Toyota resale value
in [Toyota Camry]
|
Prev: Toyota Sales Up 9.8% in November; Lexus Leaps Forward 24%. - seems misleading
Next: The First Solar ‘Solar Impulse’ Now Flies
From: Mark on 5 Dec 2009 22:14 Saw in the paper today that a 2010 Toyota is tops in the expected resale value after 5 years. Toyotas on average are expected to retain 38.8% of their purchase price. GM only around 31% and Chrysler around 29%. None of the numbers are all that great - my $30,000 RAV4 will only be worth $11,600 in 5 years, but that is still $2,300 better than a $30,000 GM that would only be worth $9,300.
From: john on 6 Dec 2009 13:08 Great news! So who wants one? On Dec 5, 7:14 pm, "Mark" <m...(a)nospam.com> wrote: > Saw in the paper today that a 2010 Toyota is tops in the expected resale > value after 5 years. Toyotas on average are expected to retain 38.8% of > their purchase price. GM only around 31% and Chrysler around 29%. None of > the numbers are all that great - my $30,000 RAV4 will only be worth $11,600 > in 5 years, but that is still $2,300 better than a $30,000 GM that would > only be worth $9,300.
From: hls on 6 Dec 2009 17:43 "Mark" <mwl(a)nospam.com> wrote in message news:ekFSm.58942$de6.42250(a)newsfe21.iad... > Saw in the paper today that a 2010 Toyota is tops in the expected resale > value after 5 years. Toyotas on average are expected to retain 38.8% of > their purchase price. GM only around 31% and Chrysler around 29%. None of > the numbers are all that great - my $30,000 RAV4 will only be worth > $11,600 in 5 years, but that is still $2,300 better than a $30,000 GM that > would only be worth $9,300. > I think that Toyota has enjoyed very good price stability, especially in certain models, when compared with some other cars. Try to buy one from an individual or even a used car lot. They can be very proud of them.
From: FatterDumber& Happier Moe on 9 Dec 2009 07:09 Mark wrote: > Saw in the paper today that a 2010 Toyota is tops in the expected resale > value after 5 years. Toyotas on average are expected to retain 38.8% of > their purchase price. GM only around 31% and Chrysler around 29%. None > of the numbers are all that great - my $30,000 RAV4 will only be worth > $11,600 in 5 years, but that is still $2,300 better than a $30,000 GM > that would only be worth $9,300. > > You pay by the mile and the time on new vehicles. The costs per mile may vary but it will cost X amount of dollars to get down the road a mile. Initial cost, trade in or sale of the vehicle, taxes, insurance, fuel, repairs, maintenance it all adds up. Any idea of what the actual cost is to actually go a mile? On a decent used car or pickup for me, I come up with 1,000 bucks a year and 25 cents a mile, more or less......probably more.
From: hls on 17 Dec 2009 12:37
"FatterDumber& Happier Moe" <"WheresMyCheck"@UncleSamLoves.Mee> wrote in message news:4b1f9378$0$5356$bbae4d71(a)news.suddenlink.net... > Mark wrote: >> Saw in the paper today that a 2010 Toyota is tops in the expected resale >> value after 5 years. Toyotas on average are expected to retain 38.8% of >> their purchase price. GM only around 31% and Chrysler around 29%. None >> of the numbers are all that great - my $30,000 RAV4 will only be worth >> $11,600 in 5 years, but that is still $2,300 better than a $30,000 GM >> that would only be worth $9,300. >> >> > > You pay by the mile and the time on new vehicles. The costs per mile may > vary but it will cost X amount of dollars to get down the road a mile. > Initial cost, trade in or sale of the vehicle, taxes, insurance, fuel, > repairs, maintenance it all adds up. > Any idea of what the actual cost is to actually go a mile? > On a decent used car or pickup for me, I come up with 1,000 bucks a year > and 25 cents a mile, more or less......probably more. It isnt linear. Driving that new car off the lot puts a lump in your linear simulation. Some cars depreciate more quickly than others. Ever buy a Fiat? |