From: Jeff Strickland on

"a" <a(a)thisisnotmyrealemail.com> wrote in message
news:Z7ssm.44237$Db2.40699(a)edtnps83...
> Mike wrote:
>> I'm no Toyota fanatic but that story sounds fishy to me.
>>
>> I the first place what Toyota can reach 120 MPH, except while going down
>> a
>> mountain?
>>
>> In the second place EVERY vehicle has more brake HP than engine HP.
>
>
> I think you have an errant view on what brake horsepower is:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower#Brake_horsepower
>
> Plus, plenty of Toyotas have top speeds rated above 120MPh, but the Lexus
> ES quoted in the article can do north of 140MPh.
>
> a

I think you're right on both counts -- The Lexus can exceed 120mph, and
Brake Horsepower is not a reflection of the power of the braking system.

But, I think you miss the point, the brakes should be able to drag the car
down to a managable speed so that the target one selects to finally make it
stop is not so traumatic as drilling the car into a cliff, or off a cliff.
If the brakes can drag the car down to 30, say, and then the ignition is
cut, the resulting heavy pressure on the brake pedal will surely cause the
passengers to be launched through the windshield if they are not restrained
by seat belts. Certainly, the brakes will be vary hot, and might even
require major service at the end of the day, but I just do not understand
how a trained CHP Officer would have so much trouble with this car. Grandma
might not deal with the same issues very well, but for some reason I think
CHP officers are trained in high speed pursuit that ought to include high
speed stopping.

There are far too many fishy "facts" to this story.









From: ben91932 on
On Sep 17, 7:14 am, "Mike" <mikehu...(a)lycos.com> wrote:
> I'm no Toyota fanatic but that story sounds fishy to me.
>
> I the first place what Toyota can reach 120 MPH, except while going down a
> mountain?


He *was* going down a mountain. I live nearby and have driven that
grade many times.. even lost a master cylinder going down it several
years back... very scary...
It's a steep downhill coming off a long straight highway ending into
a 't' intersection, with a creek bed on the other side.
I have a Highlander with a similar engine (270ish HP v6) and have done
110 down that hill with throttle left over. The ES350 has a governed
top speed of 131mph.

> In the second place EVERY vehicle has more brake HP than engine HP.   If you
> doubt that floor the throttle on YOUR vehicle and apply the foot brake with
> you left foot and take note of what happens.   ;)

The car strains and slows a little until the brakes overheat and fade
away.
I still dont know why he didnt just slip it into nuetral and let the
engine scream...(or even if the car would let him..)
Very sad situation...

From: a on
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> "a" <a(a)thisisnotmyrealemail.com> wrote in message
> news:Z7ssm.44237$Db2.40699(a)edtnps83...
>> Mike wrote:
>>> I'm no Toyota fanatic but that story sounds fishy to me.
>>>
>>> I the first place what Toyota can reach 120 MPH, except while going down
>>> a
>>> mountain?
>>>
>>> In the second place EVERY vehicle has more brake HP than engine HP.
>>
>> I think you have an errant view on what brake horsepower is:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower#Brake_horsepower
>>
>> Plus, plenty of Toyotas have top speeds rated above 120MPh, but the Lexus
>> ES quoted in the article can do north of 140MPh.
>>
>> a
>
> I think you're right on both counts -- The Lexus can exceed 120mph, and
> Brake Horsepower is not a reflection of the power of the braking system.
>
> But, I think you miss the point, the brakes should be able to drag the car
> down to a managable speed so that the target one selects to finally make it
> stop is not so traumatic as drilling the car into a cliff, or off a cliff.
> If the brakes can drag the car down to 30, say, and then the ignition is
> cut, the resulting heavy pressure on the brake pedal will surely cause the
> passengers to be launched through the windshield if they are not restrained
> by seat belts. Certainly, the brakes will be vary hot, and might even
> require major service at the end of the day, but I just do not understand
> how a trained CHP Officer would have so much trouble with this car. Grandma
> might not deal with the same issues very well, but for some reason I think
> CHP officers are trained in high speed pursuit that ought to include high
> speed stopping.
>
> There are far too many fishy "facts" to this story.
>


I know, I just thought I'd point out the factual errors. I agree on the
fishy smell. Turn the ignition back to "Acc" or whatever it's called on
that car? Brake hard - pull up the emerg./parking brake?

a
From: a on
a wrote:
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>> "a" <a(a)thisisnotmyrealemail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Z7ssm.44237$Db2.40699(a)edtnps83...
>>> Mike wrote:
>>>> I'm no Toyota fanatic but that story sounds fishy to me.
>>>>
>>>> I the first place what Toyota can reach 120 MPH, except while going down
>>>> a
>>>> mountain?
>>>>
>>>> In the second place EVERY vehicle has more brake HP than engine HP.
>>> I think you have an errant view on what brake horsepower is:
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower#Brake_horsepower
>>>
>>> Plus, plenty of Toyotas have top speeds rated above 120MPh, but the Lexus
>>> ES quoted in the article can do north of 140MPh.
>>>
>>> a
>> I think you're right on both counts -- The Lexus can exceed 120mph, and
>> Brake Horsepower is not a reflection of the power of the braking system.
>>
>> But, I think you miss the point, the brakes should be able to drag the car
>> down to a managable speed so that the target one selects to finally make it
>> stop is not so traumatic as drilling the car into a cliff, or off a cliff.
>> If the brakes can drag the car down to 30, say, and then the ignition is
>> cut, the resulting heavy pressure on the brake pedal will surely cause the
>> passengers to be launched through the windshield if they are not restrained
>> by seat belts. Certainly, the brakes will be vary hot, and might even
>> require major service at the end of the day, but I just do not understand
>> how a trained CHP Officer would have so much trouble with this car. Grandma
>> might not deal with the same issues very well, but for some reason I think
>> CHP officers are trained in high speed pursuit that ought to include high
>> speed stopping.
>>
>> There are far too many fishy "facts" to this story.
>>
>
>
> I know, I just thought I'd point out the factual errors. I agree on the
> fishy smell. Turn the ignition back to "Acc" or whatever it's called on
> that car? Brake hard - pull up the emerg./parking brake?
>
> a

PS - Or as "ben91932" points out - just plonk it in neutral. Was the CHP
officer driving?
From: hls on

"a" <a(a)thisisnotmyrealemail.com> wrote in message
news:Z7ssm.44237$Db2.40699(a)edtnps83...
> Mike wrote:
>> I'm no Toyota fanatic but that story sounds fishy to me.
>>
>> I the first place what Toyota can reach 120 MPH, except while going down
>> a
>> mountain?
>>
>> In the second place EVERY vehicle has more brake HP than engine HP.

I dont know how fast our Avalon would go, but it has a good tranny and
268 horsepower to pull it. Speedometer indicates 160, but I have no idea
how fast you could really push it.