From: Ray O on 19 Jun 2010 18:45 "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hvirss$vli$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in message > news:hviqve$s00$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "jake" <jake.pinneberg(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:962d74b2-d573-4a55-bc71-ac2c5c0a659e(a)z15g2000prh.googlegroups.com... >>> It's just a small star-shaped glass fracture presently. >>> I'd like to keep it from expanding. Any recommendations? >>> (Permatex products don't get rave reviews on Amazon.) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jake >> >> >> As Jeff Strickland and Ron mentioned, glass shops use a process that >> yields good results. The resin that they use is cured with UV light. >> >> Some insurance companies will wave the deductible for this repair since >> the repair is less costly than a windshield replacement. >> -- >> > > There's a catch to waving the deductable, Ray. My insurance guy (Auto > Club) said there is a scam where glass shops are making claims for chips > on cars that have not come in for repairs. > > I don't know the details, exactly, but I _think_ the scam goes sorta like > this ... > > I bring my car in with a chip and the carrier pays the repair. > The glass shop keeps my information. > After a few months, the glass shop makes a second claim. Then a third, and > so on. Multiple cars and multiple claims could provide significant bogus > costs paid by the carriers. > > Another scenario is a claimant and a glass shop working together to make a > claim for a chip that does not exist and splitting the claim payment. > > > The bottom line is that fixing a chip is so cheap that the insurance > companies might not cover it anymore thanks to unscrupulous shops making > bogus claims. > I hadn't heard of that scam. I guess the solution is to stick to a reputable glass or body shop. -- Ray O (correct punctuation to reply)
From: Jeff Strickland on 20 Jun 2010 11:25 "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in message news:hvjhqq$ugf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrjeff(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hvirss$vli$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in message >> news:hviqve$s00$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> >>> "jake" <jake.pinneberg(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:962d74b2-d573-4a55-bc71-ac2c5c0a659e(a)z15g2000prh.googlegroups.com... >>>> It's just a small star-shaped glass fracture presently. >>>> I'd like to keep it from expanding. Any recommendations? >>>> (Permatex products don't get rave reviews on Amazon.) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jake >>> >>> >>> As Jeff Strickland and Ron mentioned, glass shops use a process that >>> yields good results. The resin that they use is cured with UV light. >>> >>> Some insurance companies will wave the deductible for this repair since >>> the repair is less costly than a windshield replacement. >>> -- >>> >> >> There's a catch to waving the deductable, Ray. My insurance guy (Auto >> Club) said there is a scam where glass shops are making claims for chips >> on cars that have not come in for repairs. >> >> I don't know the details, exactly, but I _think_ the scam goes sorta like >> this ... >> >> I bring my car in with a chip and the carrier pays the repair. >> The glass shop keeps my information. >> After a few months, the glass shop makes a second claim. Then a third, >> and so on. Multiple cars and multiple claims could provide significant >> bogus costs paid by the carriers. >> >> Another scenario is a claimant and a glass shop working together to make >> a claim for a chip that does not exist and splitting the claim payment. >> >> >> The bottom line is that fixing a chip is so cheap that the insurance >> companies might not cover it anymore thanks to unscrupulous shops making >> bogus claims. >> > > I hadn't heard of that scam. I guess the solution is to stick to a > reputable glass or body shop. > -- The insurance comapny solves the scam by not waiving the deductable for a chip. I suppose the waiving is decided by the company. I just paid the tab for the chip repair and moved on.
From: larry moe 'n curly on 20 Jun 2010 13:39 jake wrote: > > It's just a small star-shaped glass fracture presently. > I'd like to keep it from expanding. Any recommendations? > (Permatex products don't get rave reviews on Amazon.) The Permatex kits I've seen were only for bull's eye cracks, but a long time ago, a friend of mine had good luck with a kit claimed to fix star fractures. Instead of UV-cure resin, it used 2-part epoxy (resin and hardener not 1:1 ratio) and required the syringe plunger be manipulated in very specific ways (push down and pull up quickly, push down and hold for several minutes, pull up and hold, etc.) over a period of an hour, to work the resin all the way in and eliminate air bubbles.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: If Novins is Smart He'll Appeal the Unjust Decision Next: Type 3 Diabetes? |