What would Jesus ask a Darwinian? A possible explanation
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: Strip the Global Warming Hoax from US Classrooms
Next: These are the laws that will protect the Cyclists under the Revolution
From: CharlesGrozny on 5 Jun 2010 20:26 "Studemania" <midlant(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:5bbfbd0b-8084-4c14-946d-ed6728d879ce(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 5, 2:01 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the > Movement of Tantra-Hammock" <comandante.ban...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Jun 5, 4:34 pm, "J.H.Boersema" <jo...(a)xs4all.nl> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 2010-06-05, His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement >> > of Tantra-Hammock <comandante.ban...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > > (What a stupid question, right? Not so fast, that was posted in >> > > another group and I give a possible explanation) >> >> > > Jesus would say, >> > > "What time is it, pal?" >> > > And the Darwinian would ask, "What for?" >> > > And Jesus would say, >> > > "I have an important dinner tonight." >> >> > > And the Darwinian went around his business thinking what a stupid >> > > question that was in those times. >> >> > > "It's time for REVOLUTION," he added. >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > WHEN IT IS TIME FOR REVOLUTION >> > >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION >> >> > I suppose it might happen like that, because jesus had nothing more to >> > offer then empty whaffle. >> >> > When I'm meeting with a Darwinian, which I already tried to also >> > online, >> > I tell them: "you missed something, it is called 'technology." >> > The Darwinian as a rule doesn't dare to react, so I am assuming the >> > Darwining thinks: ``is this discovery going to cost me my tenure,'' or >> > unfortunately more likely ``get out of the way you maggot.'' Then I'd >> > try again and say: "technology changes who survive for the human >> > species, infighting is no longer necessary to outsrip the power of >> > other >> > technology-less creatures." If the Darwinian was paying any attention >> > he >> > (why is it always a he?) may start to worry about his tenure - for >> > failing to miss the obvious. Then I might say: "If you don't persue the >> > revolution now, you may very well lose your life together with your >> > tenure." >> >> > Sadly, nobody seems to realize that it is true, or how serious and >> > pressing the situation really is. So, good luck with the 3rd world war >> > then, have a blast y'all ! >> >> > PS, I tried to find out what your Banana-revolution means, but no clear >> > idea. Tip: delete your site and pop mine in its place, thanks. >> > Maybe something might change, then (ideally for the better). >> > -- >> > _ _ /_\ _ _http://www.SOCIALISM.nlFreemarkets and democracy, >> > \ /v`vvv\ / but now: properly. >> > /_\_#_#_/_\ >> > \ / Day 39 of the revolution. >> >> Very clever thoughts there! It reminds me of these quotations... >> >> "There is no wilderness where I can hide from these things, there is >> no haven where I can escape them; though I travel to the ends of the >> earth, I find the same accursed system � I find that all the fair and >> noble impulses of humanity, the dreams of poets and the agonies of >> martyrs, are shackled and bound in the service of organized and >> predatory Greed!" >> >> and... >> >> "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job >> depends on not understanding it." >> >> They are the words of Upton Sinclair in 'The Jungle,' written in 1906. >> It seems like not much has change after all. Actually things seem to >> have gotten worse ever since that Jesus made it to the Last Supper on >> time. We are still waiting for the miracle and the prophet. >> >> Well the predators of the jungle have always known it's all about >> PREDATION... so do we. >> >> http://atom.smasher.org/streetparty/?l1=Coming+Soon%3A&l2=the&l3=Bana...- >> Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > I've always assumed that Darwin realized that nature and acts of man > were of little import in the long run or should be ignored as they are > not part of a "long-term plan." > > Given repeatab;e weather cycles, the changed of a stream bed could be > calculkaated. Trow in an earthquake and the game changes. Given Monkey Stretcher's original ridiculous, factless post above, and he wonders why I consider him Joey's sock puppet. Charles Grozny
From: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock on 5 Jun 2010 21:42 On Jun 5, 8:26 pm, "CharlesGrozny" <n5...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > "Studemania" <midl...(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > > news:5bbfbd0b-8084-4c14-946d-ed6728d879ce(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On Jun 5, 2:01 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the > > Movement of Tantra-Hammock" <comandante.ban...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 5, 4:34 pm, "J.H.Boersema" <jo...(a)xs4all.nl> wrote: > > >> > On 2010-06-05, His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement > >> > of Tantra-Hammock <comandante.ban...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> > > (What a stupid question, right? Not so fast, that was posted in > >> > > another group and I give a possible explanation) > > >> > > Jesus would say, > >> > > "What time is it, pal?" > >> > > And the Darwinian would ask, "What for?" > >> > > And Jesus would say, > >> > > "I have an important dinner tonight." > > >> > > And the Darwinian went around his business thinking what a stupid > >> > > question that was in those times. > > >> > > "It's time for REVOLUTION," he added. > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > WHEN IT IS TIME FOR REVOLUTION > >> > >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION > > >> > I suppose it might happen like that, because jesus had nothing more to > >> > offer then empty whaffle. > > >> > When I'm meeting with a Darwinian, which I already tried to also > >> > online, > >> > I tell them: "you missed something, it is called 'technology." > >> > The Darwinian as a rule doesn't dare to react, so I am assuming the > >> > Darwining thinks: ``is this discovery going to cost me my tenure,'' or > >> > unfortunately more likely ``get out of the way you maggot.'' Then I'd > >> > try again and say: "technology changes who survive for the human > >> > species, infighting is no longer necessary to outsrip the power of > >> > other > >> > technology-less creatures." If the Darwinian was paying any attention > >> > he > >> > (why is it always a he?) may start to worry about his tenure - for > >> > failing to miss the obvious. Then I might say: "If you don't persue the > >> > revolution now, you may very well lose your life together with your > >> > tenure." > > >> > Sadly, nobody seems to realize that it is true, or how serious and > >> > pressing the situation really is. So, good luck with the 3rd world war > >> > then, have a blast y'all ! > > >> > PS, I tried to find out what your Banana-revolution means, but no clear > >> > idea. Tip: delete your site and pop mine in its place, thanks. > >> > Maybe something might change, then (ideally for the better). > >> > -- > >> > _ _ /_\ _ _http://www.SOCIALISM.nlFreemarketsand democracy, > >> > \ /v`vvv\ / but now: properly. > >> > /_\_#_#_/_\ > >> > \ / Day 39 of the revolution. > > >> Very clever thoughts there! It reminds me of these quotations... > > >> "There is no wilderness where I can hide from these things, there is > >> no haven where I can escape them; though I travel to the ends of the > >> earth, I find the same accursed system � I find that all the fair and > >> noble impulses of humanity, the dreams of poets and the agonies of > >> martyrs, are shackled and bound in the service of organized and > >> predatory Greed!" > > >> and... > > >> "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job > >> depends on not understanding it." > > >> They are the words of Upton Sinclair in 'The Jungle,' written in 1906. > >> It seems like not much has change after all. Actually things seem to > >> have gotten worse ever since that Jesus made it to the Last Supper on > >> time. We are still waiting for the miracle and the prophet. > > >> Well the predators of the jungle have always known it's all about > >> PREDATION... so do we. > > >>http://atom.smasher.org/streetparty/?l1=Coming+Soon%3A&l2=the&l3=Bana... > >> Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > I've always assumed that Darwin realized that nature and acts of man > > were of little import in the long run or should be ignored as they are > > not part of a "long-term plan." > > > Given repeatab;e weather cycles, the changed of a stream bed could be > > calculkaated. Trow in an earthquake and the game changes. > > Given Monkey Stretcher's original ridiculous, factless post above, and he > wonders why I consider him Joey's sock puppet. > > Charles Grozny Nothing to be concerned about, folks, it's only Revolution... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imb4tYOk8GE
From: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock on 5 Jun 2010 21:48 The Revolution of the Species? It's all possible in the jungle... The Revolution of the Species: An Environmental Thriller When toxic waste chemicals from a secret government research centre creating DNA-changing drugs for the military start to leak into the environment, the effects on the eco-system have sudden and profound effects for humankind's supremacy of the planet. As the government dithers and delays, the crisis becomes greater and more widespread, eventually causing international intrigue and diplomatic incidents. Will the planet survive in its current state or will the revolution of the species succeed? It's all down to one man in particular: but can he create an antidote in time, as he avoids and fights the government and vested interests? And who is working for whom? Whatever the outcome, our planet will never be the same again... http://www.amazon.com/Revolution-Species-Environmental-Thriller/dp/1425947506 But, like I say, nothing to be concerned about.
From: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock on 6 Jun 2010 00:25 On Jun 5, 11:46 pm, James A. Donald <jam...(a)echeque.com> wrote: > Cities are civilization, more or less. White people build > cities, black people don't to anything like the same extent - > observe what happened to Detroit, Leopoldville and Salisbury > when the blacks took over, and what is happening to > Johannesburg. They are turning into ghost towns. People > whose skeletons look like those of white people first > appeared about ten thousand years ago or so, cities appeared > about eight thousand years ago. The obvious implication is > that around eight or ten thousand years ago, some humans > evolved into city building creatures, civilization building > creatures - that Darwinian evolution first created civilization > building creatures ten thousand years ago or so. > > Civilizations started to be built about as soon as the first > race that builds civilizations showed up. The little Indians of South America with their great civilizations seem to challenge to a great degree your white supremacy theory. Germans destroyed themselves for no reason other than to rebuild themselves and prove their superiority once again. ;) On the other hand Rome had a great civilization that was as Barbaric as the Barbarians, so everything is relative. The blacks of Africa, probably lived better in tribes than in an urban center. But our urban centers are starting to look like a jungle, so the cycle never stops. And the "successful" alpha males/females in SUVs are killing our planet. Perhaps we need more losers to ride bikes.
From: Sharx35 on 6 Jun 2010 02:51
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock" <nolionnoproblem(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:dde67b1d-f492-4734-8ff8-771598950de4(a)d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 5, 11:46 pm, James A. Donald <jam...(a)echeque.com> wrote: > >> Cities are civilization, more or less. White people build >> cities, black people don't to anything like the same extent - >> observe what happened to Detroit, Leopoldville and Salisbury >> when the blacks took over, and what is happening to >> Johannesburg. They are turning into ghost towns. People >> whose skeletons look like those of white people first >> appeared about ten thousand years ago or so, cities appeared >> about eight thousand years ago. The obvious implication is >> that around eight or ten thousand years ago, some humans >> evolved into city building creatures, civilization building >> creatures - that Darwinian evolution first created civilization >> building creatures ten thousand years ago or so. >> >> Civilizations started to be built about as soon as the first >> race that builds civilizations showed up. > > The little Indians of South America with their great civilizations > seem to challenge to a great degree your white supremacy theory. > > Germans destroyed themselves for no reason other than to rebuild > themselves and prove their superiority once again. ;) > > On the other hand Rome had a great civilization that was as Barbaric > as the Barbarians, so everything is relative. > > The blacks of Africa, probably lived better in tribes than in an urban > center. But our urban centers are starting to look like a jungle, so > the cycle never stops. > > And the "successful" alpha males/females in SUVs are killing our > planet. Perhaps we need more losers to ride bikes. Well, you certainly have started the process--the process of losers riding bikes, that is. > |