From: pandora on
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:35:52 -0400, ah wrote:

> On 6/13/2010 1:10 AM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:53:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:34:30 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
>>> writing:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:56:57 -0400, tak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>>>> news:_3RQn.769$hw5.300(a)newsfe04.iad...
>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They're the wrong facts, but I suppose you need anything to make
>>>>>> you feel justified.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> "Most of the arguments to which I am party fall somewhat short of
>>>>> being impressive, owing to the fact that neither I nor my opponent
>>>>> knows what we are talking about."
>>>>> Robert Benchley
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That just about fits quite well. However, I'm not giving dipshit the
>>>>satisfaction of an answer.
>>>
>>> Not that you are actually capable, beyond what you had already stated
>>> with regard to reduction of foreign troops, which was "dumb". Your
>>> idea of intelligent is to continue to subsidize the German, British &
>>> Japanese defense budgets with our tax money.
>>
>> Why not? We're subsidizing millions here that are totally worthless.
>> Why don't you pick a fight about the billions wasted on Welfare?
>
> OMG! People are starving in China! Earthquakes suck! Black people own
> machetes! LOL!
>
:-) As well (and I missed it the first time around), he's now
complaining about "billions wasted on Welfare" and not billions wasted on
welfare fraud. It would seem he doesn't want anyone to have any kind of
assistance.

From: Hachiroku ハチロク on
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:09:41 -0500, pandora wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:35:52 -0400, ah wrote:
>
>> On 6/13/2010 1:10 AM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:53:55 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:34:30 -0400, in the land of alt.aratzio,
>>>> Hachiroku ???? <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> got double secret probation for
>>>> writing:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:56:57 -0400, tak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno(a)e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:_3RQn.769$hw5.300(a)newsfe04.iad...
>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:08:24 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is so nice when the facts are ALWAYS on my side.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They're the wrong facts, but I suppose you need anything to make
>>>>>>> you feel justified.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Most of the arguments to which I am party fall somewhat short of
>>>>>> being impressive, owing to the fact that neither I nor my opponent
>>>>>> knows what we are talking about."
>>>>>> Robert Benchley
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>That just about fits quite well. However, I'm not giving dipshit the
>>>>>satisfaction of an answer.
>>>>
>>>> Not that you are actually capable, beyond what you had already stated
>>>> with regard to reduction of foreign troops, which was "dumb". Your
>>>> idea of intelligent is to continue to subsidize the German, British &
>>>> Japanese defense budgets with our tax money.
>>>
>>> Why not? We're subsidizing millions here that are totally worthless.
>>> Why don't you pick a fight about the billions wasted on Welfare?
>>
>> OMG! People are starving in China! Earthquakes suck! Black people own
>> machetes! LOL!
>>
> :-) As well (and I missed it the first time around), he's now
> complaining about "billions wasted on Welfare" and not billions wasted on
> welfare fraud. It would seem he doesn't want anyone to have any kind of
> assistance.


Why should we hand out "crazy checks" because a kid's got ADD?
Stupid, if you ask me.