From: Brent P on 13 May 2007 11:14 In article <newscache$um2zhj$c9k$1(a)news.ipinc.net>, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:vpadnfrkmoaBMNvbnZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d(a)comcast.com... >> In article <I3l1i.5129$3B5.754(a)trnddc08>, Jeff wrote: >> >> > The EPA has the duty to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from inanimate >> > objects. However, it is not empowered to regulate breathing. >> >> Ahh... the old environmentalist rules, only CO2 produced by certain >> activities in certain places is bad.... the global warming swindle in >> action. >> >> > Besides, breathing doesn't create carbon dioxide. Breathing only rids > the >> > blood of carbon dioxide made elsewhere in the body. >> >> If you don't breath it doesn't come out of the body. >> >> > > Please, quit breathing so we don't have to listen to your > foolishness. Learn to use a kill file if you have a problem.
From: n5hsr on 13 May 2007 11:55 <someone(a)some.domain> wrote in message news:UYF1i.5254$MW1.2009(a)fe03.news.easynews.com... > In article <Q_GdncdOUPipidrbnZ2dnUVZ_vmqnZ2d(a)comcast.com>, "n5hsr" > <n5hsr(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >><someone(a)some.domain> wrote in message >>news:veE1i.404378$c62.107366(a)fe07.news.easynews.com... >>> In article <n_CdnVm7Ess0btvbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d(a)comcast.com>, "n5hsr" >>> <n5hsr(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>>>"Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm(a)toybox.placo.com> wrote in message >>>>news:newscache$um2zhj$c9k$1(a)news.ipinc.net... >>>>> >>>>> "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:vpadnfrkmoaBMNvbnZ2dnUVZ_vHinZ2d(a)comcast.com... >>>>>> In article <I3l1i.5129$3B5.754(a)trnddc08>, Jeff wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > The EPA has the duty to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from >>>>>> > inanimate >>>>>> > objects. However, it is not empowered to regulate breathing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ahh... the old environmentalist rules, only CO2 produced by certain >>>>>> activities in certain places is bad.... the global warming swindle in >>>>>> action. >>>>>> >>>>>> > Besides, breathing doesn't create carbon dioxide. Breathing only >>>>>> > rids >>>>> the >>>>>> > blood of carbon dioxide made elsewhere in the body. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't breath it doesn't come out of the body. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please, quit breathing so we don't have to listen to your >>>>> foolishness. >>>>> >>>>> Ted >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>All of you environunts can do us a favor and quit emitting carbon >>>>dixoide >>>>now. >>>> >>>>Charles of Schauburg >>>> >>>> >>> oh boy! buzzword bingo. >> >>And I have a new tool: >> >>Block Message from Sender. >> >>Why don't you practice permanent breath holding? I'll wait. >> >>Charles of Schaumburg >> >> > go ahead. I'm still waitng. Charles of Schaumburg
From: n5hsr on 13 May 2007 11:56 "Shep" <djsljsrn(a)capital.net> wrote in message news:1178975496_11871(a)sp6iad.superfeed.net... > Hum, this is the same state that sentenced a child sexual predator to 6 > months of rehab!!! > "Larry Bud" <larrybud2002(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1178969220.418918.56610(a)p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >> On May 11, 6:17 pm, "C. E. White" <cewh...(a)mindspring.com> wrote: >>> I saw this article and thought the comment on Toyota hybrids near the >>> bottom >>> was interesting- "While hybrid technology has raised manufacturing >>> costs, >>> Toyota Motor Corp., maker of the Prius hybrid, expects cost-cutting on >>> hybrid production to make the cars as profitable as traditional gasoline >>> models by 2010. By that point it expects to be selling 1 million hybrids >>> a >>> year." >>> >>> ********************************************** >>> >>> Vermont could clear way for new U.S. emissions rules >>> >>> Reuters | >>> May 11, 2007 - 9:00 am >>> >>> BOSTON (Reuters) -- A Vermont judge could soon clear the way for nearly >>> a >>> dozen states to surmount auto industry protests and limit emissions from >>> cars and light trucks to protect the environment, legal experts said. >>> >>> The rural northeastern state in 2005 followed California's lead in >>> calling >>> for a 30 percent cut in the amount of carbon dioxide, the main gas >>> blamed >>> for global warming, emitted from automobiles starting with 2009 models. >>> U.S. >>> automakers have sued both states, and Rhode Island, seeking to have the >>> rules overturned. >>> >>> Vermont's suit is the first to go to trial. >> >> If they really believe what they're suing for, they should immediately >> ban the import of all cars and light trucks. >> > > > > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet > News==---- > http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ > Newsgroups > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption > =---- Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys must be turing over their collective graves. Charles of Schaumburg
From: DJ on 14 May 2007 11:29 > > And let's see how long it takes before they try to regulate breathing. > Lesser beings will only be allowed to breathe on alternate days. No Farting > allowed. > That would fall under methane production which would require a new law. You will probably need a permit or something. Maybe there will be methane collection stations where we can all fart into coffee cans and get "carbon credits" for helping to generate renewable resources. -dj-
From: Edwin Pawlowski on 14 May 2007 22:27 "DJ" <dont(a)send.spam> wrote in message > Maybe there will be methane collection stations where we can all fart > into coffee cans and get "carbon credits" for helping to generate > renewable resources. > > -dj- Great idea. I'd bet Al Gore would buy them to fuel his big house.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: 2000 sienna - change transmission fluid Next: securikey+ programming and manual |