Prev: {BS} Bill Clinton was right!
Next: Toyota more than just a brand in KY
From: Hachiroku on 10 Feb 2010 09:22
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:04:17 -0800, ACAR wrote:

> On Feb 9, 9:25 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:20:35 -0500, dr_jeff wrote:
>> >http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/business/energy-
environment/09noaa....
>>
>> And it's openeing has been delayed by cold and snow at the chosen
>> site...
>
> actually, as the article says, Congressional approval is required before
> the Agency is formed.
> at about 1/10 the size of the National Weather Service, you'd think it
> might be more efficient to make it an office within the NWS rather than
> another organization within NOAA.

There you go, applying common sense to the government again...

From: Mike Hunter on 10 Feb 2010 11:34
Will it ever end with all of these environuts? Lord help us all!


"dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
news:teOdnXUvsdFuiu_WnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/business/energy-environment/09noaa.html?ref=todayspaper


From: Mike Hunter on 10 Feb 2010 11:35
Don't you mean HAS already? LOL


"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:hkta0g$64n$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:49:33 -0800, Conscience wrote:
>
>> On 2010-02-09 18:25:28 -0800, Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS>
>> said:
>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:20:35 -0500, dr_jeff wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/business/energy-environment/09noaa.html?ref=todayspaper
>>
>>
>> And
>>>>
>>> it's openeing has been delayed by cold and snow at the chosen site...
>>
>> Another anachronism, courtesy of your tax dollar.
>>
>> Glad we've got superfluous spending under control.
>
>
> Not only that but they cut the NASA budget to help fund it, and NASA is
> going to be part of it. There are no plans for new spacecraft.
>
> I guess we'll just hitch rides with the Russians...or the Chinese.
>
> This guy is making Carter look good...
>
>


From: Mike Hunter on 10 Feb 2010 11:36
It would be far better to not do it at all.

"ACAR" <dimndsonmywndshld(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bb8e9e82-bf81-4a52-b721-433466a879d3(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 9, 9:25 pm, Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B <Tru...(a)e86.GTS> wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:20:35 -0500, dr_jeff wrote:
>> >http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/business/energy-environment/09noaa....
>>
>> And it's openeing has been delayed by cold and snow at the chosen site...
>
> actually, as the article says, Congressional approval is required
> before the Agency is formed.
> at about 1/10 the size of the National Weather Service, you'd think it
> might be more efficient to make it an office within the NWS rather
> than another organization within NOAA.


From: dr_jeff on 10 Feb 2010 14:55
Mike Hunter wrote:
> Will it ever end with all of these environuts? Lord help us all!

Actually, we are using our God-given brains.

> "dr_jeff" <utz(a)msu.edu> wrote in message
> news:teOdnXUvsdFuiu_WnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/business/energy-environment/09noaa.html?ref=todayspaper
>
>
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: {BS} Bill Clinton was right!
Next: Toyota more than just a brand in KY