From: Aratzio on
On Tue, 18 May 2010 23:57:00 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>>>
>>>Who said I liked Gingrich or Mitt-For-Brains? I sure didn't.
>>
>> Do try to have your reading make sense.
>>
>> No one said you did, however they are wingnuts just like you.
>>
>>>You make assumptions and the fact is you know little or nothing. Just
>>>another Liberal I can turn into a seething foaming mongrel anytime I see
>>>fit.
>>
>> So, again, because you can't read, it is all my fault. Using examples of
>> similar wingnut stupidity does not an assumption make.
>>
>> So do you apologize now for your failure in reading?
>>

Well, you going to apologize for your reading skills?


--

Hachiroku showing off his word salad flaming skills:
"Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working."
(Don't you just hate when they catch you faking their stupidity)

Hachiroku with a short flash of self-awareness:
Message-ID: <BKiIn.17617$mi.8319(a)newsfe01.iad>
> Now, as to your use of "one line unthinking responses", why do you feel
> those are such an unqualified success amongst the ToyotaTards? Short
> attention spans, pig ignorance or just plain old fashioned low IQ stupid?
>
Could be all of them.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:58:54 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> On Tue, 18 May 2010 23:57:00 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>> "I know you are but what am I"
>>> If it were not for plagiarism you couldn't post.
>>>
>>>
> Yep, no response.

Sixteen responses, all saying the same thing: Nothing.
Way to go, Ratzhole!

From: Aratzio on
On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:08:30 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
writing:

>On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:58:54 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 23:57:00 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>> "I know you are but what am I"
>>>> If it were not for plagiarism you couldn't post.
>>>>
>>>>
>> Yep, no response.
>
>Sixteen responses, all saying the same thing: Nothing.
>Way to go, Ratzhole!

Well, if you weren't such a coward I wouldn't have to point out your
cowardice so much.

But the poast count was a little lacking so I figured what the hell,
he's a coward, make him respond to each one or look even more cowardly
than normal.


--

Hachiroku showing off his word salad flaming skills:
"Hey, and if you're *feigning* stupidity, rest assured: it's working."
(Don't you just hate when they catch you faking their stupidity)

Hachiroku with a short flash of self-awareness:
Message-ID: <BKiIn.17617$mi.8319(a)newsfe01.iad>
> Now, as to your use of "one line unthinking responses", why do you feel
> those are such an unqualified success amongst the ToyotaTards? Short
> attention spans, pig ignorance or just plain old fashioned low IQ stupid?
>
Could be all of them.
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 19 May 2010 19:42:03 -0500, Fred Hall wrote:

> On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:08:30 -0400, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>
>>Sixteen responses, all saying the same thing: Nothing.
>
> Since you've brought it up, I am truly disturbed by your multiple
> responses saying nothing.


Have to keep it to something Ratzhole will comprehend.

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Wed, 19 May 2010 17:40:57 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

> On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:08:30 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing:
>
>>On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:58:54 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 23:57:00 -0400, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
>>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
>>> writing:
>>>
>>>>> "I know you are but what am I"
>>>>> If it were not for plagiarism you couldn't post.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Yep, no response.
>>
>>Sixteen responses, all saying the same thing: Nothing. Way to go,
>>Ratzhole!
>
> Well, if you weren't such a coward I wouldn't have to point out your
> cowardice so much.
>
> But the poast count was a little lacking so I figured what the hell, he's
> a coward, make him respond to each one or look even more cowardly than
> normal.

And all it really accomplished was to make you look more foolish than
normal.

It's spelled "post". Adolescents use the other spelling.

Sorry, forgot I was dealing with a 60 year old juvenile.