From: Mike Hunter on 12 May 2007 15:20 Whether one can take up smoking, or not, would depend on the city or state in which one resides, wouldn't it? By the way, when did CO2 become a pollutant. Like ozone the largest producer of CO2 is nature, by far. Do the environuts now want the EPA to regulate nature? If so, finally we have reached the point the nuts are actually running the asylum LOL mike "Jeff" <news(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:JBi1i.28755$Ae.7028(a)trnddc07... > > "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:R8adnUzvwLWc2djbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d(a)comcast.com... >> >> So, now the federal government through the EPA can regulate our >> breathing? ? > > The EPA doesn't regulate your breathing. They do make it so you have clean > air to breath, though. > > If you want to breath dirty air, take up smoking. > > Jeff
From: Mike Hunter on 12 May 2007 15:29 I remember when the Environmental Protection Act was enacted under the auspiciousness of a Republican President. A friend remarked, finally the federal government has done something to protect the people. A more astute friend profoundly remarked, but who will protect the people from the EPA in twenty years or so? LOL mike "Jeff" <news(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:I3l1i.5129$3B5.754(a)trnddc08... > > "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:Zo6dnVogXaTSQdjbnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d(a)comcast.com... >> In article <JBi1i.28755$Ae.7028(a)trnddc07>, Jeff wrote: >>> >>> "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:R8adnUzvwLWc2djbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d(a)comcast.com... >>>> In article <eY51i.14211$3P3.3086(a)newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>, C. >>>> E. >>>> White wrote: >>>> >>>>> The Vermont trial began shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in >>>>> an >>>>> unrelated case that carbon dioxide can be regulated as a pollutant, >>>>> rejecting a 2003 argument by the federal Environmental Protection >>>>> Agency >>>>> that it did not have authority over carbon dioxide. >>>> >>>> So, now the federal government through the EPA can regulate our >>>> breathing? ? >>> >>> No. However, the EPA does regulate the pollution that is put into the >>> atmosphere. For example, the EPA lowered the amount of sulfur oxides >>> that >>> are allowed to go into the atmosphere, thereby decreasing acid rain. >>> >>> The EPA doesn't regulate your breathing. They do make it so you have >>> clean >>> air to breath, though. >>> >>> If you want to breath dirty air, take up smoking. >> >> Um... if the EPA is going to have the power to regulate CARBON DIOXIDE, >> then can they regulate breathing which emits CARBON DIOXIDE? Have to >> explain everything around here these days. > > The EPA has the duty to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from inanimate > objects. However, it is not empowered to regulate breathing. > > Besides, breathing doesn't create carbon dioxide. Breathing only rids the > blood of carbon dioxide made elsewhere in the body. > > Jeff
From: Mike Hunter on 12 May 2007 15:41 The environuts are applauding the PETA-nuts campaign to get people to eat less beef, to reduce the number of cow farts, reduce pollution and save the world GMs secret plan to turn the corporation around,and reduce pollution in the US at the same time, is to begin building all of their vehicles in China. If they were smart the would move the corporate headquarters to Japan and get all of those tax brakes and get away from paying US federal corporate taxes The only problem is Toyota is already years ahead of them in plans to build most of their vehicles in China by 2015 LOL mike "n5hsr" <n5hsr(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:sKmdnT1_Jf99QNjbnZ2dnUVZ_vamnZ2d(a)comcast.com... > "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:Zo6dnVogXaTSQdjbnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d(a)comcast.com... >> In article <JBi1i.28755$Ae.7028(a)trnddc07>, Jeff wrote: >>> >>> "Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:R8adnUzvwLWc2djbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d(a)comcast.com... >>>> In article <eY51i.14211$3P3.3086(a)newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>, C. >>>> E. >>>> White wrote: >>>> >>>>> The Vermont trial began shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in >>>>> an >>>>> unrelated case that carbon dioxide can be regulated as a pollutant, >>>>> rejecting a 2003 argument by the federal Environmental Protection >>>>> Agency >>>>> that it did not have authority over carbon dioxide. >>>> >>>> So, now the federal government through the EPA can regulate our >>>> breathing? ? >>> >>> No. However, the EPA does regulate the pollution that is put into the >>> atmosphere. For example, the EPA lowered the amount of sulfur oxides >>> that >>> are allowed to go into the atmosphere, thereby decreasing acid rain. >>> >>> The EPA doesn't regulate your breathing. They do make it so you have >>> clean >>> air to breath, though. >>> >>> If you want to breath dirty air, take up smoking. >> >> Um... if the EPA is going to have the power to regulate CARBON DIOXIDE, >> then can they regulate breathing which emits CARBON DIOXIDE? Have to >> explain everything around here these days. >> >> > > And let's see how long it takes before they try to regulate breathing. > Lesser beings will only be allowed to breathe on alternate days. No > Farting allowed. > > So most of the left will be turning blue soon. Not soon enough. > > Charles of Schaumburg >
From: n5hsr on 12 May 2007 15:43 "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2(a)mailcity.com> wrote in message news:Z-Wdne451Ml8jdvbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d(a)ptd.net... > The environuts want us to breath every other day, to save the world. LOL > > mike > Maybe they should lead by example here? Charles of Schaumburg
From: PAuL on 13 May 2007 00:49 Brent P wrote: > > In article <eY51i.14211$3P3.3086(a)newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>, C. E. White wrote: > > > The Vermont trial began shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in an > > unrelated case that carbon dioxide can be regulated as a pollutant, > > rejecting a 2003 argument by the federal Environmental Protection Agency > > that it did not have authority over carbon dioxide. > > So, now the federal government through the EPA can regulate our > breathing? ? Yes. And tax it. Just like the Romans used to tax urine.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: 2000 sienna - change transmission fluid Next: securikey+ programming and manual |