From: Ralph Mowery on

"Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in message
news:hdqtm1$epq$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> Oops, my bad. When I responded to Ralph Mowery's post that mentioned a
> MAF sensor, I assumed the car had one without thinking about the model
> year.
>
> To Ralph, Toyota referred to the potentiometer type sensor on that vintage
> Camry as an "air flow meter." Air flow meters were pretty reliable so I
> could see why it was low on the list of suspects but they are easy to
> check with a meter.
> --
>
> Ray O
> (correct punctuation to reply)
>

It was a 1991 Camry 4 cylinder. I may have said MAF. It could have been
anything that had to do with the air flow. It was over 5 years ago and all
I remember about it was it was high up on the list of things to replace for
the problems I though the car was having. That was from a web site like
Autozone. I took it to a dealer because the sensor was around $ 500 to $
600.

As I mentioned I later found the dealership was not too well thought of for
repair work. Looks like if it was simple to check , the mechanic should
have done that in the nearly 3 weeks he was looking at it. Also he should
have done some other things you mentioned, but must not have done those
either. I think he was just a parts changer and did not do any real tests.




From: Ray O on

"Ralph Mowery" <rmowery28146(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:htadnfGtOfORYZzWnZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d(a)earthlink.com...
>
> "Ray O" <rokigawa(a)NOSPAMtristarassociates.com> wrote in message
> news:hdqtm1$epq$2(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> Oops, my bad. When I responded to Ralph Mowery's post that mentioned a
>> MAF sensor, I assumed the car had one without thinking about the model
>> year.
>>
>> To Ralph, Toyota referred to the potentiometer type sensor on that
>> vintage Camry as an "air flow meter." Air flow meters were pretty
>> reliable so I could see why it was low on the list of suspects but they
>> are easy to check with a meter.
>> --
>>
>> Ray O
>> (correct punctuation to reply)
>>
>
> It was a 1991 Camry 4 cylinder. I may have said MAF. It could have been
> anything that had to do with the air flow. It was over 5 years ago and
> all I remember about it was it was high up on the list of things to
> replace for the problems I though the car was having. That was from a web
> site like Autozone. I took it to a dealer because the sensor was around $
> 500 to $ 600.
>
> As I mentioned I later found the dealership was not too well thought of
> for repair work. Looks like if it was simple to check , the mechanic
> should have done that in the nearly 3 weeks he was looking at it. Also he
> should have done some other things you mentioned, but must not have done
> those either. I think he was just a parts changer and did not do any real
> tests.
>

It is possible to check the output signal of just about every sensor in a
car. and the proper, professional approach is to check the signal before
replacing a sensor.
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)