lock step
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 11 Jul 2010 17:19 On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:18:37 -0500, Gray Ghost wrote: > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in news:BMPZn.18002$f_ > 3.15555(a)newsfe17.iad: > >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:i189tn$cka$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>> news:7f2f36p72p7utppcuk4bamv15ln19q10vc(a)4ax.com... >>>> [ >>>> Republicans voted lock step against funding the war they themselves >>>> had touted all along, because it did anything else but burn war money. >>>> ] >>> >>> Citation. >> >> >> Do you simply want proof of how the vote went? >> >> Or: >> >> Do you want proof of what came after the word "because" in Cliff's >> statement? >> >> >> > Geez you are thick. In case you haven't noticed bills these days are > thicker than the bible and contain all sorts of legislation, much of which > has nothing to do with the name on the bill. SHHH! Ignorance is bliss! > > Are you misinformed or simply part of the problem? Yeah.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Jul 2010 21:21 "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns9DB2A5EB93240Wereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in news:BMPZn.18002$f_ > 3.15555(a)newsfe17.iad: > >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:i189tn$cka$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>> news:7f2f36p72p7utppcuk4bamv15ln19q10vc(a)4ax.com... >>>> [ >>>> Republicans voted lock step against funding the war they themselves >>>> had touted all along, because it did anything else but burn war >>>> money. >>>> ] >>> >>> Citation. >> >> >> Do you simply want proof of how the vote went? >> >> Or: >> >> Do you want proof of what came after the word "because" in Cliff's >> statement? >> >> > > Geez you are thick. In case you haven't noticed bills these days are > thicker > than the bible and contain all sorts of legislation, much of which has > nothing > to do with the name on the bill. > > Are you misinformed or simply part of the problem? Your comments are completely unrelated to the questions I directed at Strickland. Thanks for trying, though.
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Jul 2010 21:23 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:i1csrd$t05$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in message > news:BMPZn.18002$f_3.15555(a)newsfe17.iad... >> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:i189tn$cka$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>> news:7f2f36p72p7utppcuk4bamv15ln19q10vc(a)4ax.com... >>>> [ >>>> Republicans voted lock step against funding the war they themselves >>>> had touted all along, because it did anything else but burn war >>>> money. >>>> ] >>> >>> Citation. >> >> >> Do you simply want proof of how the vote went? >> >> Or: >> >> Do you want proof of what came after the word "because" in Cliff's >> statement? >> > > I'll accept the outcome of the vote, I want the legislation that was voted > on. So, you weren't able to go to google and type in the words "republicans war funding afghanistan 2010". That's interesting.
From: Gray Ghost on 11 Jul 2010 22:33 "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in news:G6u_n.7697$cO.5893 @newsfe09.iad: > "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9DB2A5EB93240Wereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in news:BMPZn.18002$f_ >> 3.15555(a)newsfe17.iad: >> >>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:i189tn$cka$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> >>>> "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>>> news:7f2f36p72p7utppcuk4bamv15ln19q10vc(a)4ax.com... >>>>> [ >>>>> Republicans voted lock step against funding the war they themselves >>>>> had touted all along, because it did anything else but burn war money. >>>>> ] >>>> >>>> Citation. >>> >>> >>> Do you simply want proof of how the vote went? >>> >>> Or: >>> >>> Do you want proof of what came after the word "because" in Cliff's >>> statement? >>> >>> >> >> Geez you are thick. In case you haven't noticed bills these days are >> thicker than the bible and contain all sorts of legislation, much of which >> has nothing to do with the name on the bill. >> >> Are you misinformed or simply part of the problem? > > > Your comments are completely unrelated to the questions I directed at > Strickland. Thanks for trying, though. > > > Actually they very directly answered his questions. Cliff is casting aspersions on the Republicans for against a bill for which very little information was given. And as a matter of principle i would vote against any bill that had unrelated items in it, no matter what sweet sounding title the decievers plastered on it. -- "Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties which may make anything mean everything or nothing at pleasure." �Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 1823
From: JoeSpareBedroom on 11 Jul 2010 23:00 "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns9DB2E5713F8B4Wereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... > "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in > news:G6u_n.7697$cO.5893 > @newsfe09.iad: > >> "Gray Ghost" <grey_ghost471-newsgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns9DB2A5EB93240Wereofftoseethewizrd(a)216.196.97.142... >>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash(a)frontiernet.net> wrote in >>> news:BMPZn.18002$f_ >>> 3.15555(a)newsfe17.iad: >>> >>>> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:i189tn$cka$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> >>>>> "Cliff" <Clhuprichguesswhat(a)aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message >>>>> news:7f2f36p72p7utppcuk4bamv15ln19q10vc(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> [ >>>>>> Republicans voted lock step against funding the war they themselves >>>>>> had touted all along, because it did anything else but burn war >>>>>> money. >>>>>> ] >>>>> >>>>> Citation. >>>> >>>> >>>> Do you simply want proof of how the vote went? >>>> >>>> Or: >>>> >>>> Do you want proof of what came after the word "because" in Cliff's >>>> statement? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Geez you are thick. In case you haven't noticed bills these days are >>> thicker than the bible and contain all sorts of legislation, much of >>> which >>> has nothing to do with the name on the bill. >>> >>> Are you misinformed or simply part of the problem? >> >> >> Your comments are completely unrelated to the questions I directed at >> Strickland. Thanks for trying, though. >> >> >> > > Actually they very directly answered his questions. Cliff is casting > aspersions on the Republicans for against a bill for which very little > information was given. And as a matter of principle i would vote against > any > bill that had unrelated items in it, no matter what sweet sounding title > the > decievers plastered on it. Strickland said he only wanted information about how the vote went. That does not involve opinions. It involves numbers. Some people voted yes, some people voted no. The information is easily available from reliable sources which are beyond reproach.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Palin mostly illiterate ? Next: Toyota to recall 600,000 1998-2010 Sienna minivans |