCASM > > (I will be adding notation like above to help your comprehension) Um, got that mirror handy still?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 29 Mar 2010 22:58 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:58:53 +0900, The 2-Belo wrote: >>>>There's a difference between a troll and a k00k. A troll does it for >>>>fun. Others take themselves seriously. >>>> >>>> >>> So you're a kook. >> >>I kinda had it the other way around. > > Sounds like the usual M.O. I know. It's called "projection". Aratzio uses it altogether too much. They have drugs for that.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 29 Mar 2010 22:59 On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 06:54:25 +0000, Veronica Karlsson wrote: > =?iso-2022-jp?q?Hachiroku_=1B$B%O%A%m%=2F=1B=28B?= wrote: >> >> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:36:54 +0000, Veronica Karlsson wrote: >> >> >> > I know some trolls who keep begging to be classified as kooks. >> >> >> >> There's a difference between a troll and a k00k. A troll does it for >> >> fun. Others take themselves seriously. >> > >> > I meant it literally. >> >> Uh-huh... > > Yes. Literally. And, who's the one posting from a group called alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk...?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 29 Mar 2010 23:01
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:37:23 +0000, Veronica Karlsson wrote: >> LOL! Good God, NO! I can function at a cognizent level! > > Hmmm...? > > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cognizent > > "cognizent - no dictionary results" > > Hmmm...?? > > *tries "cognizant" as the dictionary suggests* > > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cognizant > > "having cognizance; aware (usually fol. by of): He was cognizant of the > difficulty." > > "Synonyms 1. See conscious." Great. You can use a dictionary. A simple spelling error should not have impeded your getting the point, but I guess not, eh? |