Prev: Hey, Dumb'Uns -- Still Have Faith In TOYOTA'S CREDIBILITY?
Next: Do you think the Christian BS really pacifies wild people?
From: Aratzio on 15 May 2010 23:48
On Sat, 15 May 2010 21:07:37 -0500, in the land of alt.aratzio,
"CharlesGrozny" <n5hsr(a)hotmail.com> got double secret probation for
writing:

>
>"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>news:vjGHn.10172$h57.6376(a)newsfe22.iad...
>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 16:05:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 16:29:31 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio, Hachiroku
>>> ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 15 May 2010 11:24:10 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>We'll see what happens after Obama's girl Elena gets on the Supreme
>>>>>>Court. You'll be OK because you praise idio...er, Democrats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> So, you are as pig ignorant as Grozny too. Not surprising. So, have you
>>>>> figured out the 14th amendment yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you always feel the need to protect poor Grozny? Kinda like the
>>>>> whole Rainman thing only Grozny is just an idiot no savant.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I guess you don't really know a lot about Kegan, do you? Not surprising.
>>>>Obama nominated her, so she's the girl for you!
>>>
>>> Well, I at least know her name is Kagan. I would have been happier with
>>> Diane Wood.
>>
>> Good for you.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Why don't you look up some of the things she's said over the last 20
>>>>years? You're the one crying about "rights" being taken away. This makes
>>>>AZ's law look like a TinkerToy by comparison.
>>>
>>> I'll note you, as usual, just cast unverifiable aspersions based upon
>>> whatever wingnut talking point you have been fed.
>>
>> In 1996 she wrote an article in the University of Chicago Law Review
>> entitled, �Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental
>> Motive in First Amendment Doctrine.� Kagan argued that government has
>> the right, even considering the First Amendment, to restrict free speech,
>> when the government believes the speech is "harmful", as long as the
>> restriction is done with good intentions
>>
>>
>>
>> This is not what the First Amendment was written for.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Doesn't bother you, because you say what the Libs want you to anyway,
>>>>therefore you're OK with it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I actually feel she is too conservative to replace John Paul Stevens.
>>
>> BWAHAHAHA! Why, because she opposes late-term abortions? About the only
>> thing she seems to be on the correct side of.
>>
>>>
>>> You really don't have much in the way of self-informed opinion, do you.
>>
>> Probably a bit more than you. You knew how to spell her name, anyway.
>> Beyond that, I guess you don't know a whole lot. After 9/11 she was
>> instrumental in getting Armed Forces recruiters off college campuses, but
>> that was overturned.
>>
>>
>
>And Mr. Araza$$hole seems to be on the WRONG side of every issue as is Ms
>Sotomeyor and Ms Kaganovich.
>
>He calls me afraid, and yet he's the sniveling coward from wank.wank.wank
>who apparently wants to be another Joey.
>
>Charles Grozny
>

Let me get this straight, someone that addresses you directly is a
"sniveling coward" and you, who can only hide behind the skirts of
others mewling like a spanked cur are the brave fighter for freedom of
speech.

Has anyone told him yet about his pig ignorance with regard to the
first amendment?

So, Chuck, if you are so brave, pick the subject you feel you are most
knowledgable and have a sufficient grasp of the facts and present your
side. I'll debate you, one-on-one. I'll ignore all of the peanut
gallery and focus ALL of my attention upon you and your arguments.
Just you, no one else. That shouldn't scare you any, right?

Now a brave and confident man like yourself should be able to come out
from inside those skirts and demonstrate he actually owns a set of
balls and would take me up on it.

I'll proffer the same to any of you cowards in alt.autos.toyota

So, what are the odds that they all keep hiding.

The clock ticks.

Hey, goat fucker, make sure they all see that and watch as they are
shown to be completely without any sort of honesty or integrity.

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Hey, Dumb'Uns -- Still Have Faith In TOYOTA'S CREDIBILITY?
Next: Do you think the Christian BS really pacifies wild people?