Veterans day: Republican blocks bill that wold only help vets
in [Toyota]
|
Prev: All 2009-2010 models with pictures, prices and specs
Next: Week after elections, repulsivcans STILL claim victoy for defeating a republican
From: ByTor on 12 Nov 2009 11:50 In article <hdhdel$3n4$3(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, gburnore(a)databasix.com says... > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:55:36 -0500, ByTor <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > >In article <hdg09b$mle$3(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, > >gburnore(a)databasix.com says... > >> > >> How hypocritical can ya get, repubs? > > > >Can you post some kind of referance? > ' > Sure: > > http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/11/military_coburnhold_veteransbill_110409w/ > > http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=65904 > > http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091112/NEWS01/911120348/Hawaii+senator+s+new+benefits+for+veterans+blocked+by+Republican > > http://www.cnjonline.com/opinion/veterans-35868-oct-holding.html > > http://www.thenewstribune.com/business/story/945201.html Thank You!
From: ByTor on 12 Nov 2009 11:58 In article <38f91284-6011-46a0-865c-cc61b59ef854 @x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com says... > > On Nov 12, 11:37 am, Gary L. Burnore <gburn...(a)databasix.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:55:36 -0500, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > >In article <hdg09b$ml...(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, > > >gburn...(a)databasix.com says... > > > > >> How hypocritical can ya get, repubs? > > > > >Can you post some kind of referance? > > > > ' > > Sure: > > > > http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/11/military_coburnhold_veteransbil.... > > > > http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=65904 > > > > http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091112/NEWS01/911120348/H.... > > > > http://www.cnjonline.com/opinion/veterans-35868-oct-holding.html > > > > http://www.thenewstribune.com/business/story/945201.html > > I can't wait for the spin. This should be good. Thanks for the > articles. What spin is that might I ask? The question is *how* to pay for it that's the *responsible* & realistic question to ask, something democrats don't seem to care about just spend spend spend. My suggestion, all these *PRIVATE* companies that benefit from *WARS* should be hit with fees to help fund war veterans........Wow, that would be a fantasy eh. The bottom line issue here is that it's once again an issue to *STAB* a republican with instead of doing the *RIGHT* thing & working with each other......That's a fantasy to.
From: Gary L. Burnore on 12 Nov 2009 12:03 On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:58:02 -0500, ByTor <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote: >In article <38f91284-6011-46a0-865c-cc61b59ef854 >@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com says... >> >> On Nov 12, 11:37�am, Gary L. Burnore <gburn...(a)databasix.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:55:36 -0500, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: >> > >In article <hdg09b$ml...(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, >> > >gburn...(a)databasix.com says... >> > >> > >> How hypocritical can ya get, repubs? >> > >> > >Can you post some kind of referance? >> > >> > ' >> > Sure: >> > >> > http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/11/military_coburnhold_veteransbil... >> > >> > http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=65904 >> > >> > http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091112/NEWS01/911120348/H... >> > >> > http://www.cnjonline.com/opinion/veterans-35868-oct-holding.html >> > >> > http://www.thenewstribune.com/business/story/945201.html >> >> I can't wait for the spin. This should be good. Thanks for the >> articles. > >What spin is that might I ask? The question is *how* to pay for it >that's the *responsible* & realistic question to ask, something >democrats don't seem to care about just spend spend spend. My >suggestion, all these *PRIVATE* companies that benefit from *WARS* >should be hit with fees to help fund war veterans........Wow, that would >be a fantasy eh. > >The bottom line issue here is that it's once again an issue to *STAB* a >republican with instead of doing the *RIGHT* thing & working with each >other......That's a fantasy to. He voted to pay so they could get injured but not so they'd get help. You don't have a problem paying for a bridge to nowhere in alaska but have a problem supporting the vets and their families that come back wounded from wars only you support. You're as pathetic as he is.
From: ByTor on 12 Nov 2009 12:22 In article <hdheul$3n4$18(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, gburnore(a)databasix.com says... > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:58:02 -0500, ByTor <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > >In article <38f91284-6011-46a0-865c-cc61b59ef854 > >@x16g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>, edspyhill01(a)gmail.com says... > >> > >> On Nov 12, 11:37 am, Gary L. Burnore <gburn...(a)databasix.com> wrote: > >> > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:55:36 -0500, ByTor <By...(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > >> > >In article <hdg09b$ml...(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, > >> > >gburn...(a)databasix.com says... > >> > > >> > >> How hypocritical can ya get, repubs? > >> > > >> > >Can you post some kind of referance? > >> > > >> > ' > >> > Sure: > >> > > >> > http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/11/military_coburnhold_veteransbil... > >> > > >> > http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=65904 > >> > > >> > http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20091112/NEWS01/911120348/H... > >> > > >> > http://www.cnjonline.com/opinion/veterans-35868-oct-holding.html > >> > > >> > http://www.thenewstribune.com/business/story/945201.html > >> > >> I can't wait for the spin. This should be good. Thanks for the > >> articles. > > > >What spin is that might I ask? The question is *how* to pay for it > >that's the *responsible* & realistic question to ask, something > >democrats don't seem to care about just spend spend spend. My > >suggestion, all these *PRIVATE* companies that benefit from *WARS* > >should be hit with fees to help fund war veterans........Wow, that would > >be a fantasy eh. > > > >The bottom line issue here is that it's once again an issue to *STAB* a > >republican with instead of doing the *RIGHT* thing & working with each > >other......That's a fantasy to. > > He voted to pay so they could get injured but not so they'd get help. > You don't have a problem paying for a bridge to nowhere in alaska but > have a problem supporting the vets and their families that come back > wounded from wars only you support. You're as pathetic as he is. Excuse me? Did you actually *READ* the *REAL* context of the issue or are you just *emotionally* spewing assumptions? How do you know my position on Alaska, are you psychic? Oh wait, you have the *brain block* in place assuming that I'm a republican so that automatically shuts you down to intelligent debate, I get it.
From: ByTor on 12 Nov 2009 20:43
In article <2kdpf5ta1lm3kag5c749or4hoijr66ri5f(a)4ax.com>, MoveOn(a)outa.here says... > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:37:59 -0500, Gary L. Burnore > <gburnore(a)databasix.com> wrote: > > >On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:55:36 -0500, ByTor <ByTor(a)snowdog.com> wrote: > > > >>In article <hdg09b$mle$3(a)blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, > >>gburnore(a)databasix.com says... > >>> > >>> How hypocritical can ya get, repubs? > >> > >>Can you post some kind of referance? > >' > >Sure: > > > >http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/11/military_coburnhold_veteransbill_110409w/ > > Perfectly logical reason to oppose a bill. > > > There should be MORE of that. > > How are we going to pay for it? The part that was missed was that this issue is *NOT* a matter of *denying* the benefits, it's how to pay for it. I thought my reading comprehension skills were bad, Jeeeeeeez! But the mere *FACT* that *because* it's a *republican* the brain block sheild activates & deflects any logical discussion & cooperation on an issue. It's a no wonder I keep saying it over & over, the division in this country is disgusting. |