From: Moon Goddess on
"Cathy F." <clfrclfr(a)adelphia.net> wrote :

>
> "Moon Goddess" <MG(a)no-spam.www> wrote in message
> news:xKmdndRcKdOSxzPbnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d(a)forethought.net...
>> EdV <systmengr(a)hotmail.com> wrote :
>>
>>> What kind of driving do you expect to do that you need a 4WD? snow,
>>> mountain climbing, dirt roads, are you going to tow anything, do
>>> you need a small 4wd or large 4wd.
>>>
>>
>> Mostly city snow driving. I need something as fuel efficient as
>> possible, I do a lot of business driving.
>
> Then I'd stick with front wheel drive, & give it tires which are
> rated as very good/excellent in snow.

Sounds wise, thanks Cathy.

From: Moon Goddess on
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis(a)yahoo.com> wrote :

> "Moon Goddess" <MG(a)no-spam.www> wrote in message
> news:z4WdnWYlucRXwDPbnZ2dnUVZ_vjinZ2d(a)forethought.net...
>> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote :
>>
>>> In article <xKmdndRcKdOSxzPbnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d(a)forethought.net>,
>>> Moon Goddess <MG(a)no-spam.www> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > What kind of driving do you expect to do that you need a 4WD?
>>>> > snow, mountain climbing, dirt roads, are you going to tow
>>>> > anything, do you need a small 4wd or large 4wd.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Mostly city snow driving. I need something as fuel efficient as
>>>> possible, I do a lot of business driving.
>>>
>>> Then you do NOT want a vehicle that is able to drive all four
>>> wheels.
>>> Those mechanisms all weigh something, which costs gas to haul
>>> around
>>> all the time. It's like having another person in the car at all
>>> times. That extra gas costs $$$. It's a MPG penalty.
>>>
>>> Plus, all those systems require maintenance of their own, above and
>>> beyond what their 2wd brothers need. That also costs $$$.
>>>
>>> City driving? You'll be fine with front wheel drive and good
>>> tires. I heavily recommend Nokian WR. Absolute worst case, you buy
>>> snow tires with a more aggressive tread as well as a winter rating,
>>> and you run those during winter. But city driving? Paved roads
>>> that get plowed? You don't need 4wd or awd at all.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Only the main roads get plowed here and much of my work is driving
>> into the back neighborhoods, where I had a heck of a time last
>> winter with sometimes 6" of snow in the streets.
>>
>> There's a hill along the street our driveway exits onto and even
>> that gets hard to get out of when it snows more than a few inches,
>> and the city cares not about it.
>>
>
> My prediction: Within 60 days of the snow starting, you'll drive your
> 4WD thing into a ditch and wonder why it didn't work like magic.
>
> Get a front wheel drive SOMETHING, and some very serious snow tires.
> Blizzak is a good example of a tire that would make you happy.
> Oh...and learn to drive.
>
>
>

Well humphh. :) I drive very well thank you. You just haven't seen the
mess that they leave most residential streets in, in the Denver area
after a decent storm.



From: Moon Goddess on
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote :

> In article <z4WdnWYlucRXwDPbnZ2dnUVZ_vjinZ2d(a)forethought.net>,
> Moon Goddess <MG(a)no-spam.www> wrote:
>
>> > City driving? You'll be fine with front wheel drive and good
>> > tires. I heavily recommend Nokian WR. Absolute worst case, you
>> > buy snow tires with a more aggressive tread as well as a winter
>> > rating, and you run those during winter. But city driving? Paved
>> > roads that get plowed? You don't need 4wd or awd at all.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Only the main roads get plowed here and much of my work is driving
>> into the back neighborhoods, where I had a heck of a time last
>> winter with sometimes 6" of snow in the streets.
>
> Just get real snow tires for your Corolla, and see what that does for
> you this winter.
>
> I'm pretty sure you'll be amazed.
>
> BTW--I charge only 10% of what you save with my advice. So let's
> see.....$23,000 you saved by not buying a Prius, less $500 you spent
> for good snow tires.....$22,500....you owe me $2250.
>
>


LOL! :)

From: Go Mavs on

"Moon Goddess" <MG(a)no-spam.www> wrote in message
news:z4WdnWYlucRXwDPbnZ2dnUVZ_vjinZ2d(a)forethought.net...
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop(a)nastydesigns.com> wrote :
>
>> In article <xKmdndRcKdOSxzPbnZ2dnUVZ_uLinZ2d(a)forethought.net>,
>> Moon Goddess <MG(a)no-spam.www> wrote:
>>
>>> > What kind of driving do you expect to do that you need a 4WD?
>>> > snow, mountain climbing, dirt roads, are you going to tow
>>> > anything, do you need a small 4wd or large 4wd.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Mostly city snow driving. I need something as fuel efficient as
>>> possible, I do a lot of business driving.
>>
>> Then you do NOT want a vehicle that is able to drive all four wheels.
>> Those mechanisms all weigh something, which costs gas to haul around
>> all the time. It's like having another person in the car at all
>> times. That extra gas costs $$$. It's a MPG penalty.
>>
>> Plus, all those systems require maintenance of their own, above and
>> beyond what their 2wd brothers need. That also costs $$$.
>>
>> City driving? You'll be fine with front wheel drive and good tires.
>> I heavily recommend Nokian WR. Absolute worst case, you buy snow
>> tires with a more aggressive tread as well as a winter rating, and
>> you run those during winter. But city driving? Paved roads that get
>> plowed? You don't need 4wd or awd at all.
>>
>>
>
> Only the main roads get plowed here and much of my work is driving into
> the back neighborhoods, where I had a heck of a time last winter with
> sometimes 6" of snow in the streets.
>
> There's a hill along the street our driveway exits onto and even that
> gets hard to get out of when it snows more than a few inches, and the
> city cares not about it.


then get a ford escape hybrid and shut up


From: High Tech Misfit on
Jeff wrote:

> Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>> In article <2xqrmtlv64yu.dlg(a)hightech.misfit>,
>> High Tech Misfit <me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> I haven't about the reliability of Escapes, but the Contour is a pretty
>>>> reliable car, with many going to 250 to 300k or more.
>>>>
>>> Thanks for providing me with a much needed laugh for the day.
>>
>> he was talking engine revolutions, not miles.
>
> No, i was talking about miles. My engine runs as smoothly as the day it
> was new.

And again I say, you have been very, very lucky with yours.