facebook is really dumb
in [Toyota]
|
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Apr 2010 22:57 On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:31:57 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>This counterindication seems to fit you to a "T": >> >>Central symptoms may include memory >>loss, disorientation, incoherence, hallucinations, psychosis, delirium, >>hyperactivity, twitching or jerking movements, stereotypy, and seizures. >> >> >>Caught again. Now YOU backpedal out of it. >> >> > don't have to, you ran like a scalded chicken when I told you. Gee, I guess you can't read very well. See above where it says "memory loss" I guess you forgot that. Remember when I said it occurs in high dosages? I guess you forgot that. Either you're on high therapeutic doses, or you're hitting the crack pipe while posting again. Either way, you can't read what's presented to you.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Apr 2010 22:58 On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:38:34 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>You certainly don't, that's for sure. > > Side effects may include: > Abnormal secretion of milk Is that how it affects you?
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Apr 2010 23:01 On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:33:04 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> I doubt you even get the irony. >> >>You certainly don't, that's for sure. > > So, by pointing out the irony of your angry little foot stomping, I dont > get the irony. > > Seriously, how stupid are you. Seriously, not as much as you. Thank God. One thing I'm wondering: were you born this stupid, did your mother shake you, or do you spend long, hard hours with a ball-peen hammer to obtain your level of ignorance? I think spending hours and hours trolling on Usenet might be making your brain atrophy. It's apparent your brain is not getting much use.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 4 Apr 2010 23:39 On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 22:59:53 -0400, mixed nuts wrote: >> Why did Mass elect a Republican to take Kennedy's place? >> > Do you line in MA? 'Cuz I do. No exit polls (what's up with that?). 35 > phone messages each week plus a dozen more on weekends from Scott Brown or > Tea baggers. The 10 I answered were automated push polls (Martha Coakley > favors murdering babies...). Martha Coakley came to town - her visit was > unpublished (I did get a phone call from a neighbor). Scott Brown came to > town - posters everywhere, front page of the local newspaper and on the > *non-local* teevee news. Progressive programming on the one progressive > station in the Boston market preempted by informercials from gravel voiced > preachers talking about the evils of socialism, healthcare and gumment > terrism... > > Money bomb. I think you can guess who I voted for, eh? Now, coming from Mass, you know Brown's not going to be a full-blown right-wing Republican. I got one of the phone calls after a few of them and I said, "I'm already voting for Brown, but I might change my mind if I get one more phone call". They stopped immediately. However, then the calls from Coakley started coming in. I started screening calls after that. I don't know if exit polls are allowed in the Commonwealth any more. Maybe if Coakley's visit had been published she might have picked up more support. I particularly liked the ad comparing Brown to Bush and especially Limbaugh, with a picture of Limbaugh waving to someone and looking like he was getting ready to say Seig Heil! The negative ads from Coakley did not go over very well. It was a poorly run campaign, and shoving a reporter to the ground sure didn't help. Tolerant Liberals! Where in Mass are you? I'm in the Ct Valley. I think Brown could be a big surprise to the Republican part. He voted for the "jobs" bill right off the bat, and he said when he ran that he would do what he thought wsas best for the people of Mass and the US. That might possibly mean siding with Democrats when warranted. Think Coakley would have sided with Republicans at all? I'm sure you got the rhetoric from her campaign, and all the time saying Brown would "march in lock step with Republicans". Heh...like she wouldn't march in lock step with Democrats. Time will tell. So far I like Brown's take on things. Now, to send you spinning off your nut: have you heard Brown on Howie Carr's show? ;p
From: Aratzio on 5 Apr 2010 01:02
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 22:34:58 -0400, in the land of alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:25:43 -0700, Aratzio wrote: > >> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 22:08:36 -0400, in the land of >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got >> double secret probation for writing: >> >>>On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 18:43:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 12:06:56 -0400, in the land of >>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>>> got double secret probation for writing: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:50:17 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:05:12 -0400, in the land of >>>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> >>>>>> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:38:44 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:17:05 -0400, in the land of >>>>>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? >>>>>>>> <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:03:06 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 22:24:58 -0400, in the land of >>>>>>>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? >>>>>>>>>> <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:06:33 -0700, Aratzio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>In the hopes that you'll get educated. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, you didn't understand what I wrote. Hint: "I know you and >>>>>>>>>>>> Obungler are elitist snobs" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have no intellectual curiosity and have the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intellectual depth of saran wrap. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And I don't need to be spoonfed, either. Tell me, what do you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>use for sources, O Wise One? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already gave you several. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So why not tell us who spoonfed you your ignorance: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless, you are a selfmade ignoramous? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Coming from one who doesn't know the uses of the word >>>>>>>>>>>>>"cognizant" and has to have a Swede explain it to him. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> BWAHAAAAHAAAAAAA >>>>>>>>>>>> She was laughing at you >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Um, at *ME*? Have another look. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "OK, so you are not typing in your sleep. I guess that's nice to >>>>>>>>>> know." >>>>>>>>>So, the only difinition of 'cognizant' is 'awake'? After all this >>>>>>>>>this is all you got from it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, you idiot, that was Veronica pointing out your stupidity. The >>>>>>>> synonym she spanked you with was "conscious". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That she had to go to a synonym points out your stupidity. That you >>>>>>>> figured out your only defense was a synonym, that does not fit, is >>>>>>>> just how stupid you are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>God, are you ignorant. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> That's it? Your going with that one? No tirade about how you don't >>>>>> care and that it doesn't mean anything to you? >>>>> >>>>>No one can handle someone who is just plain ignorant. >>>> >>>> Maybe if you ignore the fact you were wrong every step of the way, >>>> stamp feetsies and whine no one will notice you were an idiot. >>> >>>But, I'm not. I know how to use the word. You didn't even know what it >>>was until a Swede gave you a definition. Then you try and tell me how to >>>use a word you never heard before. Nice try...not. >> >> She has told you she was laughing AT you for your usage. You are one of >> those people immune to facts. >> >> Define the word. > >I'm done playing with you, you ignorant troll. >If you can't figure it out from the references I gave you, then you're >dumber than a box of rocks. I used a clinical definition, and it's >obviously over your head. Go play somewhere else now. And am I worried >that a Swede laughed at me? I wouldn't count on it. Poor little whiny baby. Maybe if you act even more put out you will *win*. -- Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues: Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2(a)news.eternal-september.org> I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against his knees... |