From: dh on
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2(a)> wrote in message
> Depends on how many trucks the dealership sells in a week. If they sell
> 100 a week they need around a 1000 on hand . If they sell only 10, 80
> will do. A sixty day supply on the ground is ideal, except at intro in
> the fall through balance out in the spring, then a ninety day supply is
> better. Don't for get Ford sells F150s at a rate around six times that of
> the Tundra and Ford has around twice as many dealerships
> mike

You suggested, recently, that I talk to your accountant. I suggest you pay
him a visit yourself. Somebody's paying interest on those big Detroit
inventories. Sixty days' is more than enough and Detroit would love to have
their stock moving as fast as the Prius, the Camry or the Rav to keep their
interest expense low.

> "Jeff" <news(a)> wrote in message
> news:7oJGh.582$3i.42(a)trnddc01...
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2(a)> wrote in message
>> news:efqdnTwdnoQVxnbYnZ2dnUVZ_hmtnZ2d(a)
>>> Can't prove it by me, my local Chevy dealer has two dozen Toyotas of all
>>> types on his lot. Do a search and I believe you will find the 2006
>>> Tundra holds the record for on unsold vehicles LOL
>>> mike
>> From these reports, you can see that Toyota is selling its new truck
>> pretty fast. It has about 4 or 5 weeks supply. That compares to about 15
>> weeks supply for Fords.
>> The big 3 now have the most unsold inventory as well as the how long the
>> supply will last, i.e., how many days it will take to sell the same
>> number of vehicles as they have in inventory.
>> Jeff

Posted via a free Usenet account from

From: Wickeddoll´┐Ż on

"Ray O" ...
> "Ed White" ...
>> On Mar 5, 2:17 pm, "Jeff" <wrote:
>>> Don't forget that Toyota designed the hybrid components in the Escape
>>> (they
>>> are similar to the ones in the Prius). They get some of hte props, too.
>> Most of "Toyota's" hybrid technology was aquired by buying Aisin-
>> Warner. It is interesting, if you go to the Aisin-Warner's web site,
>> they freeely admit to selling hybrid components to Ford. They never
>> mention that they also sell them to Toyota. Toyota seems to enjoy
>> projecting the image that they developed the technology internally
>> instead of buying up the company that actually developed the
>> technology.
>> Ed
> The Toyota's ownership in Aisin goes back way before they even came to the
> U.S. From my "insiders" experience, I'd say that Toyota developed the
> technology and had Aisin produce it, which is how Toyota usually works.
> --
> Ray O

I'm wondering why CE White posts as two different aliases.


From: larry moe 'n curly on

Ed White wrote:

> Most of "Toyota's" hybrid technology was aquired by buying Aisin-
> Warner.

Transmissions, brakes, drivetrain components, furniture, and

From: C. E. White on

"Wickeddoll´┐Ż" <wickeddoll1958diespammersdie(a)> wrote in
message news:eshsg9.4hc.1(a)

> I'm wondering why CE White posts as two different aliases.

Because I post from two or three different computers. Some have a
newsreader installed, some do not. For ones with newsreaders, I am
cewhite. When I post from Google, I am Ed White. There is no
subterfuge involved, just different computers.


From: C. E. White on

"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly(a)> wrote in message

> Transmissions, brakes, drivetrain components, furniture, and
> mattresses:

Aisin is large conglomerate. The hybrid technology came out of the
part of the company that was originally Aisin-Warner. This was a joint
venture between Aisin-Seiki and Borg-Warner many years ago (late 60s,
early 70s). Eventually this became the primary supplier of automatic
transmissions to Toyota. At some point Borg-Warner was kicked out.
Toyota has some ownership interest in what is now called Aisin AW Co.,
Ltd.. With Japanese companies it is almost impossible to figure out
who owns what. Still Toyota never mentions that they buy their
automatics from Aisin. I suppose since they own part of the company,
they don't have to mention that. Aisin also sells automatic
transmissions to Ford (6 speed for the Fusion for one) and GM.